Abstract
The analysis considered in Part II focused upon the functioning and transformation of advanced capitalism. Each theory sought to provide an explanation of the ‘long boom’, understand the contradictions which would ultimately undermine it, and thereby account for the passivity of the working classes in the West, as well as locating the basis for any future radicalisation. In all cases the economic structures of backward areas and their relationship to those of developed countries figured hardly at all. Only Baran and Sweezy thought them to be significant, and even in Monopoly Capital they were of secondary importance. The forces of stability and change in the heartlands of capitalism were seen to operate primarily through the reproduction and growth of the major capitalist economies.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Faaland, Population and the World Economy in the 21st Century (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982), p. 162.
M.C. Howard and J.E. King, The Political Economy of Marx (Harlow: Longman, 1985), 2nd edn, Ch. 14;
A. Brewer, Marxist Theories of Imperialism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980); see also volume I of this book.
P.A. Baran, ‘Discussion’, American Economic Review 41, 1951, pp. 355–8;
Baran, ‘National Economic Planning’, in B.F. Haley (ed.), A Survey of Contemporary Economics (Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1952), pp. 355–403;
Baran, ‘On the Political Economy of Backwardness’, Manchester School, 20, 1952, pp. 66–84;
Baran, The Political Economy of Growth (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973; first published in 1957);
Baran, The Longer View (New York: Monthly Review Press. 1970).
F. Claudin, The Communist Movement: From Comintern to Cominform (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975);
B. Warren, Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1980);
M.N. Roy, Selected Works: Volume I, 1917–23 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987);
Roy, M.N. Roy’s Memoirs (Bombay: Allied Publishers, 1964);
O. Kuusinen, Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1928);
A. Foster-Carter, ‘Neo-Marxist Approaches to Development and Underdevelopment’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 3, 1973, pp. 7–33;
A. Pronin, India (Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1940);
M. Blomström & B. Hettne, Development Theory in Transition (London: Zed, 1984);
L.D. Trotsky, Writings of Leon Trotsky (New York: Pathfinder Press, 1975–1981): (1930), pp. 242–6, 324; (1933–4), p. 306; (1937–8), pp. 324, 358–61, 430; (1938–9), pp. 26, 33–5. 326–9; see also section II of Ch. 2 above.
J.E. King, Economic Exiles (London: Macmillan, 1988), Ch. 8.
L.E. Di Marco (ed.), International Economics and Development: Essays in Honor of Raul Prebisch (New York: Academic Press, 1972);
I.M.D. Little, Economic Development (New York: Basic Books, 1982).
M.H. Dobb, Economic Growth and Underdeveloped Countries (London: Laurence & Wishart, 1963);
E.K. Valkenier, ‘East-West Economic Competition in the Third World’, in M.D. Shulman (ed.), East-West Tensions in the Third World (New York: Norton, 1986), Ch. 6.
J. Robinson, review of The Political Economy of Growth, Nation, 184, 1957, pp. 485–6;
N. Kaldor, review of The Political Economy of Growth, American Economic Review, 48, 1958, pp. 164–70.
K. Griffin and J. Gurley, ‘Radical Analysis of Imperialism, the Third World, and the Transition to Socialism’, Journal of Economic Literature, XXIII, 1985, pp. 1089–143.
Baran himself made little of this final point, but it is stressed by some of his disciples: see, for example, H. Magdoff, The Age of Imperialism: The Economics of U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969), pp. 43–54.
R. Nurkse, Patterns of Trade and Development (Oxford: Blackwell, 1961).
N. Chomsky, On Power and Ideology (Montreal: Black Rose, 1987);
E. Kolko, Confronting the Third World (New York: Pantheon, 1988);
S.E. Ambrose, Rise to Globalism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989), 5th edn;
F. Halliday, Cold War, Third World: An Essay on Soviet-American Relations (London: Hutchinson, 1989).
M.C. Howard, ‘Fernand Braudel on Capitalism: A Theoretical Analysis’, Historical Reflections, 12, 1985, pp. 469–83.
Compare A. Emmanuel, Appropriate or Underdeveloped Technology? (Chichester: Wiley, 1982),
and E.F. Schumacher, Small is Beautiful (London: Blond & Briggs, 1973).
P. Armstrong, A. Glyn and J. Harrison, Capitalism Since World War II (London: Fontana, 1984), pp. 106–12, 125–6, 154–5, 161–2;
M.J. Hogan, The Marshall Plan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).
T. Morris-Suzuki, A History of Japanese Economic Thought (London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 108–11.
T. Dos Santos, ‘The Structure of Dependence’, American Economic Review, 60, 1970, pp. 231–36;
T.H. Weaver and M. Berger, ‘The Marxist Critique of Dependency Theory: An Introduction’, in C. Wilber (ed.), The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment (New York: Random House, 1984), 3rd edn, pp. 45–64; Blomström & Hettne. Development Theory.
S. Lall, ‘Is “Dependence” a Useful Concept in Analysing Underdevelopment?’ World Development 3, 1975, pp. 799–810; Little, Economic Development, Part IV; The Economist, 4 November 1989, pp. 123.
