Abstract
As this is being written, the Governor General of Australia, Dr. Peter Hollingworth, has not resigned. Yet over the previous weeks and months he must have been thinking about it long and hard. He has been under intense pressure from various quarters, based on allegations that in previous positions of leadership he had not handled some sexual abuse incidents appropriately. In pondering what he should do, he must have been considering the many and varied arguments on both sides of the case. He must, in short, have been deliberating about his future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bar-Hillel Y., & others. (1969). Formal logic and natural languages: A symposium. Foundations of Language, 3,256–284.
Dyson F. J. (2002, March 28). Science and religion: No ends in sight. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved on August 28, 2002 from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/15220
Kuhn D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things:: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Minto, B. (1995). The pyramid principle: Logic in writing and thinking. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education.
Monk, P. (2001, March 16). Mapping the future of argument. Australian Financial Review, (pp. 8-9).
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twentyyears of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rolf, B., & Magnusson, C. (2002). Developing the art of argumentation. A software approach. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Argumentation, University of Amsterdam.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Gelder, T. J. (2001). How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads: proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Australasian Society for computers in learning in tertiary education (pp. 539-548). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Uni, The University of Melbourne.
Van Gelder, T. J., & Bulka, A. (2000). Reason!Able (Version 1.1). Melbourne: The Reason Group. Available from http://www.goreason.com
Webster N., & Porter N. (1913). Ilebster’s revised unabridged dictionary of the English language. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Gelder, T. (2003). Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer Supported Argument Visualization. In: Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Carr, C.S. (eds) Visualizing Argumentation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0037-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0037-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-664-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0037-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive