Skip to main content
  • 246 Accesses

Abstract

The only thing that is permanent is change. the hidden paradox in the relationship between permanence and change is that “all change implies that something is preserved”, and that “in all permanence there is some degree of change” (Jones 1991: 235). Within landscape research, this paradox has in multiple ways been structuring how we have come to understand and interpret both the material and symbolic aspects of landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antrop, M. (2004). Why Landscapes of the Past are Important for the Future. Landscape and Urban Planning, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. & Duncan, J. (Eds.) (1992). Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. & Ley, D. (1993). Introduction. Representing the Place of Culture. In J. Duncan & D. Ley (Eds.), Place/Culture/Representation (pp. 1–21). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove D. (2003). Landscape: Ecology and Semiosis. In H. Palang & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes (pp. 15–21). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, R. & Peterson, A. (2003). Authenticity in Landscape Conservation and Management — the Importance of the Local Context. In H. Palang & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes (pp. 319–357). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1991). the Elusive Reality of Landscape. Concepts and Approaches in Landscape Research. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 45, 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang, H. & Fry, G. (Eds.) (2003). Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A. (2004). Has the Generalization Regarding Conservation of Trees and Shrubs in Swedish Agricultural Landscapes Gone too Far? Landscape and Urban Planning, in press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M., Setten, G. (2004). The Permanence of Persistence and Change. In: Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M., Setten, G. (eds) European Rural Landscapes: Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48512-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48512-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6585-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48512-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics