Skip to main content

Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French

  • Chapter
Music, Language, Speech and Brain

Abstract

Following tradition and for the sake of convenience in contrasting French with other languages, much of the research and theory have assumed that French has a stress located on the last full syllable of every lexical word, an “accent de mot intrinsèque” (Rousselot, 1924). Lexical words are opposed to function words, such as articles and auxiliaries, which do not have a potentially stressable final syllable (Garde, 1968). In continuous speech, the “accent de mot” or word accent of a number of lexical words is often not fully realized, or not realized at all, due to modifications dictated by the larger patterns of the speech measure or phrase (a phenomenon not particular to French, Heffner, 1950:228). Only the last syllable of the last word in a group of words, lengthened and often superimposed with a fundamental frequency (Fo) rise or a Fo peak as the expression of continuation, is regularly perceived as prominent, giving rise to the so-called “accent de groupe” (Delattre, 1966:75). There is no clear cut definition of this “groupe”. A group generally constitutes a unit of meaning, a sense-group. The same sentence can be chunked into more or less units of meaning, depending on the rate of speaking and on the speaker (Grammont, 1914; Coustenoble and Armstrong, 1934; Delattre, 1966:65; Vaissière, 1974:216; Vaissière, 1989; see also Hirst & Di Cristo, 1984). Prominence can be perceived also at the beginning of the word, as a consequence of emphasis (Grammont, 1914), of the “accent intellectuel” (Marouzeau, 1934; Roudet, 1910), as a regular characteristic of professional announcers (Leon, 1971; Fonagy & Fonagy, 1976), and in certain dialects (Fouché, 1936; Carton, 1976).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abercrombie, D., (1967), ELEMENTS OF GENERAL PHONETICS, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G., & Hakwins, S., (1978), “The development of phonological rhythm”, in SYLLABLES AND SEGMENTS, A. Bell, J. Hopper, (eds), Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing C, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G.D., (1975), “Speech rhythm: its relation to performance universals and articulatory timing”, J. Phon., 3, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, L.E. & Ward, I.C., (1926), A HANDBOOK OF ENGLISH INTONATION, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bally, C., (1926), “Le rythme linguistique et sa signification sociale”, ler Congrès du Rythme, Genève, 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton„ T.L., (1894), “Rhythm”, Amer. J. Psychol., 6, 145–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, S. & Cutler, A, (1988), “Segmentation errors by human listeners: evidence for a prosodic segmentation strategy”, Proceedings. of Speech’ 88., Edinburgh, Vol. 3, 827–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton, F., (1967), “Pente et rupture mélodique en français régional du Nord”, VI Int. Cong. Phon. Sc., 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton, F., (1976), “Insistance dialectale”, Studio Phonetica, 12, 60–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coustenoble, H.N., & Armstrong, L.E., (1934), STUDIES IN FRENCH INTONATION, W. Heffner and Sons Ltd, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S., (1989), “Natural speech cues to word segmentation under difficult listening conditions”, Eurospeech 89, European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Paris, Vol. 2, 372–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, R.M., (1983), “Stress-timing and syllabe-timing reanalyzed?”, J. Phon., 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delattre, P., (1965), COMPARING THE PHONETIC FEATURES OF ENGLISH, GERMAN, SPANISH AND FRENCH, Julius Gross Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delattre, P., (1966), STUDIES IN FRENCH AND COMPARATIVE PHONETICS, Selected papers in French and in English, Mouton, London, The Hague, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demany, L., MCKenzie, B., & Vurpillot, E. (1977), “Rhythm perception in early infancy”,Nature, 266, 5066, 7, 118–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A., & Hirst, D., (1986), “French micromelody: analysis and synthesis”, Phonetica, 43, 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duez, D, & Nishinuma, Y., (1984), “Some evidence of rhythmic patterns of spoken French”, PERILUS, 1984–5, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duez, D., (1978), ESSAI SUR LA PROSODIE DU DISCOURS POLITIQUE, Thèse de 3ième Cycle, Univ. de Paris I II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duez, D., (1987), CONTRIBUTION A L’ETUDE DE LA STRUCTURATION TEMPORELLE DE LA PAROLE EN FRANCAIS, Thèse d’Etat, Université de Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., & Nord, L., (1990), “Segmental durations within a prosodic frame in Swedish, French and English”, PHONUM I, Reports from the Department de Phonetics, University of Umeä, Sweden, 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., Nord, L., (forthcoming), “Duration correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English”, in Proceedings of the Second Seminar on Speech Production, Leeds, May 1990, To appear in J. Phon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.J., & Bever, T., (1965), “The psychological reality of linguistics segments”, J. Verb. Learn. Behavior., 4, 414–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, I, & Fonagy, J., (1976), “Prosodie professionnelle et changements prosodiques”, Le français moderne, 44, 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, I., (1980a), “L’accent français: accent probalitaire (dynamique d’un changement prosodique”, in L’ACCENT EN FRANCAIS CONTEMPORAIN, Studio Phonetica 15, Fonagy, I. & Léon, P. (Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouché, P., (1936), “Les diverses sortes de français Au point de vue phonétique”, Le Français Moderne, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P., (1956), LES STRUCTURES RHYTMIQUES, Louvain, Publications Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P., (1974), PSYCHOLOGIE DU RYTHME, Collection SUP, Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammont, G., (1914), TRAITE PRATIQUE DE PRONONCIATION FRANCAISE, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, F., Grosjean, L., & Lane, H., (1979), “The patterns of silences: performance structures in sentence production”, Cognitive Psychology, 11, 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner, R-M., S., (1950), GENERAL PHONETICS, The Univ. of Wincons in Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A., (1984), “French intonation: a parametric approach”, Die Neueren Sprachen, 83,5,554–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., (1909), AN OUTLINE OF ENGLISH PHONETICS, W. Heffner and Sons Ltd, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D.H., (1976), “Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence”, J. Ac. Soc. Am., 1208–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konopcynski, G., (1988), “Les oppositions intonatives chez l’enfant préverbal”, in Toronto Working Papers of Speech and Voice Society, Vol. 8, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D.E., (1960), “Perception of sequence in auditory events”, J. Exp. Psychology, 13, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, W.A., (1974), PROSODIC AIDS TO SPEECH RECOGNITION: A SUMMARY OF RESULTS TO DATE, Sperry Univac Technical Report, No. PX 11087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, I., (1977), “Isochrony reconsidered”, J. Phon ., 5, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, I., Olive, J.P., & Streeter, L.A., (1976), “Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences”, J. Ac. Soc. Am., 60, 1199–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léon, P., (1971), “La joncture ex terne en français: nature et fonctions linguistiques et expressives”, Essai de Phonostylistique, Studia Phonetica, 4, Didier, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M. & Prince, A., (1977), “On stress and linguistic rhythm”, Ling. Ing., Vol. 8, Number 2, 249–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Ph., (1967), INTONATION, PERCEPTION AND LANGUAGE, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marouzeau, J., (1934), “Accent d’insistance affectif et intellectuel”, Le Français Moderne, 2, 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P., (1987), L’INTONATION DU FRANCAIS: DE LA DESCRIPTION LINGUISTIQUE A LA RECONNAISSANCE AUTOMATIQUE, Doctorat, Univ. de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oiler, D.K., & Smith, B.L., (1977), “Effect of final-syllable position on vowel duration in infant babbling”, J. Ac. Soc. Am. 62, 944–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K.L., (1945), THE INTONATION OF AMERICAN ENGLISH, Ann Arbor, Publications in Linguistics, 1, Univ. of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roudet, L., (1910), ELEMENTS DE PHONETIQUE GENERALE, H. Welter, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousselot, l’abbé, (1924), PRINCIPES DE PHONETIQUE EXPERIMENTALE, Paris, Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D.R., Isard, S.D., & de Boysson-Bardies, B., (1985), “Perceptual isochrony in English and in French”, J. Phon., 13,155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Séguinot, A., 1976), “L’accent d’insistance en français standard”, Studia Phonetica, Didier, 12, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touati, P., (1987), STRUCTURES PROSODIQUES DU SUEDOIS ET DU FRANCAIS, PROFILS TEMPORELS ET CONFIGURATIONS TONALES, Tray. Inst. Ling. Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J., (1971), CONTRIBUTION A LA SYNTHESE PAR REGLES DU FRANCAIS, Thèse de Troisième Cycle, Univ. des Sciences et Lettres, Grenoble 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J., (1974), “On French Prosody”, Quarterly Progress Report, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Res. Lab. of Electr., No 114, 1974, 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J., (1975), “Further Note on French Prosody”, Quaterly Progress Report, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Res. Lab. of Electr., No. 115, Jan 1975, 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J., (1983), “Language-independent prosodic features”, in PROSODY: MODELS AND MEASUREMENTS, A. Cutler, A. & R. Ladd, (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J., (1989), CONTRIBUTION A L’ANALYSE DES PHENOMENES DE PAROLE CONTINUELUE, Doctorat d’Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université des Sciences Humaines de Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenk, BJ. & Wioland, F., (1982), “Is French really syllable-timed?”, J. Phon., 10,193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H., (1951), “Time perception”, Handbook of experimental Psychology, S.S. Stevens (ed.), New-York: Wiley, 1224–1236.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1991 The Wenner-Gren Center

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vaissière, J. (1991). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In: Sundberg, J., Nord, L., Carlson, R. (eds) Music, Language, Speech and Brain. Wenner-Gren Center International Symposium Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-12672-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-12670-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics