Skip to main content

Detection of Signals in the Presence of Strong, Signal-Like Interference and Impulse Noise

  • Chapter
Topics in Non-Gaussian Signal Processing

Abstract

We assume that the noise which interferes with signal detection can be considered to be a mixture of non-stationary, high-amplitude, non-Gaussian components plus a low amplitude Gaussian stationary component. Such a model appears to be widely applicable. The methodology that we propose for signal detection is to identify, categorize, model, and remove the non-Gaussian components in a piece-wise fashion based on their ease of separability from the background Gaussian noise and weak signals. This approach to modeling and processing complicated and non-stationary data is similar to that of experimental physicists going back at least to the time of Newton and perhaps most clearly articulated by Eugene Wigner in his Nobel Prize lecture [1]. Liu and Nolte [2] and Claus, Kadota, and Romain [3] have shown that when the noise is Gaussian and consists of a sum of a strong highly coherent component and a weak component of independent noise samples, then estimation and subtraction of the coherent noise component is nearly optimal. The application of special data smoothers and data cleaners by Martin and Thomson [4] for obtaining robust spectral estimates when the data is contaminated by outliers has provided another motivation for our use of adaptive differential quantization for robust detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wigner, Eugene, Nobel Prize address, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, S.C., Nolte, W.N., “Performance Evaluation of Array Processors for Detecting Gaussian Acoustic Signals,” IEEE Trans. ASSP, Vol. ASSP–28, No. 3, June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Claus, A.J., Kadota, T.T., Romain, D.M., “Efficient Approximation for a Family of Noises for Application in Adaptive Spatial Processing for Signal Detection,” IEEE Trans, on Information Theory, Vol. IT–26, pp. 588–595, September 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, R.D., Thomson, D.J., “Robust–Resistant Spectrum Estimation,” Proc. of IEEE, Vol. 70, No. 9, September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Veitch, J.G., Wilks, A.R., “A Characterization of Arctic Undersea Noise,” Office of Naval Research, Princeton University, Report No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kirsteins, I., Tufts, D.W., “Methods of Computer–Aided Analysis of Non– Gaussian Noise and Application to Robust Adaptive Detection,” Tech. Report–Part II, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Swaszek, P.F., Tufts, D.W., Efron, A.J., “Detection in Impulsive Environments,” Letters, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 73, No. 12, December 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tufts, D.W. Kumaresan, R., Kirsteins, I., “Data Adaptive Signal Estimation by Singular Value Decomposition of a Data Matrix,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 70, No. 6, June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tufts, D.W., Kumaresan, R., “Estimation of Frequencies of Multiple Sinusoids: Making Linear Prediction Perform Like Maximum Likelihood,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 70, No. 9, September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumaresan, R., Tufts, D.W., “A Two Dimensional Technique for Frequency Wavenumber Estimation,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 69, No. 11, November 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumaresan, R., Tufts, D.W., “Estimating the Parameters of Exponentially Damped Sinusoids and Pole–Zero Modeling in Noise,” IEEE Trans, on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vol. ASSP–30, No. 6, December 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumaresan, R., Tufts, D.W., Scharf, L.L., “A Prony Method for Noisy Data: Choosing the Signal Components and Selecting the Order in Exponential Signal Models,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 72, No. 2, February 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tufts, D.W., Kirsteins, I., Kumaresan, R., “Data–Adaptive Detection of a Weak Signal,” IEEE Trans, on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES–19, No. 2, March 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hildebrand, F.B., Introduction to Numerical Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York, 1956.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lanczos, C., Applied Analysis, Prentice–Hall, Inc., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parlett, B., The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem, Prentice Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F., Matrix Computations, John Hopkins University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boudreaux, G.F., Parks, T.W., “Discrete Fourier Transform Using Summation by Parts,” submitted to IEEE Trans. ASSP.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bracewell, R.N., “The Fast Hartley Transform,” Proc. IEEE, Vol. 72, No. 8, August 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumaresan, R., Gupta, P.K., “A Real–Arithmetic Prime Factor Fourier Transform Algorithm and Its Implementation,” submitted to IEEE Trans. ASSP.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kirsteins, I.P., Tufts, D.W., “On the Probability Density of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in an Improved Adaptive Detector,” presented at ICASSP 85, Tampa, Florida, March 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kirsteins, I.P., Tufts, D.W., “On the Probability Density of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in an Improved Adaptive Detector,” Tech. Report - Part I, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, J.H, Thomas, J.B., “Detectors for Discrete–Time Signals in Non– Gaussian Noise,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT–18, pp. 241–250, March 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, R.D., Schwartz, S.C., “Robust Detection of a Known Signal in Nearly Gaussian Noise,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT–17, pp. 50–56, January 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dwyer, R.F., “A Technique for Improving Detection and Estimation of Signals Contaminated by Under Ice Noise,” NUSC Tech. Doc. #6717, July 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beckman, R.J., Cook, R.D., “Outlier s,” Technometrics, Vol. 25, pp. 119–163, February 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Trees, H.L., Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. Pt. 1, New York, Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, J.H., Thomas, J.B., “The Detection of Signals in Impulsive Noise Modeled as a Mixture Process,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM–24, pp. 559–568, May 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tufts, D.W., Kirsteins, I.P., Swaszek, P.F., Efron, A.J., Melissinos, C.D. (1989). Detection of Signals in the Presence of Strong, Signal-Like Interference and Impulse Noise. In: Wegman, E.J., Schwartz, S.C., Thomas, J.B. (eds) Topics in Non-Gaussian Signal Processing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8859-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8859-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8861-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8859-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics