Skip to main content

Ethics, Advocacy and Empowerment in Researching Language

  • Chapter
Sociolinguistics

Part of the book series: Modern Linguistics Series ((MAML))

Abstract

Researching Language, the book-length study on which the following discussion is based, deals with questions about power and method in a range of social science disciplines (anthropology, sociology and sociolinguistics). To put ‘power’ and ‘method’ together in such an explicit way, and to foreground them as major concerns, is perhaps an unconventional move. Yet any social researcher who has undertaken fieldwork must at some level be aware that power relations exist in this context as in others; and those power relations are strongly affected by the methods we are constrained to adopt in ‘doing research’. That is, they are not entirely determined by preexisting differences of status imported from other contexts. Something happens within the process of research itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, Gordon, C. (ed.) (Brighton: Harvester Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972) ‘Rules for Ritual Insults’, in Language in the Inner City ( Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1982) ‘Objectivity and Commitment in Linguistic Science: The Case of the Black English Trial in Ann Arbor’, Language in Society, 44, 165–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlhäusler, P. (1990) ‘Reducing’ Pacific Languages to Writing’, in Joseph, J. E. and Taylor, T. J. (eds) Ideologies of Language ( London: Routledge ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981) ‘Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’, in Roberts, H. (ed.) Doing Feminist Research ( London: Routledge ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G. and Hacker, P. (1984) Language, Sense and Nonsense ( Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and Luckman, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality ( Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Botha, R. (1981) The Conduct of Linguistic Inquiry ( The Hague: Mouton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P. (1990) Linguistic Realities: An Autonomist Metatheory for the Generative Enterprise ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. K. (1995) Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance ( Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and Representations ( New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, T. (1987) Language in Mind and Language in Society: Studies in Linguistic Reproduction ( Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romaine, S. (1982) Socio-historical Linguistics ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. and Howard, G. (eds) (1979) Social Markers in Speech ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Nikolas Coupland Adam Jaworski

Copyright information

© 1997 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., Richardson, K. (1997). Ethics, Advocacy and Empowerment in Researching Language. In: Coupland, N., Jaworski, A. (eds) Sociolinguistics. Modern Linguistics Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-61180-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25582-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics