Abstract
Type I CRISPR-Cas systems represent the most common and diverse type of these prokaryotic defense systems and are being harnessed for a growing set of applications. As these systems rely on multi-protein effector complexes, their characterization remains challenging. Here, we report a rapid and straightforward method to characterize these systems in a cell-free transcription-translation (TXTL) system. A ribonucleoprotein complex is produced and binds to its target next to a recognized PAM, thereby preventing the targeted sequence from being cleaved by a restriction enzyme. Selection for uncleaved targeted plasmids leads to an enrichment of recognized sequences within a PAM library. This assay will aid the exploration of CRISPR-Cas diversity and evolution and help contribute new systems for CRISPR technologies and applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H et al (2007) CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315:1709–1712
Sorek R, Lawrence CM, Wiedenheft B (2013) CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu Rev Biochem 82:237–266
Heler R, Marraffini LA, Bikard D (2014) Adapting to new threats: the generation of memory by CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Mol Microbiol 93:1–9
Yosef I, Shitrit D, Goren MG et al (2013) DNA motifs determining the efficiency of adaptation into the Escherichia coli CRISPR array. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:14396–14401
Wang J, Li J, Zhao H et al (2015) Structural and mechanistic basis of PAM-dependent spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems. Cell 163:840–853
Charpentier E, Richter H, van der Oost J, White MF (2015) Biogenesis pathways of RNA guides in archaeal and bacterial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:428–441
Leenay RT, Beisel CL (2017) Deciphering, communicating, and engineering the CRISPR PAM. J Mol Biol 429:177–191
Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ (2010) CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Genet 11:181–190
Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J et al (2020) Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:67–83
Brouns SJJ, Jore MM, Lundgren M et al (2008) Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 321:960–964
Westra ER, van Erp PBG, Künne T et al (2012) CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. Mol Cell 46:595–605
Csörgő B, León LM, Chau-Ly IJ et al (2020) A compact Cascade-Cas3 system for targeted genome engineering. Nat Methods 17:1183–1190
Chen Y, Liu J, Zhi S et al (2020) Repurposing type I–F CRISPR–Cas system as a transcriptional activation tool in human cells. Nat Commun 11:1–14
Dolan AE, Hou Z, Xiao Y et al (2019) Introducing a spectrum of long-range genomic deletions in human embryonic stem cells using type I CRISPR-Cas. Mol Cell 74:936–950.e5
Xu Z, Li M, Li Y et al (2019) Native CRISPR-Cas-mediated genome editing enables dissecting and sensitizing clinical multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Cell Rep 29:1707–1717.e3
Luo ML, Mullis AS, Leenay RT, Beisel CL (2015) Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression. Nucleic Acids Res 43:674–681
Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Barrangou R (2020) Characterization and applications of Type I CRISPR-Cas systems. Biochem Soc Trans 48:15–23
Morisaka H, Yoshimi K, Okuzaki Y et al (2019) CRISPR-Cas3 induces broad and unidirectional genome editing in human cells. Nat Commun 10:5302
Cheng F, Gong L, Zhao D et al (2017) Harnessing the native type I-B CRISPR-Cas for genome editing in a polyploid archaeon. J Genet Genomics 44:541–548
Li Y, Pan S, Zhang Y et al (2016) Harnessing type I and type III CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res 44:e34
Cameron P, Coons MM, Klompe SE et al (2019) Harnessing type I CRISPR-Cas systems for genome engineering in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 37:1471–1477
Pickar-Oliver A, Black JB, Lewis MM et al (2019) Targeted transcriptional modulation with type I CRISPR-Cas systems in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 37:1493–1501
Pyne ME, Bruder MR, Moo-Young M et al (2016) Harnessing heterologous and endogenous CRISPR-Cas machineries for efficient markerless genome editing in Clostridium. Sci Rep 6:25666
Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Goh YJ, Pan M et al (2019) Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system in Lactobacillus crispatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:15774–15783
Zheng Y, Han J, Wang B et al (2019) Characterization and repurposing of the endogenous type I-F CRISPR-Cas system of Zymomonas mobilis for genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 47:11461–11475
Rath D, Amlinger L, Hoekzema M et al (2015) Efficient programmable gene silencing by Cascade. Nucleic Acids Res 43:237–246
Gomaa AA, Klumpe HE, Luo ML et al (2014) Programmable removal of bacterial strains by use of genome-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems. MBio 5:e00928–e00913
Yosef I, Manor M, Kiro R, Qimron U (2015) Temperate and lytic bacteriophages programmed to sensitize and kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7267–7272
Silverman AD, Karim AS, Jewett MC (2020) Cell-free gene expression: an expanded repertoire of applications. Nat Rev Genet 21:151–170
Liao C, Ttofali F, Slotkowski RA et al (2019) Modular one-pot assembly of CRISPR arrays enables library generation and reveals factors influencing crRNA biogenesis. Nat Commun 10:2948
Liao C, Slotkowski RA, Achmedov T, Beisel CL (2019) The Francisella novicida Cas12a is sensitive to the structure downstream of the terminal repeat in CRISPR arrays. RNA Biol 16:404–412
Marshall R, Beisel CL, Noireaux V (2020) Rapid testing of CRISPR nucleases and guide RNAs in an E. coli cell-free transcription-translation system. STAR Protocols 1:100003
Marshall R, Maxwell CS, Collins SP et al (2018) Rapid and scalable characterization of CRISPR technologies using an E. coli cell-free transcription-translation system. Mol Cell 69:146–157.e3
Bondy-Denomy J, Pawluk A, Maxwell KL, Davidson AR (2013) Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system. Nature 493:429–432
Davidson AR, Lu W-T, Stanley SY et al (2020) Anti-CRISPRs: protein inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas systems. Annu Rev Biochem 89:309–332
Wandera KG, Collins SP, Wimmer F et al (2020) An enhanced assay to characterize anti-CRISPR proteins using a cell-free transcription-translation system. Methods 172:42–50
Watters KE, Fellmann C, Bai HB et al (2018) Systematic discovery of natural CRISPR-Cas12a inhibitors. Science 362:236–239
Collias D, Beisel CL (2021) CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease. Nat Commun 12:555
Maxwell CS, Jacobsen T, Marshall R et al (2018) A detailed cell-free transcription-translation-based assay to decipher CRISPR protospacer-adjacent motifs. Methods 143:48–57
Leenay RT, Maksimchuk KR, Slotkowski RA et al (2016) Identifying and visualizing functional PAM diversity across CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell 62:137–147
Sitaraman K, Esposito D, Klarmann G et al (2004) A novel cell-free protein synthesis system. J Biotechnol 110:257–263
Marshall R, Maxwell CS, Collins SP et al (2017) Short DNA containing χ sites enhances DNA stability and gene expression in E. coli cell-free transcription-translation systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:2137–2141
Shin J, Noireaux V (2010) Efficient cell-free expression with the endogenous E. coli RNA polymerase and sigma factor 70. J Biol Eng 4:8
Schneider TD, Stephens RM (1990) Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6097–6100
Collias D, Leenay RT, Slotkowski RA et al (2020) A positive, growth-based PAM screen identifies noncanonical motifs recognized by the S. pyogenes Cas9. Sci Adv 6:eabb4054
Wimmer F, Mougiakos I, Englert F, Beisel CL (2021) Rapid cell-free characterization of multi-subunit CRISPR effectors and transposons. bioRxiv 2021.10.18.464778; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.18.464778
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the SPP 2141 priority program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BE 6703/1-1 to C.L.B.). A portion of this research was performed under the JGI-EMSL Collaborative Science Initiative and used resources at the DOE Joint Genome Institute and the Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory, which are DOE Office of Science User Facilities. Both facilities are sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research and operated under Contract Nos. DE-AC02-05CH11231 (JGI) and DE-AC05-76RL01830 (EMSL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Wimmer, F., Englert, F., Beisel, C.L. (2022). A TXTL-Based Assay to Rapidly Identify PAMs for CRISPR-Cas Systems with Multi-Protein Effector Complexes. In: Karim, A.S., Jewett, M.C. (eds) Cell-Free Gene Expression. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2433. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1998-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1998-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1997-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1998-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols