Skip to main content

What Is a “Personal” Relationship? A Rhetorical-Responsive Account of “Unfinished Business”

  • Chapter
Attributions, Accounts, and Close Relationships

Abstract

In their discussion of narratives of relationship, Gergen and Gergen (1987) discuss relationship difficulties, in which talk of a “we” or an “us” changes into talk of “I” and “you”—instead of “We must think about this,” the couple begin to say, “You and I must talk about it.” Such phrasings are often constituents of a “regressive narrative” in a failing relationship, they say (p. 283). What I want to do in this chapter is partially to agree—such a change often does indicate difficulties in an intimate relationship—but also to explore other than “narrative” reasons why this is so. However, as I feel that the problem of distress in personal relations cannot be properly understood until the problem of what, conceptually, a personal relationship is, has been clarified, that is the main task that I shall set myself in the analysis below, only to return to the problem above right at the very end.

The love story is the tribute the lover must pay to the world in order to be reconciled with it. (Barthes, 1983, p. 8)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberoni, F. (1984). Falling in love. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, F. (1858). Of the dignity and advancement of learning. London: Longman. (Original work pubhshed 1605).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (Vern W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1983). A lover’s discourse. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L.A. (1988). A dialectical perspective on communicational strategies in relationship development. In S.W. Duck, D.F. Day, S.E. Hobfall, W. Iches & B. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of Personal Relationships. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L.A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relations, 7, 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A. & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in american life. Berkeley, CA: University of CaHfornia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, R. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S.W. (1990). Relationships as unfinished business: Out of the frying pan and into the 1990’s. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, A.O. & Shotter, J. (1977) Human action and its psychological investigation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. & Gergen, M. (1987) Narratives of relationship. In R. Burnett, P. McGee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for personal relationships: Social representations of interpersonal links. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1980). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, H. (1978). Meaning—Who needs it?. In M. Brenner, P. Marsh, & M. Brenner (Eds.), The social contexts of method. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. (1985). The word and the world. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1984). Testability, flexibility: Kuhnian values in scientists’ discourse concerning theory choice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14, 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Mulkay, M. (1982). Making theory useful: Utility accounting in social psychologists’ discourse. Fundamenta Scientiae, 34, 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelli, L.J. (1989). The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos. In H. Simons (Ed.), Rhetoric in the human sciences. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1985). Orientalism. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E.E. (1990). Social psychology and social control. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1986). A sense of place: Vico and the social production of social identities. British journal of social psychology, 25, 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1987). The social construction of an “us”: Problems of accountability and narratology. In R. Burnett, P. McGee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for personal relationships: Social representations of interpersonal links. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1989). The social construction of “you”. In J. Shotter & K.J. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1990). Social individuality versus possessive individualism: The sounds of silence. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shotter, J. (1992). What Is a “Personal” Relationship? A Rhetorical-Responsive Account of “Unfinished Business”. In: Harvey, J.H., Orbuch, T.L., Weber, A.L. (eds) Attributions, Accounts, and Close Relationships. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4386-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4386-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8750-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4386-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics