Skip to main content

Mechanical Component Design for Multiple Ojectives Using Elitist Non-dominated Sorting GA

  • Conference paper
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI (PPSN 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1917))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we apply an elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm for solving mechanical component design problems with multiple objectives. Although there exists a number of classical techniques, evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have an edge over the classical methods in that they can find multiple Pareto-optimal solutions in one single simulation run. Recently, we proposed a much improved version of the originally proposed non-dominated sorting GA (we call NSGA-II) in that it is computationally faster, uses an elitist strategy, and it does not require fixing any niching parameter. In this paper, we use NSGA-II to handle constraints by using two implementations. On four mechanical component design problems borrowed from the literature, we show that the NSGA-II can find a much wider spread of solutions than classical methods and the NSGA. The results are encouraging and suggests immediate application of the proposed method to other more complex engineering design problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deb, K. (in press). An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K. and Goyal, M. (1998). A robust optimization procedure for mechanical component design based on genetic adaptive search. Transactions of the ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, 720(2), 162–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K. and Agrawal, R. B. (1995) Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9 115–148.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A. and Meyarivan, T (2000) A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Proceedings of the Sixth Parallel Problem Solving from Nature Conference. (Also Technical Report No. 200001. Kan-pur: Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kannan, B. K. and Kramer, S. N. (1995). An augmented Lagrange multiplier based method for mixed integer discrete continuous optimization and its applications to mechanical design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 116, 405–411.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knowles, J. and Corne, D. (1999) The Pareto archived evolution strategy: A new baseline algorithm for multiobjective optimisation. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway: New Jersey: IEEE Service Center, 98–105.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitra, K., Deb, K., and Gupta, S. K. (1998). Multiobjective dynamic optimization of an industrial Nylon 6 semibatch reactor using genetic algorithms. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 69(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Palli, N., Azram, S., McCluskey, P., and Sundararajan, R. (1999). An interactive multistage ε-inequality constraint method for multiple objectives decision making. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4). 678–686.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reklaitis, G. V., Ravindran, A. and Ragsdell, K. M. (1983). Engineering optimization methods and applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (1995) Multi-Objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms, Evolutionary Computation, 2(3):221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weile, D. S., Michielssen, E., and Goldberg, D. E. (1996). Genetic algorithm design of Pareto-optimal broad band microwave absorbers. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 38(4).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zitzler, E. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Methods and applications. Doctoral thesis ETH NO. 13398, Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deb, K., Pratap, A., Moitra, S. (2000). Mechanical Component Design for Multiple Ojectives Using Elitist Non-dominated Sorting GA. In: Schoenauer, M., et al. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI. PPSN 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1917. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_84

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_84

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41056-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45356-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics