Skip to main content

Multiple-Cue Probability Learning

  • Reference work entry

Synonyms

Function learning; Lens model; Probabilistic categorization; Weather prediction task

Definition

Multiple-Cue Probability Learning (MCPL) is an experimental paradigm concerned with how well people can learn imperfect relationships between cues and outcomes. In a typical MCPL task, participants are shown an array of cues each of which predicts a particular outcome with some probability; usually this probability is less than unity, mirroring the imperfect nature of cues in the natural environment. The cues are usually instantiated as simple perceptual stimuli, which can be either discretely (often binary) valued, such as color – a given cue might be a red or green, for instance – or stimuli can be comprised of continuously valued dimensions – such as bars of different lengths. The former case with discrete cues is typically referred to as nonmetric multiple-cue probability learning (NMCPL), and the latter case with continuous cues is termed metricmultiple-cue probability...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   3,400.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The Adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A., Shohamy, D., & Myers, C. (2002). How do people solve the “weather prediction” task?: Individual variability in strategies for probabilistic category learning. Learning & Memory, 9, 408–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996). A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science, 273, 1399–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruschke, J. K., & Johansen, M. K. (1999). A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1083–1119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Little .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Little, D.R., Lewandowsky, S. (2012). Multiple-Cue Probability Learning. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_625

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_625

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics