Skip to main content

On the sparse set conjecture for sets with low density

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 95 (STACS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 900))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the sparse set conjecture for sets with low density. The sparse set conjecture states that P=NP if and only if there exists a sparse Turing hard set for NP. In this paper we study a weaker variant of the conjecture. We are interested in the consequences of NP having Turing hard sets of density f(n), for (unbounded) functions f(n), that are sub-polynomial, for example log(n). We establish a connection between Turing hard sets for NP with density f(n) and bounded nondeterminism: We prove that if NP has a Turing hard set of density f(n), then satisfiability is computable in polynomial time with O(log(n)*f(n c)) many nondeterministic bits for some constant c. As a consequence of the proof technique we obtain absolute results about the density of Turing hard sets for EXP. We show that no Turing hard set for EXP can have sub-polynomial density. On the other hand we show that these results are optimal w.r.t. relativizing computations. For unbounded functions f(n), there exists an oracle relative to which NP has a f(n) dense Turing hard tally set but still P≠NP.

Part of this research was done while visiting the Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya in Barcelona. Partially suported by the Dutch foundation for scientific research (NWO) through NFI Project ALADDIN, under contract number NF 62-376 and a TALENT stipend.

Part of this research was done while visiting the Univ. Politècnica de Catalunya in Barcelona.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Arvind, Y. Han, L. Hemachandra, J. Koebler, A. Lozano, M. Mundhenk, M. Ogiwara, U. Schöning, R. Silvestri, and T. Thierauf. Reductions to sets of low information content. In K. Ambos-Spies, S. Homer, and U. Schöning, editors, Complexity Theory, pages 1–46. Cambridge University Press, December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Beigel, M. Bellare, J. Feigenbaum, and S. Goldwasser. Languages that are easier to verify than their proofs. In Proc. 32nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 19–28, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Borodin and A. Deniers. Some comments on functional self-reducibility and the NP hierarchy. Technical Report TR76-284, Cornell University, Department of Computer Science, Upson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Balcázar, J. Díaz, and J. Gabarró. Structural Complexity I. Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Berman and H. Hartmanis. On isomorphisms and density of NP and other complete sets. SIAM J. Comput., 6:305–322, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Buhrman and S. Homer. Superpolynomial circuits, almost sparse oracles and the exponential hierarchy. In R. Shyamasundar, editor, Proc. 12th Conference on the Foundations of Software Technology & Theoretical Computerscience, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 116–127. Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.L. Balcázar, M. Hermo, and E. Mayordomo. Characterizations of logarithmic advice complexity classes. In Algorithms, Software, Architecture: Information Procesing 92, volume 1, pages 315–321. Elsevier, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Díaz and J. Torán. Classes of bounded nondeterminism. Math. Systems Theory, 23:21–32, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Homer and L. Longpré. On reductions of NP sets to sparse sets. J. Computer and System Sciences, 48:324–336, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Hemaspaandra, M. Ogiwara, and S. Toda. Space-efficient recognition of sparse self-reducible languages. Computational Complexity. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Kannan. Circuit-size lower bounds and non-reducibility to sparse sets. Information and Control, 55(1–3):40–56, October/November/December 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Kintala and P. Fisher. Refining nondeterminism in relativized polynomial-time bounded computations. SIAM J. Comput., 9(1):46–53, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Karp and R. Lipton. Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes. In Proc. 12th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 302–309, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Ko. On helping by robust oracle machines that take advice. Theoretical Computer Science, 52:15–36, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A.V. Naik, M. Ogiwara, and A.L. Selman. P-selective sets, and reducing search to decision vs. self-reducibility. In Proc. Structure in Complexity Theory 8th annual conference, pages 52–64, San Diego, California, 1993. IEEE computer society press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Ogiwara and A. Lozano. On one query self-reducible sets. In Proc. Structure in Complexity Theory 6th annual conference, pages 139–151, Chicago, Ill., 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Ogiwara and O. Watanabe. On polynomial time bounded truth-table reducibility of NP sets to sparse sets. SIAM J. Comput., 20:471–483, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Pippenger. On simultaneous resource bounds. In Proc. 20th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 307–311, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.B. Wilson. Relativized circuit complexity. J. Comput. System Sci., 31:169–181, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ernst W. Mayr Claude Puech

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buhrman, H., Hermo, M. (1995). On the sparse set conjecture for sets with low density. In: Mayr, E.W., Puech, C. (eds) STACS 95. STACS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 900. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59042-0_109

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59042-0_109

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59042-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49175-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics