Skip to main content

Retrieving adaptable cases

The role of adaptation knowledge in case retrieval

  • Selected Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 837))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The retrieval of a suitable case is of crucial importance to the success of case-based reasoning. A good criterion for judging “case suitability” is how complex a case will be to adapt. However, it has proven difficult to directly calculate this measure of case “adaptability” without incurring the full cost of adaptation. This has led most researchers to exploit semantic similarity as a more tractable (albeit less accurate) answer to the question of case suitability.

This paper describes an approach to case retrieval that allows case adaptability to be accurately measured whilst overcoming the problems which, in the past, led to the adoption of semantic similarity based methods. We argue that our approach benefits from improved retrieval accuracy, flexibility, and greater overall problem solving efficacy. Our methods are implemented in Déjà Vu, a case-based reasoning system for software design, and we use examples from Déjà Vu to demonstrate our ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.J. Hammond: Case-Based Planning. Academic Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Smyth, and P. Cunningham: Déjà Vu: A Hierarchical Case-Based Reasoning System for Software Design. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Wiley (1992) 587–589

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.T. Keane: Analogical problem solving. Chichester: Ellis Horwood (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Gentner: Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7. (1983) 155–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Bareiss, J.A. King: Similarity Assessment in Case-based Reasoning. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. Morgan Kaufmann. (1989) 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Thagard, K.J. Holyoak, G. Nelson, D. Gochfeld: Analog Retrieval by Constraint Satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 46. (1990) 259–310

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Cain, M.J. Pazzani, G. Silverstein: Using Domain Knowledge to Influence Similarity Judgements. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. Morgan Kaufmann. (1991) 191–198

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Kolodner: Judging Which is the “Best” Case for a Case-Based Reasoner. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. Morgan Kaufmann. (1989) 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.K. Goel: Integration of Case-Based Reasoning and Model-Based Reasoning for Adaptive Design Problem Solving. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Birnbaum, G. Collins, M. Brand, M. Freed, B. Krulwich, L. Pryor: A Model-Based Approach to the Construction of Adaptive Case-Based Planning Systems. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. Morgan Kaufmann (1988) 191–198

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hendler, A. Tate, M. Drummond: AI Planning: Systems and Techniques. AI Magazine, 11. (1990) 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.P. Sycara, D. Navinchandra: Influences: A Thematic Abstraction for Creative Use of Multiple Cases. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop. Morgan Kaufmann (1991) 133–144

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stefan Wess Klaus-Dieter Althoff Michael M. Richter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smyth, B., Keane, M.T. (1994). Retrieving adaptable cases. In: Wess, S., Althoff, KD., Richter, M.M. (eds) Topics in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 837. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58330-0_88

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58330-0_88

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58330-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48655-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics