Skip to main content

Riparian Forest Ecosystems as Filters for Nonpoint-Source Pollution

  • Chapter
Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science

Summary

Riparian (streamside) ecosystems have been the subject of ecosystem research for about the last twenty years. Ecosystem research has shown that riparian areas are especially effective controllers of nitrogen and sediment movement to streams and other water bodies. Nitrogen control is primarily the result of biotic processes. Sediment control is primarily caused by physical processes that are enhanced by such biotic interactions as enhanced infiltration and leaf litter at the soil surface. Riparian areas are increasingly being used as a landscape-and watershed-management technique to reduce the risk of pollution and to create and preserve healthy stream ecosystems. The management practices recommended for riparian areas are based on ecosystem research. Riparian ecosystem policies and management are a success story for the application of ecosystem science to real-world problems. Riparian ecosystem research has been used to develop generalized management practices for USDA action agencies such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Forest Service. Ecosystem-management recommendations for riparian areas have been incorporated into such programs as the Coastal Zone Management Act Reauthorization and the Chesapeake Bay Program. The USDA has incorporated riparian policies into the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) reauthorized in the 1996 Farm Bill. The CRP allows farmers to voluntarily enroll such environmentally sensitive lands as riparian ecosystems because of the high environmental benefits associated with riparian areas compared to other lands. The success of riparian ecosystem research in shaping riparian policy and management results from multiple factors including: agreement among major studies on the effectiveness of riparian ecosystems for nonpoint-source pollution control; flexibility of management practices; and use of riparian ecosystems for multiple functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay. 1996.Riparian Forest Buffers—White Paper. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay. Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke, A.C., R.L. Henry III, D.M. Gillespie, and R.H. Hunter. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams.Fisheries10:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, P.A., R.E. Bilby, M.D. Bryant, C.A. Dolloff, G.B. Grette, R.A. House et al. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. Pages 143–190 in E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy eds.Streamside management forestry and fishery interactions.Institute Of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlke, J.K., and J.M. Denver. 1995. Combined use of groundwater dating, chemical, and isotopic analyses to resolve the history and fate of nitrate contamination in two agricultural watersheds.Water Resources Research31:2319–2339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borman, F.H., and G.E. Likens. 1967. Nutrient cycling.Science155:424–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, D.D., J.M. Sheridan, and R. Lowrance. 1996. Hydraulic gradients and flow rates of a shallow coastal plain aquifer in a forested riparian buffer.Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers39:865–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesapeake Executive Council. 1994. Directive No. 94–1: Riparian Forest Buffers. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesapeake Executive Council. 1996. Adoption Statement on Riparian Forest Buffers. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesters, G., and L.J. Schierow. 1985. A primer on nonpoint pollution.Journal of Soil & Water Conservation40:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichester, F.W. 1976. The impact of fertilizer use and crop management on nitrogen content of subsurface water draining from upland agricultural watersheds.Journal of Environmental Quality5:413–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A.B. 1990. Nitrate depletion in the riparian zone and stream channel of a small headwater catchment.Hydrobiologia202:13–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.R., J.W. Gilliam, R.B. Daniels, and W.P. Robarge. 1987. Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment.Soil Science Society of America Journal51:416–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D.L., and D.E. Weller. 1989. Factors limiting processes in freshwater wetlands: an agricultural primary stream riparian forest. Pages 9–23 in R. Sharitz and J. Gibbons, eds.Freshwater wetlands and wildlife. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D.L., T.E. Jordan, and D.E. Weller. 1994. Failure of agricultural riparian buffers to protect surface waters from groundwater contamination. InProceedings of the international conference on groundwater/surface water ecotones.Cambridge University Press. London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, R.B., and J.W. Gilliam. 1996. Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters.Soil Science Society of America Journal60:246–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha, T.A., R.B. Reneau, S. Mostaghimi, and D. Lee. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint-source pollution control.Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers32:513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosskey, M.G., R.C. Schultz, and T.M. Isenhart. 1997.A riparian buffer design for cropland. Agroforestry Notes No. 5. United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service-National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J.G. 1987. The role of woody vegetation in preventing ground water pollution by nitrogen from septic tank leachate.Water Resources Research21:605–614.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fail, J.L., Jr., B.L. Haines, and R.L. Todd. 1985. Riparian forest communities and their role in nutrient conservation in an agricultural watershed.American Journal of Alternative Agriculture2:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fail, J.L., Jr., M.N. Hamzah, B.L. Haines, and R.L. Todd. 1986. Above and below ground biomass, production, and element accumulation in riparian forests of an agricultural watershed. Pages 193–224 in D.L. Correll, ed.Watershed Research Perspectives.Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Workgroup. 1996. Forestry best management practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Tracking accomplishments. Forestry Workgroup, Nutrient Subcommittee. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissel, M.J. ed. 1977. Cycling of mineral nutrients in agricultural ecosystems.Agro-Ecosystems4:1–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S.V., F.J. Swanson, W.A. McKee, and K.W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones.BioScience41:540–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman, P.M., A.J. Gold, and R.C. Simmons. 1992. Nitrate dynamics in riparian forests: microbial studies.Journal of Environmental Quality21:666–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.C., P.M. Groffman, and A.J. Gold. 1994a. Denitrification in riparian wetlands receiving high and low groundwater nitrate inputs.Journal of Environmental Quality23:917–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.C., P.M. Groffman, and A.J. Gold. 1994b. Symptoms of nitrogen saturation in a riparian wetland.Ecological Applications4:750–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M.E., J.F. Franklin, F.J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S.V. Gregory, J.D. Lattin et al. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems.Advances in Ecological Research15:133–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, O.Q., Jr. 1982. Flux of nitrogen and carbon gases in bottomland soils of an agricultural watershed. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.R. 1990. Groundwater flow paths in relation to nitrogen chemistry in the near-stream zone.Hydrobiologia206:39–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.R. 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones.Journal of Environmental Quality25:743–755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, T.C., and J.W. Gilliam. 1985. Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters.Journal of Environmental Quality14:472–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, N.A., P.M. Groffman, A. Keller, and A.C. Prager. 1992. A watershed-scale analysis of nitrogen loading: the Upper Potomac River.Estuaries15:83–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T.E., D.L. Correll, and D.E. Weller. 1993. Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland.Journal of Environmental Quality22:467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W.A., L.E. Asmussen, E.W. Hauser, and A.W. White. 1973. Nitrate in surface runoff and subsurface flow from a small agricultural watershed.Journal of Environmental Quality2:480–482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R., and I.J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land-water interface.Science201:229–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, D.H., G.B. Shearer, and B. Commoner. 1971. Fertilizer nitrogen: contribution to surface water nitrate in a cornbelt watershed.Science174:1331–1334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E., F.H. Bormann, R.S. Pierce, J.S. Eaton, and N.M. Johnson. 1977.Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem.Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R.R., R.L. Todd, and L.E. Asmussen. 1983. Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed.Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment10:371–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., R.L. Todd, and L.E. Asmussen. 1984a. Nutrient cycling in an agricultural watershed: I. Phreatic movement.Journal of Environmental Quality13: 22–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R.R., R.L. Todd, J. Fail, Jr., O. Hendrickson, Jr., R. Leonard, and L. Asmussen. 1984b. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds.Bioscience34:374–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., R.A. Leonard, L.E. Asmussen, and R.L. Todd. 1985. Nutrient budgets for agricultural watersheds in the southeastern coastal plains.Ecology66:287–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., J.K. Sharpe, and J.M. Sheridan. 1986. Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal plain watershed.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation41:266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., S. McIntyre, and J.C. Lance. 1988. Erosion and deposition in a coastal plain watershed measured using CS-137.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation43:195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R. 1992. Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a coastal plain riparian soil.Journal of Environmental Quality21:401–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., L.S. Altier, J.D. Newbold, R.R. Schnabel, P.M. Groffman, and J.M. Denver. 1995.Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.Report No. EPA 903-R-95–004; CBP/TRS 134/95. U.S. Em. Profection Hgencyl Chesapeake Bay Program Office Annapolis. MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, R., G. Vellidis, R.D. Wauchope, P. Gay, and D.D. Bosch. 1997. Herbicide transport in a managed riparian forest buffer system.Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers40:1047–1057.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magette, W.L., R.B. Brinsfield, R.E. Palmer, and J.D. Wood. 1989. Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips.Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers32:663–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.L., and J. O’Hop. 1983. The effects of watershed disturbance on dissolved organic dynamics of a stream.American Midland Naturalist109:175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C.F., J. Meek, S. Tuller, and A. Weinberg. 1985. Nonpoint-sources of water pollution.Journal of Soil & Water Conservation40:14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn, W.T., and D.L. Correll. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest.Ecology65:1466–1475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.J., J.M. Denver, R.J. Shedlock, and P.A. Hamilton. 1993. Effect of forested wetlands on nitrate concentrations in ground water and surface water on the Delmarva Peninsula.Wetlands13:75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, T.E., L.N. Plummer, P.J. Phillips, and E. Busenberg. 1994. The use of simulation and multiple environmental tracers to quantify ground water flow in a shallow aquifer.Water Resources Research421–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L.A., A.B. Cooper, C.G. Harfoot, and W.J. Dyck. 1993. Regulators of denitrification in an organic riparian soil.Soil Biology and Biochemistry25:925–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R.C., J. Colletti, W. Simpkins, M. Thompson, and C. Mize. 1994. Developing a multispecies riparian buffer strip agroforestry system. Pages 203–225 inRiparian ecosystems in the humid U.S.: Functions values and management.National Association of Conservation Districts, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R.C., A.J. Gold, and P.M. Groffman. 1992. Nitrate dynamics in riparian forests: groundwater studies.Journal of Environmental Quality21:659–665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stayer, K.W., and R.B. Brinsfield. 1996. Seepage of groundwater nitrate from a riparian agroecosystem into the Wye River estuary.Estuaries19:359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, W.T., and J.E. Douglass. 1977. Nutrient budgets for undisturbed and manipulated hardwood forest ecosystems in the mountains of North Carolina. Pages 343–362 in D.L. Correll ed.Watershed research in eastern North America.Smithsonian Institution, Edgewater, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, B.W. 1993. Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in eastern North America.Proceedings Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia144:291–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L.M. 1985. Management of nonpoint-source pollution: what priority?Journal Soil & Water Conservaton40:8.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. 1997. Clinton administration announces final conservation program rules. USDA Press Release No. 0046.97.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA NRCS. 1995.Riparian Forest Buffer 391. Model state standard and general specifications. Watershed Science Institute, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1991.Guidance for water quality based decisions: the TMDL process. Report No. EPA 440/4–91–001. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1993.Guidance specifying management measures for sources of nonpoint pollution in coastal waters. Report No. EPA-840-B-93–001c. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1994.National Water Quality Inventory: 1994 Report to Congress. Report No. EPA 503/9–94/006. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P.M., and W.A. Reiners. 1975. Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis.BioScience25:376–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, J., and A.R. Hill. 1988. Nitrate depletion in the riparian zone of a small woodland stream.Hydrobiologia157:231–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, D.J. 1991.Riparian Forest Buffers. United States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service Pub. No. NA-PR-07–91. United States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service, Radnor, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, P., and J.M. Sheridan. 1983. Estimating the effectiveness of vegetated floodplains/wetlands as nitrate-nitrite and orthophosphorus filters.Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment9:303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowrance, R. (1998). Riparian Forest Ecosystems as Filters for Nonpoint-Source Pollution. In: Pace, M.L., Groffman, P.M. (eds) Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1724-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1724-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98475-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1724-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics