Abstract
Nigeria is at an historic conjuncture, one that poses problems as well as offering opportunities for both political analysts and activists. The country is now two decades old and just another two decades away from the twenty-first century. In its first twenty years of de jure independence, the territory and political economy of Nigeria were administered by several elements within the reconstituted ruling class; initially by combined political-entrepreneurial fractions but for the most part by three distinct military administrations.
Our country is the largest single unit in Africa … we are not going to abdicate the position in which God Almighty has placed us … The whole black continent is looking up to this country [Nigeria] to liberate it from thralldom.
Jaja Wachuku [1]
Our uneven relationship with Europe, and now including Northern America, remains basically unchanged. We continue to be trading posts which supply primary products in exchange for processed goods. The existence of import substitution industries does not detract from this fact. These trading posts are run and maintained by our citizens. These agents can be grouped into four: (a) Intellectual trading post agents, (b) Commercial trading post agents, (c) Bureaucratic trading post agents, (d) Technical trading post agents. The activities of these agents constitute impediments to Black African development.
Lt. General Olusegun Obasanjo [2]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Jaja Wachuku, first Minister of Foreign Affairs, in Nigerian Parliament, House of Representatives Debates, January 1960, column 54.
See, for instance, the strikingly titled but otherwise disappointing book by Joseph Wayas, Nigeria’s Leadership Role in Africa (London: Macmillan, 1979).
L. Gray Cowan, ‘Nigerian Foreign Policy’ in R. O. Tilman and Taylor Cole (eds), Nigerian Political Scene (Durham: Duke University Press, 1962) p. 116.
A. Bolaji Akinyemi, Foreign Policy and Federalism: the Nigerian Experience (Ibadan University Press, 1974) p. 191.
Olajide Aluko, ‘Nigeria’s Role in Inter-African Relations with Special Reference to the Organisation of African Unity’, African Affairs, 72 (287), April 1973, p. 162.
Jean Herskovits, ‘Dateline Nigeria: a Black Power’, Foreign Policy, 29, Winter 1977–8, p. 171.
Ikenna Nzimiro, ‘The Political and Social Implications of Multinational Corporations in Nigeria’ in Carl Widstrand (ed.), Multinational Firms in Africa (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1975) p. 210.
For a general comparison of the contents and claims of these two modes see Timothy M. Shaw, ‘Foreign Policy, Political Economy and the Future: Reflections on Africa in the World System’, African Affairs, 79 (315), April 1980, pp. 260–8. The notion of ‘foreign policy’ employed here is, of course, a broad one: all interactions with and policies towards ‘external’ actors, whether they be individuals, classes, other non-state actors, other states, regional institutions and universal organisations. This goes beyond official relations and ideologies to embrace a wide variety of ‘transnational’ linkages (see notes 58 and 61 below).
For a comparative discussion about the analytic and political debates over the intention and direction of Zambian foreign policy see Timothy M. Shaw, ‘Dilemmas of Dependence and (under) Development: Conflicts and Choices in Zambia’s Present and Prospective Foreign Policy’, Africa Today, 26 (4), October/December 1979, pp. 43–65.
Ray Ofoegbu, The Nigerian Foreign Policy (Enugu: Star, 1979) p. ix.
Gavin Williams, ‘Introduction’ in Gavin Williams (ed.), Nigeria: Economy and Society (London: Rex Collings, 1976) pp. 3–4.
A. Bolaji Akinyemi, ‘Nigerian Foreign Policy in 1975: National Interest Redefined’ in Oyeleye Oyediran (ed.), Survey of Nigerian Affairs, 1975 (Ibadan: OUP, 1978) p. 112. Olajide Aluko is one of very few scholars in either traditional or radical schools to argue that the Murtala/Obasanjo period represents a continuity rather than a change (see Aluko, ‘The ‘New’ Nigerian Foreign Policy: Developments Since the Downfall of General Gowon’, Round Table, 66, October 1976, pp. 405–14).
For a succinct and suggestive introduction to the industrial, exchange, regional, military, social and theoretical implications of NICs see Raimo Vayrynen, ‘Economic and Military Position of Regional Power Centres in the International System’, Journal of Peace Research, 16 (4), 1979, pp. 349–69.
On this role see Orobola Fasehun, Nigerian Politics and the Roles of Nigeria in the OAU, 1963–1976 (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, January 1979).
On national role orientations in general see Kal Holsti, ‘National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14 (3), September 1970, pp. 233–309.
On power politics see the classic study by Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations (New York: Knopf, 1967, fourth edn).
Ibrahim A. Gambari, ‘Nigeria and the World: a Growing Internal Stability, Wealth and External Influence’, Journal of International Affairs, 29 (2), 1975, p. 164.
Julius E. Okolo and Winston E. Langley, ‘The Changing Nigerian Foreign Policy’, World Affairs, 135, Spring 1973, p. 324.
A. Bolaji Akinyemi, ‘Introduction’ in his collection on Nigeria and the World: Readings in Nigerian Foreign Policy (Ibadan: OUP for NIIA, 1978) pp. x–xi.
Segun Osoba, ‘The Deepening Crisis of the Nigerian National Bourgeoisie’, Review of African Political Economy, 13, May–August 1978, p. 65.
Sayre P. Schatz, Nigerian Capitalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977) pp. 1 and 2.
For introductions to this world system perspective see Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic, 1974) and
The Capitalist World Economy (Cambridge University Press, 1979);
and Daniel Chirot, Social Change in the Twentieth Century (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977).
Barry B. Hughes and Patricia A. Strauch, ‘The Future of Development in Nigeria and the Sahel: Projections from the World Integrated Model (WIM)’ in Timothy M. Shaw (ed.), Alternative Futures for Africa (Boulder: Westview, 1981) pp. 179–200.
Patrick F. Wilmot, In Search of Nationhood: the Theory and Practice of Nationalism in Africa (Ibadan: Lantern, 1979) p. 123.
For comparable attempts to contrast traditional and radical approaches to regionalism, nonalignment, NIEO and foreign policy see Timothy M. Shaw, ‘Towards a Political Economy of Regional Integration and Inequality in Africa’, Nigerian Journal of International Studies, 2 (2), October 1978; ‘The Political Economy of Nonalignment: from Dependence to Self-Reliance’, International Conference on NonAlignment, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs, January 1980;
‘Dependence to (Inter) Dependence: Review of Debate on the (New) International Economic Order’, Alternatives, 4 (4), March 1979, pp. 557–78; and
with Olajide Aluko, ‘Introduction: the Political Economy of African Foreign Policy’ in Timothy M. Shaw and Olajide Aluko (eds), The Political Economy of African Foreign Policy: Comparative Analysis (Aldershot: Gower, 1982).
On these see, for example, J. N. Garba, ‘The New Nigerian Foreign Policy’, Quarterly Journal of Administration, 11 (3), April 1977, pp. 135–46.
See also Martin Dickson, ‘Foreign Policy: New Dynamism’, Financial Times Nigerian Survey, 1 October 1979, p. ix.
For more on Africa’s middle powers see Timothy M. Shaw, ‘Kenya and South Africa: “Sub-imperialist” States’, Orbis, 21 92), Summer 1977, pp. 375–94, and
‘Inequalities and Interdependence in Africa and Latin America: Sub-imperialism and Semi-industrialism in the Semiperiphery’, Cultures et Developpement, 10 (2), 1978, pp. 231–63.
Douglas G. Anglin, ‘Nigeria: Political Non-alignment and Economic Alignment’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 2 (2), June 1964, p. 262.
For general theoretical work on the Third World state and foreign policy see Biplab Dasgupta, ‘Interpretation of Foreign Policy: an Alternative Approach’, International Round Table on Non-Alignment, Calcutta, November 1979, and Timothy M. Shaw, ‘The Political Economy of African International Relations’, Issue, 5 (4), Winter 1975, pp. 29–38.
Gambari, ‘Nigeria and the World’, p. 139. Cf. Geoffrey Hunt and Christos Theodoropoulos, ‘Nigeria: Will Civilian Rule Bring Democracy?’, African Communist, 79, fourth quarter 1979, pp. 88–101
Thomas J. Biersteker, Distortion or Development? Contending Perspectives on the Multinational Corporation (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1978) p. 161.
A further, more fascist variant of this reformist position is that an authoritarian response would serve to contain, if not remove, social pressures; see Claude Ake, Revolutionary Pressures in Africa (London: Zed, 1978) p. 107.
Sayre P. Schatz, Nigerian Capitalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), p. 46.
There is considerably more writing on Nigerian foreign policy than on the foreign policy of any other African state (except, perhaps, the ‘special’ case of South Africa). There are also more trained and professionally active social scientists in Nigeria (particularly in the fields of political science and international relations) than in any other country on the continent (let alone the large number of Nigerian scholars still in the diaspora!). Yet because of the widespread adoption of traditional modes of analysis, Nigerian scholars have yet to have a proportional impact on the frontiers of and debates within these sub-fields. See Mark W. DeLancey, ‘The Study of African International Relations’ in his collection on Aspects of International Relations in Africa (Bloomington: Indiana University, African Studies Programme, 1979) pp. 1–38, especially 8–9.
For an interesting overview of this intense period of change and continuity see A. Bolaji Akinyemi, ‘Mohammed/Obasanjo Foreign Policy’ in Oyeleye Oyediran (ed.), Nigerian Government and Politics under Military Rule 1966–79 (London: Macmillan, 1979) pp. 150–68; cf. note 12 above.
On the US case see Laurence Shoup and William Minter, Imperial Brains Trust: the Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (New York: Monthly Review, 1977).
See Holly Sklar (ed.), Trilateralism: Elite Planning for World Management (Boston: South End, 1979).
Typical of the new concerns amongst established scholars for transnational, ecological, developmental and economic factors are Seyom Brown, New Forces in World Politics (Washington: Brookings, 1974);
Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977),
Joan E. Spero, The Politics of International Economic Relations (New York: St. Martins, 1977); and
David H. Blake and Ronald H. Walters, The Politics of Global Economic Relations (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1976).
See also Timothy M. Shaw, Towards an International Political Economy for the 1980s: from Dependence to (Inter) Dependence (Halifax: Centre for Foreign Policy Studies, 1980).
See the powerful critiques in Claude Ake, Social Science as Imperialism: the Theory of Political Development (Ibadan University Press, 1979) especially pp. 1–98 and Nzimiro, The Crisis in the Social Sciences, especially pp. 17–26.
See Richard W. Mansbach, Yale H. Ferguson and Donald E. Lampert, The Web of World Politics: Non-state Actors in the Global System (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1976) p. 31.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 Timothy M. Shaw and Olajide Aluko
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shaw, T.M., Fasehun, O. (1983). Nigeria in the World System: Alternative Approaches, Explanations and Projections. In: Shaw, T.M., Aluko, O. (eds) Nigerian Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06301-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06301-7_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06303-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06301-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)