Skip to main content

Quality of Life of Older Homecare Clients

  • Chapter
Care-Related Quality of Life in Old Age

The objective of enabling older people to live in their own homes as long as possible is a widely accepted guiding principle of old age policies in most western societies. “Ageing in place” is seen as a goal that accommodates the preferences of both older people themselves and society. Homecare (HC) is one of the key means to support older people who need regular external help to remain living at home. Underlying the provision of homecare, there is an implicit or explicit goal to enhance the general well-being of the clients. However, there is still little known, especially from the perspective of old people themselves, about the ways that different types of homecare and how they are organised and delivered can impact on the quality of life (QoL) of the clients.

Although patterns of homecare provision may vary considerably between European countries, reflecting different approaches to provision within “mixed economies of care”, services usually range from help for housekeeping and daily activities of living to nursing care at home, as well as social, emotional and psychological support to maintain independence and autonomy. During the last two decades, most European countries have introduced policies for prioritising or targeting client needs in order to allocate the available scarce resources to those in most need (e.g. Evers & Svetlik, 1993; Pacolet, Bouten, Lanoye, & Versieck, 1998). For example, in Finland, a shift from a publicly provided social model of home help towards a more medically orientated care at home is apparent, as well as a shift from public provision towards a more mixed economy, involving providers from both the public and private sectors (Vaarama & Noro, 2006). For “better targeting of care”, eligibility for formal homecare is increasingly targeted on those people with highest needs in respect to personal daily activities (PADL—help with personal hygiene, going to the toilet, etc.), whereas those persons needing help in housekeeping and other instrumental daily activities (IADL) are increasingly likely to be cared for by families or to buy the services privately. Importantly, services that support the psycho-social and environmental and housing needs of clients tend to be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldock, J. C., & Hadlow, J. (2002). Self-talk versus needs-talk: An exploration of the priorities of housebound older people. Quality in Ageing, 3(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes, & M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging. Perspectives from the behavioural sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., & Mayer, K. K. (Eds.). (1999). The Berlin aging study. Aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birren, J. E., & Dieckmann, L. (1991). Concepts and contents of QoL in later years: An overview. In J. E. Birren, J. E. Lubben, J. Cichowlas Rowe, & D. E. Deutchmann (Eds.), The concept and measurement of QoL in the frail elderly. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (2004). Measuring health: A review of QoL measurement scales (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing QoL. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), QoL for people with disabilities. Models, research and practice. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., Bebbington, A., & Charnley, H. in collaboration with Baines, B., Ferlie, E. Hughes, M. & Twigg, J. (1990). Resources, needs and outcomes in community-based care. A comparative study of the production of welfare for elderly people in ten local authorities in England and Wales. PSSRU, University of Kent at Canterbury. Avebury: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, I. R., & Russel, A. (Eds.). (1998). The anthropology of welfare. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., & Svetlik, I. (Eds.). (1993). Balancing pluralism. New welfare mixes in care for the elderly. Vienna, Avebury: European Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, L., & Maselino-Okai, C. (1986). Senior monitor. An index of the quality of nursing care for senior citizens on hospital wards. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic Products Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, Y., & Hallberg, I. R. (2001). Perspectives of elderly people receiving home help on health, care and QoL. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(2), 61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B. (1990). QoL. In S. M. Peace (Ed.), Researching social gerontology: Concepts, methods and issues (pp. 46–58). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R., & Kane, R. (2001). Emerging issues in chronic care. In: R. Binstock, & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences. USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Centre Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P. (1991). A multidimensional view of QoL in frail elders. In J. E. Birren, J. E. Lubben, J. C. Rowe, & D. E. Deutchman (Eds.), The concept and measurement of QoL in frail elders (pp. 3–27). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwenstein, A., & Ogg, J. (Eds.). (2003). OASIS. Old age and autonomy: The role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. Haifa: University of Haifa. <www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf>.

  • Netten, A., Francis, J., Jones, K., & Bebbington, A. (2004). Performance and quality: User experiences of home care services. Final report. PSSRU Discussion Paper 2104/3. April 2004. <www.PSSRU.ac.uk>.

  • Pacolet, J., Bouten, R., Lanoye, H., & Versieck, K. (1998). The state of the debate on social protection for dependency in old age in the 15 EU member states and Norway. Leuven: Hoger Instituut voor de arbeid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paljärvi, S., Rissanen, S., & Sinkkonen, S. (2003). Kotihoidon sisältö ja laatu vanhusasiakkaiden, omaisten ja työntekijöiden arvioimana—Seurantatutkimus Kuopion kotihoidosta (The contents and quality of home care as evaluated by the older clients, their relatives and the care professionals. A follow-up study of home care in the city of kuopio, Finland). Gerontologia, 2, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkälä, K., Routasalo, P., Kautiainen, H., Savikko, N., & Tilvis, R. (2005). Ikääntyneiden yksinäisyys. Psykososiaalisen ryhmäkuntoutuksen vaikuttavuus. (Loneliness in old age. The effectiveness of psycho-social rehabilitation). Vanhustyön keskusliitto. Geriatrisen kuntoutuksen tutkimus- ja kehittämishanke. Tutkimusraportti 11. Vaajakoski: Gummerus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S., & The WHOQOL Group (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. QoL Research 14, 2197–2214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skevington, S. M., Lofty, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organisation’s WHOQOL-BREF QoL assessment. A report from the WHOQOL group. QoL Research, 13, 299–310.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solem, P. E. (2003). Forskningsinstrumentene I norLAG. (Research instruments in norLAG). Den norske studien av livslöp, aldring og generasjon. Oslo: NOVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomé, B., Dykes, A-K., & Rahm Hallberg, I. (2003). Home care with regard to definition, care recipients, content and outcome: Systematic literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(6), 860–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M., & Noro, A. (2006). Care of older persons. In S. Koskinen, A. Aromaa, J. Huttunen, & J. Teperi (Eds.), Health in Finland. Helsinki: KTL, Stakes and Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaarama, M., Pieper, R., & Sixsmith, A. (2007). Care-related QoL in old age. Conceptual and empirical exploration. In H. Mollenkopf, & A. Walker (Eds.), Quality of life in Old Age. International and Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp. 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vaarama, M., Tiit, EM. (2008). Quality of Life of Older Homecare Clients. In: Vaarama, M., Pieper, R., Sixsmith, A. (eds) Care-Related Quality of Life in Old Age. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72169-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72169-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72168-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72169-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics