Abstract
Following tradition and for the sake of convenience in contrasting French with other languages, much of the research and theory have assumed that French has a stress located on the last full syllable of every lexical word, an “accent de mot intrinsèque” (Rousselot, 1924). Lexical words are opposed to function words, such as articles and auxiliaries, which do not have a potentially stressable final syllable (Garde, 1968). In continuous speech, the “accent de mot” or word accent of a number of lexical words is often not fully realized, or not realized at all, due to modifications dictated by the larger patterns of the speech measure or phrase (a phenomenon not particular to French, Heffner, 1950:228). Only the last syllable of the last word in a group of words, lengthened and often superimposed with a fundamental frequency (Fo) rise or a Fo peak as the expression of continuation, is regularly perceived as prominent, giving rise to the so-called “accent de groupe” (Delattre, 1966:75). There is no clear cut definition of this “groupe”. A group generally constitutes a unit of meaning, a sense-group. The same sentence can be chunked into more or less units of meaning, depending on the rate of speaking and on the speaker (Grammont, 1914; Coustenoble and Armstrong, 1934; Delattre, 1966:65; Vaissière, 1974:216; Vaissière, 1989; see also Hirst & Di Cristo, 1984). Prominence can be perceived also at the beginning of the word, as a consequence of emphasis (Grammont, 1914), of the “accent intellectuel” (Marouzeau, 1934; Roudet, 1910), as a regular characteristic of professional announcers (Leon, 1971; Fonagy & Fonagy, 1976), and in certain dialects (Fouché, 1936; Carton, 1976).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abercrombie, D., (1967), ELEMENTS OF GENERAL PHONETICS, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
Allen, G., & Hakwins, S., (1978), “The development of phonological rhythm”, in SYLLABLES AND SEGMENTS, A. Bell, J. Hopper, (eds), Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing C, 173–188.
Allen, G.D., (1975), “Speech rhythm: its relation to performance universals and articulatory timing”, J. Phon., 3, 75–86.
Armstrong, L.E. & Ward, I.C., (1926), A HANDBOOK OF ENGLISH INTONATION, Cambridge.
Bally, C., (1926), “Le rythme linguistique et sa signification sociale”, ler Congrès du Rythme, Genève, 253–265.
Bolton„ T.L., (1894), “Rhythm”, Amer. J. Psychol., 6, 145–238.
Butterfield, S. & Cutler, A, (1988), “Segmentation errors by human listeners: evidence for a prosodic segmentation strategy”, Proceedings. of Speech’ 88., Edinburgh, Vol. 3, 827–833.
Carton, F., (1967), “Pente et rupture mélodique en français régional du Nord”, VI Int. Cong. Phon. Sc., 237–241.
Carton, F., (1976), “Insistance dialectale”, Studio Phonetica, 12, 60–92.
Coustenoble, H.N., & Armstrong, L.E., (1934), STUDIES IN FRENCH INTONATION, W. Heffner and Sons Ltd, Cambridge, England.
Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S., (1989), “Natural speech cues to word segmentation under difficult listening conditions”, Eurospeech 89, European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Paris, Vol. 2, 372–375.
Dauer, R.M., (1983), “Stress-timing and syllabe-timing reanalyzed?”, J. Phon., 51–62.
Delattre, P., (1965), COMPARING THE PHONETIC FEATURES OF ENGLISH, GERMAN, SPANISH AND FRENCH, Julius Gross Verlag.
Delattre, P., (1966), STUDIES IN FRENCH AND COMPARATIVE PHONETICS, Selected papers in French and in English, Mouton, London, The Hague, Paris.
Demany, L., MCKenzie, B., & Vurpillot, E. (1977), “Rhythm perception in early infancy”,Nature, 266, 5066, 7, 118–9.
Di Cristo, A., & Hirst, D., (1986), “French micromelody: analysis and synthesis”, Phonetica, 43, 11–30.
Duez, D, & Nishinuma, Y., (1984), “Some evidence of rhythmic patterns of spoken French”, PERILUS, 1984–5, 30–40.
Duez, D., (1978), ESSAI SUR LA PROSODIE DU DISCOURS POLITIQUE, Thèse de 3ième Cycle, Univ. de Paris I II.
Duez, D., (1987), CONTRIBUTION A L’ETUDE DE LA STRUCTURATION TEMPORELLE DE LA PAROLE EN FRANCAIS, Thèse d’Etat, Université de Provence.
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., & Nord, L., (1990), “Segmental durations within a prosodic frame in Swedish, French and English”, PHONUM I, Reports from the Department de Phonetics, University of Umeä, Sweden, 42–45.
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., Nord, L., (forthcoming), “Duration correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English”, in Proceedings of the Second Seminar on Speech Production, Leeds, May 1990, To appear in J. Phon.
Fodor, J.J., & Bever, T., (1965), “The psychological reality of linguistics segments”, J. Verb. Learn. Behavior., 4, 414–420.
Fonagy, I, & Fonagy, J., (1976), “Prosodie professionnelle et changements prosodiques”, Le français moderne, 44, 193–228.
Fonagy, I., (1980a), “L’accent français: accent probalitaire (dynamique d’un changement prosodique”, in L’ACCENT EN FRANCAIS CONTEMPORAIN, Studio Phonetica 15, Fonagy, I. & Léon, P. (Eds.).
Fouché, P., (1936), “Les diverses sortes de français Au point de vue phonétique”, Le Français Moderne, 4.
Fraisse, P., (1956), LES STRUCTURES RHYTMIQUES, Louvain, Publications Universitaires.
Fraisse, P., (1974), PSYCHOLOGIE DU RYTHME, Collection SUP, Presses Universitaires de France.
Grammont, G., (1914), TRAITE PRATIQUE DE PRONONCIATION FRANCAISE, Paris.
Grosjean, F., Grosjean, L., & Lane, H., (1979), “The patterns of silences: performance structures in sentence production”, Cognitive Psychology, 11, 58–81.
Heffner, R-M., S., (1950), GENERAL PHONETICS, The Univ. of Wincons in Press.
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A., (1984), “French intonation: a parametric approach”, Die Neueren Sprachen, 83,5,554–569.
Jones, D., (1909), AN OUTLINE OF ENGLISH PHONETICS, W. Heffner and Sons Ltd, Cambridge, England.
Klatt, D.H., (1976), “Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence”, J. Ac. Soc. Am., 1208–1221.
Konopcynski, G., (1988), “Les oppositions intonatives chez l’enfant préverbal”, in Toronto Working Papers of Speech and Voice Society, Vol. 8, 5–29.
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D.E., (1960), “Perception of sequence in auditory events”, J. Exp. Psychology, 13, 162–170.
Lea, W.A., (1974), PROSODIC AIDS TO SPEECH RECOGNITION: A SUMMARY OF RESULTS TO DATE, Sperry Univac Technical Report, No. PX 11087.
Lehiste, I., (1977), “Isochrony reconsidered”, J. Phon ., 5, 253–263.
Lehiste, I., Olive, J.P., & Streeter, L.A., (1976), “Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences”, J. Ac. Soc. Am., 60, 1199–1202.
Léon, P., (1971), “La joncture ex terne en français: nature et fonctions linguistiques et expressives”, Essai de Phonostylistique, Studia Phonetica, 4, Didier, 57–66.
Liberman, M. & Prince, A., (1977), “On stress and linguistic rhythm”, Ling. Ing., Vol. 8, Number 2, 249–336.
Lieberman, Ph., (1967), INTONATION, PERCEPTION AND LANGUAGE, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Marouzeau, J., (1934), “Accent d’insistance affectif et intellectuel”, Le Français Moderne, 2, 120–123.
Mertens, P., (1987), L’INTONATION DU FRANCAIS: DE LA DESCRIPTION LINGUISTIQUE A LA RECONNAISSANCE AUTOMATIQUE, Doctorat, Univ. de Louvain.
Oiler, D.K., & Smith, B.L., (1977), “Effect of final-syllable position on vowel duration in infant babbling”, J. Ac. Soc. Am. 62, 944–997.
Pike, K.L., (1945), THE INTONATION OF AMERICAN ENGLISH, Ann Arbor, Publications in Linguistics, 1, Univ. of Michigan Press.
Roudet, L., (1910), ELEMENTS DE PHONETIQUE GENERALE, H. Welter, Paris.
Rousselot, l’abbé, (1924), PRINCIPES DE PHONETIQUE EXPERIMENTALE, Paris, Didier.
Scott, D.R., Isard, S.D., & de Boysson-Bardies, B., (1985), “Perceptual isochrony in English and in French”, J. Phon., 13,155–162.
Séguinot, A., 1976), “L’accent d’insistance en français standard”, Studia Phonetica, Didier, 12, 1–58.
Touati, P., (1987), STRUCTURES PROSODIQUES DU SUEDOIS ET DU FRANCAIS, PROFILS TEMPORELS ET CONFIGURATIONS TONALES, Tray. Inst. Ling. Lund.
Vaissière, J., (1971), CONTRIBUTION A LA SYNTHESE PAR REGLES DU FRANCAIS, Thèse de Troisième Cycle, Univ. des Sciences et Lettres, Grenoble 1971.
Vaissière, J., (1974), “On French Prosody”, Quarterly Progress Report, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Res. Lab. of Electr., No 114, 1974, 212–223.
Vaissière, J., (1975), “Further Note on French Prosody”, Quaterly Progress Report, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Res. Lab. of Electr., No. 115, Jan 1975, 251–261.
Vaissière, J., (1983), “Language-independent prosodic features”, in PROSODY: MODELS AND MEASUREMENTS, A. Cutler, A. & R. Ladd, (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 53–66.
Vaissière, J., (1989), CONTRIBUTION A L’ANALYSE DES PHENOMENES DE PAROLE CONTINUELUE, Doctorat d’Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université des Sciences Humaines de Strasbourg.
Wenk, BJ. & Wioland, F., (1982), “Is French really syllable-timed?”, J. Phon., 10,193–216.
Woodrow, H., (1951), “Time perception”, Handbook of experimental Psychology, S.S. Stevens (ed.), New-York: Wiley, 1224–1236.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 The Wenner-Gren Center
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vaissière, J. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In: Sundberg, J., Nord, L., Carlson, R. (eds) Music, Language, Speech and Brain. Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12670-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)