Abstract
In their discussion of narratives of relationship, Gergen and Gergen (1987) discuss relationship difficulties, in which talk of a “we” or an “us” changes into talk of “I” and “you”—instead of “We must think about this,” the couple begin to say, “You and I must talk about it.” Such phrasings are often constituents of a “regressive narrative” in a failing relationship, they say (p. 283). What I want to do in this chapter is partially to agree—such a change often does indicate difficulties in an intimate relationship—but also to explore other than “narrative” reasons why this is so. However, as I feel that the problem of distress in personal relations cannot be properly understood until the problem of what, conceptually, a personal relationship is, has been clarified, that is the main task that I shall set myself in the analysis below, only to return to the problem above right at the very end.
The love story is the tribute the lover must pay to the world in order to be reconciled with it. (Barthes, 1983, p. 8)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alberoni, F. (1984). Falling in love. New York: Random House.
Bacon, F. (1858). Of the dignity and advancement of learning. London: Longman. (Original work pubhshed 1605).
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (Vern W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barthes, R. (1983). A lover’s discourse. New York: Hill and Wang.
Baxter, L.A. (1988). A dialectical perspective on communicational strategies in relationship development. In S.W. Duck, D.F. Day, S.E. Hobfall, W. Iches & B. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of Personal Relationships. London: Wiley.
Baxter, L.A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relations, 7, 69–88.
Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A. & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in american life. Berkeley, CA: University of CaHfornia Press.
Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79–103.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, R. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage Publications.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Duck, S.W. (1990). Relationships as unfinished business: Out of the frying pan and into the 1990’s. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 5–28.
Gauld, A.O. & Shotter, J. (1977) Human action and its psychological investigation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gergen, K.J. & Gergen, M. (1987) Narratives of relationship. In R. Burnett, P. McGee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for personal relationships: Social representations of interpersonal links. London: Methuen.
Giddens, A. (1980). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?. London: Duckworth.
Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menzel, H. (1978). Meaning—Who needs it?. In M. Brenner, P. Marsh, & M. Brenner (Eds.), The social contexts of method. London: Croom Helm.
Mulkay, M. (1985). The word and the world. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Perelman, C, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1958.
Potter, J. (1984). Testability, flexibility: Kuhnian values in scientists’ discourse concerning theory choice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14, 303–330.
Potter, J., & Mulkay, M. (1982). Making theory useful: Utility accounting in social psychologists’ discourse. Fundamenta Scientiae, 34, 259–278.
Prelli, L.J. (1989). The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos. In H. Simons (Ed.), Rhetoric in the human sciences. London: Sage Publications.
Said, E. (1985). Orientalism. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Sampson, E.E. (1990). Social psychology and social control. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.
Shotter, J. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shotter, J. (1986). A sense of place: Vico and the social production of social identities. British journal of social psychology, 25, 199–211.
Shotter, J. (1987). The social construction of an “us”: Problems of accountability and narratology. In R. Burnett, P. McGee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for personal relationships: Social representations of interpersonal links. London: Methuen.
Shotter, J. (1989). The social construction of “you”. In J. Shotter & K.J. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity. London: Sage Publications.
Shotter, J. (1990). Social individuality versus possessive individualism: The sounds of silence. In I. Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology. London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shotter, J. (1992). What Is a “Personal” Relationship? A Rhetorical-Responsive Account of “Unfinished Business”. In: Harvey, J.H., Orbuch, T.L., Weber, A.L. (eds) Attributions, Accounts, and Close Relationships. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4386-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4386-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8750-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4386-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive