Skip to main content

A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools (EKAW 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1937))

Abstract

The interchange of ontologies across the World Wide Web (WWW) and the cooperation among heterogeneous agents placed on it is the main reason for the development of a new set of ontology specification languages, based on new web standards such as XML or RDF. These languages (SHOE, XOL, RDF, OIL, etc) aim to represent the knowledge contained in an ontology in a simple and human-readable way, as well as allow for the interchange of ontologies across the web. In this paper, we establish a common framework to compare the expressiveness and reasoning capabilities of „traditional” ontology languages (Ontolingua, OKBC, OCML, FLogic, LOOM) and „web-based” ontology languages, and conclude with the results of applying this framework to the selected languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amann, B., Fundulaki, I. Integrating Ontologies and Thesauri to Build RDF Schemas. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg, C. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. W3C Recommendation. Feb1998. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.

  3. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification. W3C Proposed Recommendation. March, 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-schema.

  4. Chaudhri, V., Farquhar, A, Fikes, R., Karp, P., Rice, J. The Generic Frame Protocol 2.0. July, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duineveld, A., Studer, R., Weiden, M, Kenepa, B., Benjamis, R. WonderTools? A comparative study of ontological engineering tools. Proceedings of KAW99. Banff. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Rice, J. The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction. Proceedings of KAW96. Banff, Canada, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Genesereth, M., Fikes, R. Knowledge Interchange Format. Technical Report. Computer Science Department. Stanford University. Logic-92-1. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, R. A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition. #5: 199–220. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Harmelen, F., Fensel, D. Surveying notations for machine-processable semantics of Web sources. Proceedings of the IJCAI’99 Workshop on Ontologies & PSMs. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horrocks, I., Fensel, D., Harmelen, F., Decker, S., Erdmann, M, Klein, M. OIL in a Nutshell. Proceedings of the ECAI’00 Workshop on Application of Ontologies and PSMs. Berlin. Germany. August, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karp, R., Chaudhri, V., Thomere, J. XOL: An XML-Based Ontology Exchange Language. July, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kifer, M., Lausen, G., Wu, J. Logical Foundations of Object-Oriented and Frame-Based Languages. Journal of the ACM. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lassila, O., Swick, R. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. W3C Recommendation. January, 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-syntax.

  14. Lenat, D.B., Guha, R.V. Building Large Knowledge-based systems. Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesley. Reading. Massachusetts. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luke S., Heflin J. SHOE 1.01. Proposed Specification. SHOE Project. February, 2000. http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/spec1.01.htm

  16. MacGregor, R. Inside the LOOM clasifier. SIGART bulletin. #2(3):70–76. June, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Motta, E. Reusable Components for Knowledge Modelling. IOS Press. Amsterdam. 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A. Knowledge engineering and management. The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT press, Massachussets. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Studer, R., Benjamins, R., Fensel, D. Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. DKE 25(1–2).pp:161–197. 1998

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Using Protégé-2000 to Edit RDF. Technical Report. Knowledge Modelling Group. Stanford University. February, 2000. http://www.smi.Stanford.edu/projects/protege/protegerdf/protege-rdf.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A. (2000). A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools. EKAW 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1937. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41119-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39967-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics