Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2347))

Abstract

In previous work [10], we reported on an experiment performed in the context of SQL-Tutor, in which we analysed students’ self-assessment skills. This preliminary study revealed that more able students were better in assessing their knowledge. Here we report on a new study performed on the same system. This time, we analysed the effect of an open student model on students’ learning and self-assessment skills. Although we have not seen any significant difference in the post-test scores of the control and the experimental group, the less able students from the experimental group have scored significantly higher than the less able students from the control group. The more able students who had access to their models abandoned significantly less problems the control group. These are encouraging results for a very simple open model used in the study, and we believe that a more elaborate model would be more effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K. (2000) Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? Proc. ITS’2000, Springer-Verlag, pp. 292-303.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K., Cross, K. (1999) Tutoring Answer Explanation Fosters Learning with Understanding. In: Lajoie, S.P., Vivet, M. (eds): Proc. AIED’99, pp. 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P., Brown, A.L.: Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem-solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2) (1993) 221–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., Weber, G. (1996) ELM-ART: an Intelligent Tutoring System on World Wide Web. Proc. ITS’96, pp. 261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bull, S., Brna, P. (1997) What does Susan Know that Paul Doesn’t? (and vice versa): Contributing to each other’s student model. Proc. AIED 97, pp. 568–570.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reinmann, P., Glaser, R. (1989) Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conati, C., VanLehn, K.: Further Results from the Evaluation of an Intelligent Computer Tutor to Coach Self-Explanation. Proc. ITS’2000, Springer-Verlag, (2000) 304–313.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., Brna, P. (2001) Applying Interactive Open Learner Models to Learning Technical Terminology. Proc. UM 2001, Springer, pp. 148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kay, J. (1995) The UM toolkit for cooperative user modelling. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 149–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitrovic, A. Investigating students’ self-assessment skills. Proc. UM-2001, Sonthofen, July 2001, Springer-Verlag LNAI 2109, pp. 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S.: Evaluation of a Constraint-based Tutor for a Database Language. Int. J. on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(3-4), (1999) 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morales, R., Pain, H., Conlon, T. (2001) Effects of Inspecting Learner Models on Learners’ Abilities. Proc. AIED 2001, pp. 434–445.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ohlsson, S.: Constraint-based student modeling. In: Greer, J.E., McCalla, G (eds): Student modeling: the key to individualized knowledge-based instruction, (1994) 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paiva, A., Self, J. (1995) TAGUS-a user and learner modelling workbench. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swanson, H.L.: Influence of Metacognitive Knowledge and Aptitude on Problem Solving. J. Educational Psychology, 82 (1990) 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. White, B.Y., Shimoda, T. A, Frederiksen, J.R. (1999) Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development. Int. Journal on AI in Education, vol 10, 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zapata-Rivera, J.D., Greer, J.E. (2000) Inspecting and Visualizing Distributed Bayesian Student Models. Proc. ITS’2000, Springer, pp. 544–553.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mitrovic, A., Martin, B. (2002). Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning. In: De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds) Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. AH 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2347. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47952-X_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47952-X_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43737-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47952-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics