Abstract
Microbial communities are key components of all ecosystems, but characterization of their complete genomic structure remains challenging. Typical analysis tends to elude the complexity of the mixes in terms of species, strains, as well as extrachromosomal DNA molecules. Recently, approaches have been developed that bins DNA contigs into individual genomes and episomes according to their 3D contact frequencies. Those contacts are quantified by chromosome conformation capture experiments (3C, Hi-C), also known as proximity-ligation approaches, applied to metagenomics samples. Here, we present a simple computational pipeline that allows to recover high-quality Metagenomics Assemble Genomes (MAGs) starting from metagenomic 3C or Hi-C datasets and a metagenome assembly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bork P, Bowler C, de Vargas C, Gorsky G, Karsenti E, Wincker P (2015) Tara oceans studies plankton at planetary scale. Science 348:873–873
Almeida A, Mitchell AL, Boland M, Forster SC, Gloor GB, Tarkowska A, Lawley TD, Finn RD (2019) A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 568:499
Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH (2013) Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:789–799
Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW (2017) Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 2:1533
Quince C, Walker AW, Simpson JT, Loman NJ, Segata N (2017) Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat Biotechnol 35:833–844
Olson ND, Treangen TJ, Hill CM, Cepeda-Espinoza V, Ghurye J, Koren S, Pop M (2019) Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes. Brief Bioinform 20(4):1140–1150
Frank JA, Pan Y, Tooming-Klunderud A, Eijsink VGH, McHardy AC, Nederbragt AJ, Pope PB (2016) Improved metagenome assemblies and taxonomic binning using long-read circular consensus sequence data. Sci Rep 6:25373
Beaulaurier J, Zhu S, Deikus G, Mogno I, Zhang X-S, Davis-Richardson A, Canepa R, Triplett EW, Faith JJ, Sebra R et al (2018) Metagenomic binning and association of plasmids with bacterial host genomes using DNA methylation. Nat Biotechnol 36:61–69
Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, Lahti L, Loman NJ, Andersson AF, Quince C (2014) Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods 11:1144–1146
Marbouty M, Cournac A, Flot J-F, Marie-Nelly H, Mozziconacci J, Koszul R (2014) Metagenomic chromosome conformation capture (meta3C) unveils the diversity of chromosome organization in microorganisms. elife 3:e03318
Beitel CW, Froenicke L, Lang JM, Korf IF, Michelmore RW, Eisen JA, Darling AE (2014) Strain- and plasmid-level deconvolution of a synthetic metagenome by sequencing proximity ligation products. PeerJ 2:e415
Burton JN, Liachko I, Dunham MJ, Shendure J (2014) Species-level deconvolution of metagenome assemblies with Hi-C–based contact probability maps. G3 (Bethesda) 4:1339–1346. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.011825
Džunková M, Low SJ, Daly JN, Deng L, Rinke C, Hugenholtz P (2019) Defining the human gut host–phage network through single-cell viral tagging. Nat Microbiol 4:2192–2203
Alneberg J, Karlsson CMG, Divne A-M, Bergin C, Homa F, Lindh MV, Hugerth LW, Ettema TJG, Bertilsson S, Andersson AF et al (2018) Genomes from uncultivated prokaryotes: a comparison of metagenome-assembled and single-amplified genomes. Microbiome 6:173
Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295:1306–1311
Foutel-Rodier T, Thierry A, Koszul R, Marbouty M (2018) Generation of a metagenomics proximity ligation 3C library of a mammalian gut microbiota. Meth Enzymol 612:183–195
Flot J-F, Marie-Nelly H, Koszul R (2015) Contact genomics: scaffolding and phasing (meta)genomes using chromosome 3D physical signatures. FEBS Lett 589(20 Pt A):2966–2974
Marie-Nelly H, Marbouty M, Cournac A, Liti G, Fischer G, Zimmer C, Koszul R (2014) Filling annotation gaps in yeast genomes using genome-wide contact maps. Bioinformatics 30:2105–2113
Marbouty M, Koszul R (2015) Metagenome analysis exploiting high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (3C) data. Trends Genet 31:673–682
Marbouty M, Baudry L, Cournac A, Koszul R (2017) Scaffolding bacterial genomes and probing host-virus interactions in gut microbiome by proximity ligation (chromosome capture) assay. Sci Adv 3:e1602105
Stewart RD, Auffret MD, Warr A, Wiser AH, Press MO, Langford KW, Liachko I, Snelling TJ, Dewhurst RJ, Walker AW et al (2018) Assembly of 913 microbial genomes from metagenomic sequencing of the cow rumen. Nat Commun 9:870
Baudry L, Foutel-Rodier T, Thierry A, Koszul R, Marbouty M (2019) MetaTOR: a computational pipeline to recover high-quality metagenomic bins from mammalian gut proximity-ligation (meta3C) libraries. Front Genet 10:753. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00753/full. Accessed 15 June 2020
Press MO, Wiser AH, Kronenberg ZN, Langford KW, Shakya M, Lo CC, Mueller KA, Sullivan ST, Chain PSG, Liachko I (2017) Hi-C deconvolution of a human gut microbiome yields high-quality draft genomes and reveals plasmid-genome interactions. bioRxiv, 198713
Stalder T, Press MO, Sullivan S, Liachko I, Top EM (2019) Linking the resistome and plasmidome to the microbiome. ISME J 13:2437–2446
Marbouty M, Baudry L, Cournac A, Koszul R (2017) Scaffolding bacterial genomes and probing host-virus interactions in gut microbiome by proximity ligation (chromosome capture) assay. Sci Adv 3:e1602105. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315449/. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
Marbouty M, Thierry A, Millot G, Koszul R (in press) MetaHiC phage-bacteria infection network reveals active cycling phages of the healthy human gut. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60608
Baudry L, Foutel-Rodier T, Thierry A, Koszul R, Marbouty M (2019) MetaTOR: a computational pipeline to recover high-quality metagenomic bins from mammalian gut proximity-ligation (meta3C) libraries. Front Genet 10:753. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00753/full. Accessed 29 Aug 2019
DeMaere MZ, Darling AE (2019) bin3C: exploiting Hi-C sequencing data to accurately resolve metagenome-assembled genomes. Genome Biol 20:46
Yaffe E, Relman DA (2020) Tracking microbial evolution in the human gut using Hi-C reveals extensive horizontal gene transfer, persistence and adaptation. Nat Microbiol 5(2):343–353
DeMaere MZ, Darling AE (2016) Deconvoluting simulated metagenomes: the performance of hard- and soft- clustering algorithms applied to metagenomic chromosome conformation capture (3C). PeerJ 4:e2676
Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W (2015) MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA (2017) metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res, gr.213959.116
Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, Wang Z (2015) MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3:e1165
Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:8577–8582
Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech 2008:P10008
Fortunato S, Barthélemy M (2007) Resolution limit in community detection. PNAS 104:36–41
Marie-Nelly H, Marbouty M, Cournac A, Flot J-F, Liti G, Parodi DP, Syan S, Guillén N, Margeot A, Zimmer C et al (2014) High-quality genome (re)assembly using chromosomal contact data. Nat Commun 5:5695
Baudry L, Guiglielmoni N, Marie-Nelly H, Cormier A, Marbouty M, Avia K, Mie YL, Godfroy O, Sterck L, Cock JM et al (2020) instaGRAAL: chromosome-level quality scaffolding of genomes using a proximity ligation-based scaffolder. Genome Biol 21:148
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW (2015) CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by funding to R.K. from the European Research Council under the Horizon 2020 Program (ERC grant agreement 771813) and Agence Nationale pour la Recherche JPI-EC-AMR STARCS (ANR-16-JPEC-0003-05).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Marbouty, M., Koszul, R. (2022). Metagenomes Binning Using Proximity-Ligation Data. In: Bicciato, S., Ferrari, F. (eds) Hi-C Data Analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2301. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1390-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1390-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1389-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1390-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols