Skip to main content

Introduction: Popular Fiction: Ideology or Utopia?

  • Chapter
Popular Fiction and Social Change

Abstract

Although there has been a growth of interest in popular fiction over the last few years, one could not claim that it has been established in schools or colleges as a central component of literary studies. The English lecturer who proposes a course in this area may well be told that it would be difficult to find space on the timetable for such a ‘minor’ field of study, although the same objections do not seem to apply when one of his/her colleagues suggests yet another option in seventeenth-century poetry. A course dealing with popular genres such as science fiction or thrillers is, apparently, a luxury which the department cannot afford. ‘It would be nice if we had the time, of course, but …’ Such entrenched resistance is not wholly surprising. Most intellectual disciplines harbour conservative as well as innovative tendencies. Once a field of study has been established within an academic institution it will attract a community of teachers and scholars who have a vested interest in its continuity and growth. Adherents to the discipline tend to work within its intellectual paradigms, taking them as given rather than exploring the boundaries of their subject in a critical manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Quoted in P. Parrinder, Science Fiction: Its Criticism and Teaching ( London: Methuen, 1980 ), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Suvin, Metamorphoses of Science Fiction ( New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979 ), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, the recent collection of essays entitled Popular Television and Film, edited by T. Bennett et al. ( London: BFI, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See R. Escarpit, The Book Revolution ( London: Harrap, 1976 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Berelson and P. J. Salter, ‘Majority and Minority Americans: An Analysis of Magazine Fiction’, Public Opinion Quarterly, X (1946), 168–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Jameson, ‘Magical Narrative: Romance as Genre’, New Literary History, No. 7 (1975) 135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Propp, The Morphology of the Folk-Tale (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics, 1958 );

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Todorov, Introduction à la Littérature Fantastique ( Paris: Seuil, 1970 );

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Eco, The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a theory which attempts to combine the ‘archetypal’ and the culturally specific, see J. G. Cawelti, Adventure, Mystery, and Romance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, trans. C. Jacobson and B. G. Schoepf ( New York: Basic, 1963 ), pp. 206–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Jameson, ‘Ideology, Narrative Analysis, and Popular Culture’, Theory and Society, No. 4 (1977), 543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, trans. G. Wall ( London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978 ), pp. 159–248.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act ( London: Methuen, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See for example L. Goldmann, Towards a Sociology of the Novel, trans. A. Sheridan ( London: Tavistock, 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Bennett, ‘Marxism and Popular Fiction’, Literature and History, VII, No. 2 (Autumn, 1981 ) 151.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Lowenthal, Literature, Popular Culture and Society (Palo Alto, California: Pacific Books, 1961), p. xii.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Adorno, ‘Television and the Patterns of Mass Culture’ in B. Rosenberg and D. Manning-White (eds), Mass Culture ( Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1957 ) pp. 483–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See A. Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971), especially pp. 322–4 and 419–25. There is an important discussion of ‘common sense’ and its application to the analysis of popular fiction in Roger Bromley’s article ‘Natural Boundaries: the Social Function of Popular Fiction’, in Red Letters, No. 7, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1984 Rosalind Brunt, Bridget Fowler, David Glover, Jerry Palmer, Martin Jordin, Stuart Laing, Adrian Mellor, Christopher Pawling

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pawling, C. (1984). Introduction: Popular Fiction: Ideology or Utopia?. In: Pawling, C. (eds) Popular Fiction and Social Change. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15856-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics