Skip to main content

Development, Applied, and Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Perspective

Abstract

Contemporary anatomical insights beginning in the 1970s have driven the dramatic improvements in outcomes for men treated by surgical removal of the prostate. Before the 1980s, only the very hardy patient was able to tolerate the morbidity of attempted surgical cure of prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Walsh PC. The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1632–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128(3):492–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Quinlan DM, Epstein JI, Carter BS, Walsh PC. Sexual function ­following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol. 1991;145(5):998–1002.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitmore Jr WF. Natural history of low-stage prostatic cancer and the impact of early detection. Urol Clin North Am. 1990;17(4):689–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Montie JE, Smith JA. Whitmoreisms: memorable quotes from Willet F. Whitmore, Jr, M.D. Urology. 2004;63(1):207–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Menon M. Robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2003;91(3):175–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int. 2004;94(7):1071–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim ED, Nath R, Slawin KM, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Scardino PT. Bilateral nerve grafting during radical retropubic prostatectomy: extended follow-up. Urology. 2001;58(6):983–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Costello AJ, Dowdle B, Namdarian B, Pedersen J, Murphy DG. Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region. BJU Int. 2011;107:1210–5. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen ME, Schaeffer EM, Marschke P, Walsh PC. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2557–64; discussion 64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2291–6; discussion 2296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tewari AK, Rao SR. Anatomical foundations and surgical manoeuvres for precise identification of the prostatovesical junction during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006;98(4):833–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takenaka A, Tewari A, Hara R, Leung RA, Kurokawa K, Murakami G, et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J Urol. 2007;177(1):225–9; discussion 9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, Horninger W, Peschel R, Bartsch G, et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006;98(2):314–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weis P, Hiscoe H. Experiments on the mechanism of nerve growth. J Exp Zool. 1948;107:315–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor A. Experimental analysis of the effectiveness of retrograde nerve tracers in vitro and in vivo in male wistar rats for the potential use in human nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy [advanced medical science]. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finley DS, Osann K, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Hypothermic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: rationale, feasibility, and effect on early continence. Urology. 2009;73(4):691–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koraitim MM. The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: an anatomical concept and its physiological correlate. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):179–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, Gadda F, Dell’Orto P, Rocco B, et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2006;175(6):2201–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Denny-Brown D, Robertson E. On the physiology of micturition. Brain. 1933;56:149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Myers RP. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(3):473–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers RP, Goellner JR, Cahill DR. Prostate shape, external striated urethral sphincter and radical prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J Urol. 1987;138(3):543–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McNeal JE. Normal histology of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988;12:619–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berman DM, Veltri RW. Development, molecular biology, and physiology of the prostate. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2011. p. 2533–69.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH. Development of the urogenital system. In: Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH, editors. Larsen’s human embryology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Chirchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 511–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xia T, Blackburn WR, Gardner Jr WA. Fetal prostate growth and development. Pediatr Pathol. 1990;10:527–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Andrew DJ, Ewald AJ. Morphogenesis of epithelial tubes: insights into tube formation, elongation, and elaboration. Dev Biol. 2010;341:34–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Affolter M, Zeller R, Caussinus E. Tissue remodelling through branching morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:831–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bieberich CJ, Fujita K, He WW, Jay G. Prostate-specific and androgen-dependent expression of a novel homeobox gene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:31779–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cunha GR, Ricke W, Thomson A, et al. Hormonal, cellular, and molecular regulation of normal and neoplastic prostatic development. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;92:221–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cunha GR. Mesenchymal-epithelial interactions: past, present, and future. Differentiation. 2008;76:578–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fasciana C, van der Made AC, Faber PW, Trapman J. Androgen regulation of the rat keratinocyte growth factor (KGF/FGF7) promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;220:858–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu W, Luo Y, Kan M, McKeehan WL. Fibroblast growth factor-10. A second candidate stromal to epithelial cell andromedin in prostate. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:12827–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Swyer GI. Post-natal growth changes in the human prostate. J Anat. 1944;78:130–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Costello M.D., FRACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Costello, A.J., Corcoran, N.M. (2013). Development, Applied, and Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate. In: Tewari, A. (eds) Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Perspective. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2864-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2864-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2863-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2864-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics