Skip to main content

Socio-Economics and Water Management: Revisiting the Contribution of Economics in the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Greece

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rivers of Greece

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 59))

Abstract

This chapter sets out the socio-economic principles that should govern water resources management for the achievement of a sustainable allocation of the resource over time and across space, in accordance with the EU Water Framework Directive. The resulting allocation should be economically efficient, socially equitable and acceptable and environmentally sustainable. The main background concept guiding the identification of such an allocation is the ‘total economic value (TEV)’ of water resources. This concept derives from the ecosystem goods and services that water resources provide the economy and society. In this chapter we present the state of the art with regard to estimating the TEV of water resources and explain how these estimations can facilitate the design and implementation of different European policies in relation to mitigation of different forms of water stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Waternote 9 can be accessed here (last accessed 12/02/2015): http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/participation/pdf/waternotes/water_note9_other_water_legislation.pdf.

  2. 2.

    Please see also National Research Council [5] book on groundwater valuation (Table 1.3, p. 20) for a taxonomy of groundwater values in particular. For example, according to this taxonomy, groundwater use values are divided into extractive (municipal, industrial and agricultural) values and in situ (ecological, buffer, subsidence avoidance, recreational and seawater intrusion values) use values.

  3. 3.

    Work Package 6 ‘Application of valuation techniques to assess the benefits of groundwater quantity-quality improvements’ of the Genesis Project (Groundwater and Dependent Ecosystems: New Scientific and Technological Basis for Assessing Climate Change and Land-use Impacts on Groundwater). Genesis Project is available at: www.thegenesisproject.eu.

  4. 4.

    Apart from nonmarket valuation techniques and hydrological models, linear programming and various other econometric modelling approaches can be used for estimating the economic value of water. For example, programming models can be used for estimating the water quantity which maximises farmers’ private profits through computer simulations (in cases where there is no data on a wide range of prices). These techniques are, nevertheless, beyond the scope of this review chapter.

  5. 5.

    Management Plans (in Greek) are available at http://wfd.ypeka.gr (last accessed 12/02/2015).

  6. 6.

    The International Centre for Research on the Environment and the Economy (ICRE8) is the outcome of the evolution of the Research Team on Socio-Economic and Environmental Sustainability (ReSEES). More details about the team’s research can be found at: http://www.icre8.eu/.

Abbreviations

CBA:

Cost-benefit analysis

CEM:

Choice experiment method

CV:

Contingent valuation

RBD:

River basin district

TEV:

Total economic value

WFD:

Water framework directive

WTP:

Willingness to pay

References

  1. Commission of European Communities (CEC) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060&from=EN. Accessed 12 Feb 2015

  2. Koundouri P, Scarpa R, Stithou M (2014) A choice experiment for the estimation of the economic value of the river ecosystem: Management policies for sustaining NATURA (2000) species and the coastal environment. In: Koundouri P, Papandreou N (eds) Water resources management sustaining socio-economic welfare: the implementation of the European water framework directive in Asopos river basin in Greece. Global Issues in Water Policy. Springer, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-New York-London

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Communities (2003) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document No. 1, economics and the environment – the implementation challenge of the Water Framework Directive. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. http://www.enorasis.eu/uploads/files/Water%20Governance/9.Guidancedoc01_Economics_WATECO_WG2-6.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2015

  4. Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Sci Total Environ 365:105–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Committee on Valuing Ground Water, National Research Council (1997) Valuing ground water: economic concepts and approaches. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mahan B, Polasky S, Adams R (2000) Valuing urban wetlands: A property price approach. Land Econ 76:100–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Torell A, Libbin J, Miller M (1990) The market value of water in the Ogallala aquifer. Land Econ 66:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  8. King D, Sinden A (1988) Influence of soil conservation on farm land values. Land Econ 64(3):242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowker JM, English D, Donovan J (1996) Toward a value for guided rafting on southern rivers. J Agric Appl Econ 28:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson M, Carpenter S (1999) Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecol Appl 9:772–783

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2007) An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. DEFRA, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/221092/pb12852-eco-valuing.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2015

  12. Mitchell R, Carson R (1988) Evaluating the validity of contingent valuation studies. In: Peterson G, Driver B, Gregory R (eds) Amenity resource valuation: Integrating economics with other disciplines. Venture Publishing Inc, State College

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pate J, Loomis J (1997) The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecol Econ 20:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hite D, Hudson D, Intarapapong W (2002) Willingness to pay for water quality improvements: the case of precision application technology. J Agric Resour Econ 27(2):433–449

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lancaster K (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 84:132–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Willis K, Mcmahon P, Garrod G, Powe N (2002) Water companies’ services performance and environmental trade-offs. J Environ Plann 45(3):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER) (1997) Valuing ground water: Economic concepts and approaches. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309056403&page=75. Accessed 12 Feb 2015

  18. Koundouri P, Papandreou N, Remoundou K, Kountouris Y (2014) A bird’s eye view of the Greek Water Situation: The potential for the implementation of the EU WFD. In: Koundouri P, Papandreou N (eds) Water resources management sustaining socio-economic welfare: the implementation of the European water framework directive in Asopos river basin in Greece, Global Issues in Water Policy. Springer, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-New York-London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy J, Stevens T (2004) Contingent valuation, hypothetical bias, and experimental economics. Agric Resour Econ Rev 33(2):182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alfnes F, Rickertsen K (2011) Non-market valuation: experimental methods. In: Lusk JL, Roosen J, Shogren JF (eds) The Oxford handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy. Oxford University Press Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16(1):8–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harou J, Pulido-Velasquez M, Rosenberg D, Medellín -Azuara, J, Lund, R, Howitt R (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375(3–4):627–643

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brouwer R, Hofkes M (2008) Integrated hydro-economic modelling: approaches, key issues and future research directions. Ecol Econ 66:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koundouri P, Remoundou K, Kountouris Y (2010) A Note on the Implementation of the Economics of the EU Water Framework Directive under Data Limitations: a rapid appraisal approach. Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business, Working Paper 1008. http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/wpa_paper_list.php

  25. Genius M, Koundouri P, Nauges C, Tsouvelekas V (2013) Information transmission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion: social learning, extension services and spatial effects. Am J Agric Econ 96(1):328–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koundouri P, Papandreou NA (eds) (2014) Water resources management sustaining socio-economic welfare the implementation of the European water framework directive in Asopos River Basin in Greece. Global issues in water policy series, vol 7. ISBN:978-94-007-7635-7 (Print) 978-94-007-7636-4 (Online)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Drichoutis A, Koundouri P, Remoundou K (2014) A laboratory experiment for the estimation of health risks: policy recommendations. In: Koundouri P, Papandreou N (eds) Water resources management sustaining socio-economic welfare: the implementation of the European water framework directive in Asopos river basin in Greece, Global Issues in Water Policy. Springer, Dordrecht-Heidelberg-New York-London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tentes G, Damigos D (2012) The lost value of groundwater: the case of Asopos River Basin in Central Greece. Water Resour Manag 26(1):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tentes G, Tsiotsia A., Damigos, D (2013) Environmental cost of groundwater pollution: a choice experiment in Asopos River basin. In: Proceedings of the 1st EWaS-MED international conference “improving efficiency of water systems in a changing natural and financial environment”, 11–13 April. Thessaloniki, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  30. Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecol Econ 60:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phoebe Koundouri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koundouri, P., Reppas, D., Skianis, V. (2015). Socio-Economics and Water Management: Revisiting the Contribution of Economics in the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Greece. In: Skoulikidis, N., Dimitriou, E., Karaouzas, I. (eds) The Rivers of Greece. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2015_427

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics