Abstract
The field of biofilm microbiology, while by no means new, has been experiencing significant “growing pains” as more and more researchers become involved. One of the underlying reasons is the lack of standardized methods for culturing biofilm communities. Many times, the culturing format will be unique to the study in question, resulting in difficulties when other labs attempt to confirm results produced by another lab. Another issue has been the limited utility of different culturing methods for the specific research questions being asked. For example, culturing formats designed to be accessible to microscopy are not always suited for other types of analyses, such as harvesting biofilm biomass for biochemical measurements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banin E, Lozinski A, Brady KM et al (2008) The potential of desferrioxamine-gallium as an anti-Pseudomonas therapeutic agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16761–16766
Boles BR, Thoendel M, Singh PK (2005) Rhamnolipids mediate detachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from biofilms. Mol Microbiol 57:1210–1223
Boles BR, Thoendel M, Singh PK (2004) Self-generated diversity produces “insurance effects” in biofilm communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16630–16635
Borriello G, Werner E, Roe F et al (2004) Oxygen limitation contributes to antibiotic tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2659–2664
Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C et al (1999) The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol 37:1771–1776
Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ et al (1985) Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996–1006
Cucarella C, Tormo MA, Knecht E et al (2002) Expression of the biofilm-associated protein interferes with host protein receptors of Staphylococcus aureus and alters the infective process. Infect Immun 70:3180–3186
Garo E, Eldridge GR, Goering, MG et al (2007) Asiatic acid and corosolic acid enhance the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:1813–1817
Hamon MA, Lazazzera BA (2001) The sporulation transcription factor Spo0A is required for biofilm development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 42:1199–1209
Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Turner RJ (2007a) Multimetal resistance and tolerance in microbial biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:928–938
Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Ceri H (2007b) A subpopulation of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis biofilm cells are highly tolerant to chelating agents. FEMS Microbiol Lett 272:172–181
Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Ceri H (2005a) Persister cells, the biofilm matrix and tolerance to metal cations in biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol 7:981–994
Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Ceri H (2005b) High-throughput metal susceptibility testing of microbial biofilms. BMC Microbiol 5:53
Harrison JJ, Wade WD, Akierman S et al (2009) The chromosomal toxin yafQ is a determinant of multidrug tolerance for Escherichia coli growing in a biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00043-09
Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Yerly J et al (2006) The use of microscopy and three-dimensional visualization to evaluate the structure of microbial biofilms cultivated in the Calgary Biofilm Device. Biol Proced Online 8:194–215
Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Joo DA et al (2008) Copper and quaternary ammonium cations exert synergistic bactericidal and antibiofilm activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2870–2881
Hentzer M, Teitzel GM, Balzer GJ et al (2001) Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J Bacteriol 183:5395–5401
Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M et al (2000) Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146(Pt 10):2395–2407
Kirisits MJ, Parsek MR (2006) Does Pseudomonas aeruginosa use intercellular signalling to build biofilm communities? Cell Microbiol 8:1841–1849
Kirisits MJ, Prost L, Starkey M et al (2005) Characterization of colony morphology variants isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4809–4821
Knobloch JK, Bartscht K, Sabottke A et al (2001) Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis depends on functional RsbU, an activator of the sigB operon: differential activation mechanisms due to ethanol and salt stress. J Bacteriol 183:2624–2633
Landry RM, An D, Hupp JT et al (2006) Mucin-Pseudomonas aeruginosa interactions promote biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance. Mol Microbiol 59:142–151
Lee J, Bansal T, Jayaraman A et al (2007) Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli biofilms are inhibited by 7-hydroxyindole and stimulated by isatin. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4100–4109
Moreau-Marquis S, Bomberger JM, Anderson GG et al (2008) The DeltaF508-CFTR mutation results in increased biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa by increasing iron availability. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 295:L25–37
Morley D (1945) A simple method for testing the sensitivity of wound bacteria to penicillin and sulphathiazole by use of impregnated blotting paper discs. J Pathol Bacteriol 57:379–382
Musk DJ, Banko DA, Hergenrother PJ (2005) Iron salts perturb biofilm formation and disrupt existing biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chem Biol 12:789–796
O’Toole GA, Kolter R (1998a) Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol 28:449–461
O’Toole GA, Kolter R (1998b) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30:295–304
Palmer RJ (1999) Microscopy flowcells: perfusion chambers for real-time study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol 310:160–166
Parkins MD, Ceri H, Storey DG (2001) Pseudomonas aeruginosa GacA, a factor in multihost virulence, is also essential for biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol 40:1215–1226
Pierce CG, Uppuluri P, Tristan AR et al (2008) A simple and reproducible 96-well plate-based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility testing. Nat Protoc 3:1494–1500
Pitts B, Willse A, McFeters GA et al (2001) A repeatable laboratory method for testing the efficacy of biocides against toilet bowl biofilms. J Appl Microbiol 91:110–117
Ramey BE, Parsek MR (2005) Growing and analyzing biofilms in fermenters. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 1: Unit 1B.3
Rani SA, Pitts B, Beyenal H et al (2007) Spatial patterns of DNA replication, protein synthesis, and oxygen concentration within bacterial biofilms reveal diverse physiological states. J Bacteriol 189:4223–4233
Rickard AH, McBain AJ, Stead AT et al (2004) Shear rate moderates community diversity in freshwater biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7426–7435
Schaefer AL, Greenberg EP, Parsek MR (2001) Acylated homoserine lactone detection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by radiolabel assay. In: Doyle RJ (ed) Methods in enzymology. Academic, London, pp 41–47
Sokurenko EV, Vogel V, Thomas WE (2008) Catch-bond mechanism of force-enhanced adhesion: counterintuitive, elusive, but ... widespread? Cell Host Microbe 4:314–323
Spoering AL, Lewis K (2001) Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J Bacteriol 183:6746–6751
Stewart PS, Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:199–210
Stewart PS, Rani SA, Gjersing E et al (2007) Observations of cell cluster hollowing in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Lett Appl Microbiol 44:454–457
Tu Quoc PH, Genevaux P, Pajunen M et al (2007) Isolation and characterization of biofilm formation-defective mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 75:1079–1088
Valle J, Toledo-Arana A, Berasain C et al (2003) SarA and not sigmaB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 48:1075–1087
Watnick PI, Kolter R (1999) Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae El Tor biofilm. Mol Microbiol 34:586–595
Willcock, L, Gilbert P, Holah J et al (2000) A new technique for the performance evaluation of clean-in-place disinfection of biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 25:235–241
Werner E, Roe F, Bugnicourt A et al (2004) Stratified growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6188–6196
Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ. Volper EM et al (2004) Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol 186:1838–1850
Zelver N, Hamilton M, Goeres D et al (2001) Development of a standardized antibiofilm test. Methods Enzymol 337:363–376
Zelver N, Hamilton M, Pitts B et al (1999) Measuring antimicrobial effects on biofilm bacteria: from laboratory to field. Methods Enzymol 310:608–628
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peterson, S.B. et al. (2011). Different Methods for Culturing Biofilms In Vitro. In: Bjarnsholt, T., Jensen, P., Moser, C., Høiby, N. (eds) Biofilm Infections. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6084-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6084-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6083-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6084-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)