P. Clecak, Radical Paradoxes: Dilemmas of the American Left, 1945–70 (New York: Harper & Row, 1973), Chs 1, 2 and 4.
I. Deutscher, The Prophet Armed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954), pp. 291, 513;
Deutscher, The Prophet Unarmed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959), pp. viif, 199–200, 262, 464ff;
Deutscher, The Prophet Outcast (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963), pp. 92ff, 102ff, 308ff, 510ff, 521;
Deutscher, Stalin (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966), pp. 14, 244, 553, 557ff, 609–13;
Deutscher, The Great Contest (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960), pp. 20–1;
Deutscher, Ironies of History (New York: Simon & Schuster; 1966), pp. 17, 23, 25, 30–1;
Deutscher, The Unfinished Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 38, 53–8, 104–7;
Deutscher, Russia After Stalin (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1969), pp. 55, 64, 96, 101, 165–75;
M. Croan, ‘Prospects for the Soviet Dictatorship: Otto Bauer’, in L. Labedz (ed.), Revisionism (London: Allen & Unwin, 1962), pp. 281–96;
L.H. Haimson (ed.), The Mensheviks: From the Revolution of 1917 to the Second World War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).
Mao Tse-Tung, A Critique of Soviet Economics (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977); Editorial Department of Renmin Ribao, ‘Chairman Mao’s Theory of the Differentiation of the Three Worlds is a Major Contribution to Marxism-Leninism’, Peking Review 45, 1977, pp. 10–41.
M. Ellman, Socialist Planning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 272–6, 278, 288, 294.
See the articles by Bettelheim in P. Sweezy and C. Bettelheim, On The Transition to Socialism (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971),
and also C. Bettelheim, Class Struggles in the USSR (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976 and 1978), volumes I and II.
Clecak, Radical Paradoxes; D. Caute, The Fellow Travellers: Intellectual Friends of Communism (New Haven, Coun.: Yale University Press, 1988) Part III.
S. Schram, The Thought of Mao Tse-Tung (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);
R. Debray, Che’s Guerilla War (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975);
H. Ramm, The Marxism of R. Debray (Lawrence: Regent’s Press of Kansas, 1978)
A.G. Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971; first published in 1967).
A.G. Frank, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution? (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969).
Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment, pp. 32, 91–2, 99, 122–7, 134, 142, 218, 225, 238, 327. However, as with all of Frank’s exposition, virtually nothing is stated unambiguously. See A. Nove, ‘On Reading André Gunder Frank’, Journal of Development Studies, 10, 1973, pp. 445–55.
Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment, pp. 145, 228; A.G. Frank, Lumpenbourgeoisie: Lumpendevelopment (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972); Blomström and Hettne, Development Theory, 58ff, 67ff, 175ff; Clecak, Radical Paradoxes.
A.G. Frank, World Accumulation 1492–1789 (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1978);
Frank, Dependent Accumulation and Underdevelopment (London: Macmillan, 1979);
Frank, Crisis: In the World Economy (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1980);
Frank, Crisis: In the Third World (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1981).
I. Wallerstein, The Modern World-System I (New York: Academic Press, 1974), pp. 87ff, 126ff;
Wallerstein, The Capitalist World-Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press, 1979), pp. 4–5, 15, 17, 19, 66, 68, 120, 122–4, 147, 155–9, 196–7, 206ff, 276–8, 285;
Wallerstein, The Politics of the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 16;
Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism (London: Verso, 1983).
Wallerstein, Modern I, pp. 127–8, 179, 356; Wallerstein, The Modern World System II (New York: Academic Press, 1980), pp. 28, 31, 249; Wallerstein, Capitalist, pp. 61, 71, 73, 87, 129, 134, 142; Wallerstein, Politics, pp. 9, 80, 97–8, 111, 155, 165: Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism, pp. 40. 47, 72, 97ff, 100–4.
Wallerstein, Modern I, pp. 38, 349–50, 37; Wallerstein, Modern II, pp. 7–9, 38, 48, 55; Wallerstein, The Modern World System III (New York: Academic Press, 1989); Wallerstein, Capitalist, pp. 87, 97, 120–1, 129, 134, 285, 292–3; Wallerstein, Politics, pp. 16ff, 38–9, 59, 125ff, 155ff.
Many of these articles are reprinted in Wallerstein, Capitalist and Wallerstein, Politics. See also G. Arrighi, T.K. Hopkins and I. Wallerstein, Antisystemic Movements (London: Verso 1989).
I. Wallerstein, ‘Marx and Underdevelopment’, in S. Resnick and R. Wolff (eds), Rethinking Marxism (New York: Autonomedia, 1985), pp. 379–95; Wallerstein, Capitalist, pp. 9, 22–3, 53, 57, 68, 147, 154–5, 181, 191; Wallerstein, Politics p. 35; Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism, pp. 8–9.
‘Super-imperialism’ denotes the dominance of one imperialist power over all the others. It should be distinguished both from (classical) notions of imperialist rivalry and from Kautsky’s concept of ‘ultra-imperialism’, which refers to stable collusion between imperialist powers. See R. Rowthorn, Capitalism, Conflict and Inflation (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1980), pp. 48–78.
Wallerstein, Capitalist, pp. 30ff, 58, 61, 66, 68, 82, 239–40, 272, 280; Wallerstein, Politics, 52ff, 83–4, 88ff, 92ff, 106–9, 112ff, 125ff, 172; Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism, pp. 69, 86ff, 91–2, 108–11; C. Chase-Dunn (ed.), Socialist States in the World System (Beverley Hills, Cal.: Sage, 1982);
see also P. Mattick, Anti-Bolshevik Communism (London: Merlin. 1978).
Wallerstein, Capitalist, pp. 196, 200, 224. 230, 284, 288; Wallerstein, Historical Capitalism, pp. 89ff; Arrighi, Hopkins and Wallerstein, Antisystemic Movements; cf. F. Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Press, 1968) and
H. Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 M. C. Howard and J. E. King
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howard, M.C., King, J.E. (1992). Capitalism and Underdevelopment. In: A History of Marxian Economics. Radical Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21890-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21890-5_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-38814-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-21890-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)