Skip to main content

Generation of Multiple Knowledge from Databases Based on Rough Sets Theory

  • Chapter
Rough Sets and Data Mining

Abstract

In this paper we present a new approach to generate multiple knowledge using rough sets theory. The idea is to generate several knowledge bases instead of one knowledge base for the classification of new object, hoping that the combination of answers of multiple knowledge bases result in better performance. Multiple knowledge bases can be formulated precisely and in an unified way within the framework of rough sets theory. Our approach is based on the reducts and decision matrix of the rough set theory. Our method first eliminates the superfluous attributes from the databases, next, the minimal decision rules are obtained through decision matrices. Then a set of reducts which include all the indispensable attributes to the learning task are computed, finally, the minimal decision rules are grouped to the corresponding reducts to form different knowledge bases. We attempt to make a theoretical model by using rough sets theory to explain the generation of multiple knowledge. The distinctive feature of our method over other methods of generating multiple knowledge is that in our method, each knowledge base is as accurate and complete as possible and at the same time as different from the other knowledge bases as possible. The test result shows the higher classification accuracy produced by multiple knowledge bases than that produced by single knowledge base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Cestnik and I. Bratko, “Learning Redundant Rules in Noisy Domains” in Prod, of European Conf. on AI, Munich, Germany, pp348–350, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Gams, “New Measurements Highlight the Importance of Redundant Knowledge” in Proc. 4th Europe Working Session on Learning, Montpellier, pp71–80, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Hu, and N. Shan, “Rough Set and Multiple Knowledge Bases” in Proc. of the 7th Florida AI Research Symposium, Pensacola Beach, FL, USA, pp255–258, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  4. X. Hu, N. Cercone, “Discovery of Decision Rules from Databases”, in the 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM94), Nov., 1994

    Google Scholar 

  5. X. Hu, N. Cercone, “Learning from Databases: A Rough Set Approach”, in Computational Intelligence: An International Journal, 11(2), 323–338, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Hu, “Knowledge Discovery from Databases: An Attribute-Oriented Rough Set Approach” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Regina, Canada, June 1995

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Kononenko, “An Experiment in Machine learning of Redundant Knowledge” in Proc. Intern Conf MELECON, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp1146–1149

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Kononenko and M. Kovacie, “Learning as Optimization: Stochastic Generation of Multiple knowledge” in Proc. of the 9th International Workshop on Machine Learning, Aberden, Scotland, July 1–3, pp. 256–262, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Pawlak, “Rough Sets” in International Journal of Information and Computer Science, Vol. 11(5), pp341–356, 1982

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Skowron and C. Rauszer, C, “The Discernibility Matrices and Functions in Information Systems” in Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of Rough Sets Theory, edited by R. Slowinski, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Slowinski, Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of Rough Sets Theory” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Torgo, “Controlled Redundancy in Incremental Rule Learning” in Proc. of European Conf. on Machine Learning, pp l85–195, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.M. Weiss and I. Kapouleas, “An Empirical Comparison of Pattern Recognition Neural Nets, and Machine Learning Classification Methods”, Proc. of the 11th International Joint Conf. on AI, pp 781–787, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Ziarko, Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Ziarko and N. Shan, “A Method For Computing All Maximally General Rules in Attribute-Value Systems” in Computational Intelligence: An International Journal, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Ziarko, N. Cercone, X. Hu, “Rule Discovery from Databases with Decision Matrices”, to appear in proceeding of the 9th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hu, X., Cercone, N., Ziarko, W. (1997). Generation of Multiple Knowledge from Databases Based on Rough Sets Theory. In: Rough Sets and Data Mining. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1461-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1461-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8637-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1461-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics