Abstract
Since its formulation in 1974, the MIT bag model in various versions has acquired a considerable following. It is neither possible nor desirable for me to attempt to review all of the bag related developments of the past five years. A few works of a review nature exist. These are listed in Ref. 1–4. I shall give a brief introduction to the model in the static cavity approximation, since this approach has been the starting point for many applications. Following this is a discussion of deformations of the bag, applied to a calculation of the electric polarizability of the π meson, and applied to rotationally excited states. Some recent results regarding hadronic interactions are reviewed, in particular, for low energy nucleon-nucleon interactions and for meson-meson interactions. Finally, I shall discuss some recent efforts at treating low energy pion interactions in the bag model using PCAC.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Footnotes
K. Johnson, Acta Phys. Polonica B6, 865 (1975).
K. Johnson, Proc. of the Seventeenth Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, St. Andrews (1976), ed. by I. M. Barbour and A.T. Davis.
P. Hasenfratz and J. Kuti, Phys. Reports 40C, 75 (19 78).
A.T.M. Aerts. The MIT Bagmodel and Some Spectroscopic Applications (Krips Repro, Meppel, The Netherlands, 1979 ) ( Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen).
A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C.B. Thorn, and V.F. Weisskopf, Phys. Rev. D9, 3471 (1974).
A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and C.B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D10, 2599 (1974). T.A. DeGrand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and J. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. DL2, 2060 (1975) referred to as DJJK.
A. Chodos and Charles B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D12, 2733 (1975).
J.J.J. Kokkedee. The Quark Model (Benjamin, New York, 1969 ).
C. Bender and P. Hays, Phys. Rev. D14, 2622 (1976).
K. Johnson, Coral Gables talk, MIT-CTP 766 (1979).
C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D12, 2407 (1975); Phys. Rev. D14, 2362 (1976). T.A. DeGrand and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D17, 2358.
T.A. DeGrand and R.L. Jaffe, Ann. Phys. (NY) JL00, 425 (1976). T.A. DeGrand, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 496 (1976).
K. Johnson, Phys. Letters 78B, 259 (1978).
C. Callen, R. Dashen, and D. Gross, Phys. Rev. D19, 1826 (1979).
G.E. Brown and Mannque Rho, Phys. Letters 82B, 177 ( 1979 ); G.E. Brown, Mannque Rho, and Vincent Vento, SUNY Stony Brook report (1979).
T.D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D19, 1802 (1979); R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D18, 2623 (1978). See also J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D9, 3501 (1974), M. Creutz and K.S. Soh, Phys. Rev. D12, 443 (1975), and K. Huang and Daniel R. Stump, Phys. Rev. D14, 223 (1976).
S. Mandelstam, Physics Rep. 23C, 245 (1976).
Daniel Lu, private communication (1979).
C. DeTar, Phys. Rev. D17, 302, 323 (1978); 19, 1028 (E) (1979).
C. DeTar, Phys. Rev. D19, 1451 (1979).
K. Johnson and C.B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D13, 1934 (1976); K. Johnson and C. Nohl, Phys. Rev. DI291 (1979).
C. Rebbi, Phys. Rep. 12C, 1 (1974).
E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, K. Lane, T. Kinoshita, and T.-M Yan, Phys. Rev. D17, 3090 (1978).
A. Chodos and C.B. Thorn, Nucl. Phys. B72, 509 (1974). See also K. Kikkawa, Phys. Rev. D18, 2606 (1978); K. Kikkawa, Tsuneyuki Kotani, Masa-aki Sato, and Masakatsu Kenmoku, Phys. Rev. D19, 1011 (1979).
R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D15, 267, 281 (1977).
R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D17, 1444 (1978). Chan-Hong Mo et al., Phys. Lett. 76B, 634 (1978).
P.J.G. Mulders, A. Th. M. Aerts, and J.J. DeSwart, Phys. Rev. Letters 40, 1543 (1978).
M. Baranger and M. Veneroni, Ann. Physics (N.Y.) 114, 123 (1978).
R.L. Jaffe and F.E. Low, MIT-CTP 747 (19 79).
E.P. Wigner, and L. Eisenbud, Phys. Rev. 72, 29 (1947).
G.T. Fairley and E.J. Squires, Nucl. Phys. B93, 56 (1975).
F.E. Low, Phys. Rev. D12, 163 (1975).
R.S. Willey, Phys. Rev. D18, 270 (1978). See also P.M. Fishbane and M.T. Grisaru, Phys. Rev. Letters 40, 931 (1978).
M.M. Nagels, T.A. Rijken and J.J. DeSwart, Phys. Rev. D17, 768 (1978).
For another approach, see C.E. Carlson, F. Myhrer, and G.E. Brown, SUNY Stony Brook report (1979).
See, for example, G.F. Chew, The Analytic S-Matrix (Benjamin, New York, 1966).
S.L. Adler and R.F. Dashen. Current Algebras (Benjamin, New York, 1968). H. Pagels, Phys. Reports 16C, 219 (1975).
S.B. Treiman, R. Jackiw, and D.J. Gross. Lectures on Current Algebra and Its Applications (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1972), p. 101 ff.
J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 127, 965 (1962).
Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy, Nuovo Cim. 16, 705 (1960).
John F. Donoghue and K. Johnson, MIT-CTP 802 (1979).
S. Weinberg, Harvard preprint HUTP-77/A057; J. Gunion et al., Nucl. Phys. B23, 445 (1977).
Donoghue and Johnson (Ref. 42) give a slightly different estimate of the c.m. correction, namely pm 10/(mR), and find g= 1.27. They also calculate an improved magnetic moment for the proton: 2mpyp =2.5 and charge radius = (0.82)fm. Experimental values for the last two are 2.79 and (0.88)2n.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
DeTar, C. (1980). The Mit Bag Model. In: Mahanthappa, K.T., Randa, J. (eds) Quantum Flavordynamics, Quantum Chromodynamics, and Unified Theories. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 54. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3099-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3099-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3101-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive