Abstract
Disaster recovery represents the least understood aspect of emergency management, from the standpoint of both the research community and practitioners (Berke, Kartez, & Wenger, 1993; Rubin, 1991). When compared to the other widely recognized phases of emergency management, that is, preparedness, response, and mitigation, scholars have yet to address fundamental questions, while practitioners have failed to establish an integrated policy framework or utilize readily available tools to improve disaster recovery outcomes (Berke et al., 1993; May and Williams, 1986; Mileti, 1999). Since the 1990s the concept of sustainability has been adopted by hazards researchers and applied to mitigation (Berke, 1995a; Burby, 1998; Godschalk, et. al., 1999; Mileti, 1999), recovery (Becker, 1994a; Berke, Kartez, & Wenger, 1993; Eadie et al., 2001; Oliver-Smith, 1990; Smith, 2004; United States Department of Energy, 1998), and to a lesser extent preparedness and response (Tierney, Lindell, & Perry, 2001). While recognized as a meaningful paradigm among scholars and a limited number of practitioners, achieving sustainable recovery following disasters is not a widespread phenomenon in the United States, owing in large part to the current recovery model in practice today. It is therefore the intent of this chapter to describe an improved policy implementation framework focused on achieving sustainable recovery. Emphasis is placed on the analysis of the United States model of recovery and the development of specific recommendations to improve the process. Key issues and research questions are identified in order to advance this agenda, including the need to develop a theory of recovery that emphasizes specific factors that facilitate or hinder this approach. Next, a review of the literature highlights the fact that while past research has addressed several recognized dimensions of sustainable recovery, the research has not been linked to a unifying theory that helps to clarify our understanding of how sustainable recovery can be achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beatley, T. (1998). The vision of sustainable communities. In R. Burby (Ed.), Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land use planning for sustainable communities (pp. 233–262). Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Gori, P.L. (1991). Communication between scientists and practice: The important link in knowledge utilization. Earthquake Spectra, 7(1), 89–95.
Cutter, S. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529–539.
Olshansky, R.B., & Kartez, J.D. (1998). Managing land use to build resilience. In R. Burby (Ed.), Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities (pp. 167–201). Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Comerio, M.C. (1998). Disaster hits home: New policy for urban housing recovery. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.
Berke, P. R. (1995a). Natural hazard reduction and sustainable development: A global assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 9(4), 370–382.
Friedman, J. (1981). Retracking America.. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
Bolin, R.C., & Bolton, P. (1986). Race, religion and ethnicity in disaster recovery. Monograph No. 42. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
Bolin, R.C., & Bolton, P. (1983). Recovery in Nicaragua and the USA. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1(1), 125–152.
Kates, R., & Pijawka, D. (1977). From rubble to monument: The pace of reconstruction. In J.E. Haas, E. Kates, & M. Bowden (Eds.), Reconstruction following disaster (pp. 1–23). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sullivan, M. (2003). Integrated recovery management: A new way of looking at a delicate process. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 18(2), 4–27.
Platt, R.H. (1998). Planning & land use adjustments in historical perspective. In R. Burby (Ed.), Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities (pp. 29–56). Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
White, G.F., & Haas, J. (1975). Assessment of research on natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawaing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Beatley, T. (1995). Promoting sustainable land use: Mitigating natural hazards through land use planning. Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center Publication No. 133A (6 pp.). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, College of Architecture.
Chang, S.E., & Miles, S. B. (2004). The dynamics of recovery: A framework. In Y. Okuyama & S. E. Chang (Eds.), Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters (pp. 181–204). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
May, P.J. (1985). Recovering from catastrophes: Federal disaster relief policy and politics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Clarke, L.B. (1999). Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pilkey, O.H., & Dixon, K.L. (1996). The corps and the shore. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Burby, R.J., & French, Steven. (1981). Gaping with floods: The land use management paradox. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47, 289–300.
Platt, R.H. (1999). Disasters and democracy: The politics of extreme natural events. Washington, DC: Island Press.
May, P.J., & Williams, W. (1986). Disaster policy implementation: Managing programs under shared governance. New York and London: Plenum Press.
Burby, R.J. (2005). Have state comprehensive planning mandates insured losses from natural disasters? Natural Hazards Review, 6(2), 67–81.
Jones, B.D. (1994). Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice, and public policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Davis, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. New York: Routledge.
Francaviglia, R.V. (1978). Xenia rebuilds: Effects of predisaster conditioning on post-disaster redevelopment. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 44(1), 13–24.
Cutter, S., Hodgson, M., & Dow, K. (2001). Subsidized inequities: The spatial patterning of environmental risks and federally assisted housing. Urban Geography, 22(1), 29–53.
Thieler, E., & Bush, D. (1991). Hurricanes Gilbert and Hugo send powerful messages forcoastal development. Journal of Geological Education, 39, 291–299.
Lindblom, C.E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Friesema, H.P., Caporaso J., Goldstein G., Lineberry, R., & McCleary, R. (1979). Aftermath: Communities after natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Wilson, R. (1991). Rebuilding after the Loma Prieta Earthquake in Santa Cruz. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
Mader, G.G., Spangle, W.E. , & Blair, M.L. (1980). Land use planning after earthquakes. Portola Valley, CA: William Spangle and Associates, Inc.
Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), 5–34.
Burby, R., Beatley, T., Berke, P.R., Deyle, R.E., French, S.P., Godschalk, D.R., et al. (1999). Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 247–258.
Stoker, R.P. (1991). Reluctant partners: Implementing federal policy. Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.
Fothergill, A. (2000). Knowledge transfer between researchers and practitioners. Natural Hazards Review, 1(2), 91–98.
Berke, P., Kartez, J., & Wenger, D. (1993). Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation, and equity. Disasters, 17, 93–109.
Forester, J. (1987). Planning in the face of conflict. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(3), 303–314.
Jones, N., Noji, E., Smith, G., & Wagner, R. (1993). Casualty in earthquakes. In K. Tierney & J. Nigg (Eds.), Socioeconomic Impacts. 1993 National Earthquake Conference (pp. 19–68). Memphis: Central United States Earthquake Consortium.
Aguirre, B.E. (2002). Can sustainable development sustain us? International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 20(2), 111–125.
Drabek, T.E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Haas, J.E., Kates, R., & Bowden, M. (1977). Reconstruction following disaster. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Logan, J. & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
May, P.J. (1994). Analyzing mandate design: State mandates governing hazard prone areas. The Journal of Federalism, 24, 1–16.
Deyle, R.E., & Smith, R.A. (1996). State planning mandates: State implementation and local government response. Tallahassee, FL: The Florida Planning Laboratory, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Florida State University.
Eadie, C., Emmer, R.E., Esnard, A.M., Michaels, S., Monday, J., Philipsborn, C., et al. (2001). Holistic disaster recovery: Ideas for building local sustainability after a natural disaster. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado.
Rubin, C.B. (1991). Recovery from disaster. In T. E. Drabek & G. J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local governments (pp. 224–259). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
Bolin, R.C., & Stanford, L. (1998b). The Northridge earthquake: Vulnerability and disaster. London: Routledge.
Bolin, R.C. (1985). Disasters and long-term recovery policy: A focus on housing and families. Policy Studies Review, 4(4), 704–715.
Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
Yin, R., & Moore, G.B. (1985). Utilization of research: Lessons from the natural hazards field. Washington, DC: Cosmos Corporation.
Harrel-Bond, E. (1986). Imposing aid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bolin, R.C., & Stanford, L. (1999). Constructing vulnerability in the first world: The Northridge earthquake in Southern California, 1994. In A. Oliver-Smith, & S. Hoffman (Eds.), The angry earth: Disasters in anthropological perspective (pp. 89–112). New York: Routledge.
Godschalk, D., Beately T., Berke, P., Brower, D., Kaiser, E., Bohl, C.C., et al. (1999). Natural hazard mitigation: Recasting disaster policy and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Birkland, T.A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Berke, P.R., Beatley, T., & Wilhite, S. (1989). Influences on local adoption of planning measures for earthquake hazard mitigation. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 7, 33–56.
May, P.J., & Deyle, R.E. (1998). Governing land use in hazardous areas with a patchwork system. In R. Burby (Ed.), Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Geipel, R. (1982). Disaster and reconstruction. The Fruili (Italy) earthquake of 1976. London: Allen & Unwin.
Shaw, R., Gupta, M., & Sarma, A. (2003). Community recovery and its sustainability: Lessons from the Gujarat Earthquake of India. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 18(2), 28–34.
Berke, P.R., & Beatley, T. (1997). After the hurricane: Linking recovery to sustainable development in the Caribbean. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Geis, D.E. (2000). By design: The disaster resilient and quality of life community. Natural Hazards Review, 1(3), 151–160.
Oliver-Smith, A. (1990). Post-disaster housing reconstruction and social inequality: A challenge to policy and practice. Disasters, 14, 7–19.
Rees, W.E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130.
Olson, R.S., & Olson, R.A. (1993). The rubble’s standing up in Oroville, California: The politics of building safety. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11(2), 163–188.
Cochrane, H.C. (1991). Hazards research is not affecting practice. Natural Hazards Observer, 15(6), 1–2.
Uphoff, N. (1986). Local institutional development: An analytical sourcebook with cases. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian.
Wright, J.D., & Rossi, P.H. (Eds.). (1981). Social science and natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
Burby, R., & Dalton, L. (1994). Plans can matter: The role of land use and state planning mandates on limiting development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 229–238.
Godschalk, D.R. (1992). Negotiating intergovernmental development policy conflicts: Practice-based guidelines. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2), 368–378.
Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Community innovation in hazardous materials management: Profess in implementing SARA Title III in the United States. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 88, 169–194.
Simon, H.A. (1977). Models of discovery. Boston: D. Reidel.
Olson, R.S., Olson, R.A., & Gawronski, V.T. (1999). Some buildings just can’t dance: Politics, life safety, and disaster. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
Becker, W.S., & Stauffer, R. (1994). Rebuilding the future: A guide to sustainable redevelopment for disaster-affected communities (25 pp.). Golden, CO: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Center of Excellence for Sustainable Development.
Rubin, C., Saperstein M., & Barbee, D. (1985). Community recovery from a major natural disaster. Monograph No. 41 (295 pp.). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science.
Chong, D. (1991). Collective action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Waugh, W.L., Jr., & Sylves, R.T. (1996). The intergovernmental relations of emergency management. In R.T. Sylves & W.L. Waugh, Jr. (Eds.), Disaster management in the U.S. and Canada (2nd ed., pp. 46–68). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Peacock, W.G., Morrow, B.H., & Gladwin, H. (Eds.). (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disaster. London: Routledge.
Kunreuther, H. (1973). Recovery from natural disasters: Insurance or federal Aid? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy.
Barton, A.H. (1969). Communities in disasters: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Rubin, C.B. (1985). The community recovery process in the United States after a major natural disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 3(2), 9–28.
Godschalk, D.R., Brower, D., & Beatley, T. (1989). Catastrophic coastal storms: Hazard mitigation and development management. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Skinner, N., & Becker, B. (1995). Pattonsburg, Missouri: On higher ground. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Sustainable Development.
Barry, J.M. (1997). Rising tide: The great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Burby, R.J. (Ed). (1998). Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for substainable. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Berke, P.R., & Beatley, T. (1992). Planing for earthquakes: Risk, politics and policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Olson, R.S. (2000). Toward a politics of disaster: Losses, values, agendas, and blame. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18(2), 265–287.
Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (1992). Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Wright, J.D., Rossi, P.H., Wright, S.R., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1979). After the clean-up: Long-range effects of natural disasters. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Quarantelli, E.L. (1989c). Human behavior in the Mexico City earthquake: Some implications from basic themes in survey findings. Preliminary Paper No. 37. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, G.P., Wenger, D. (2007). Sustainable Disaster Recovery: Operationalizing An Existing Agenda. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-73952-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-32353-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)