Skip to main content

Japanese Firms’ Innovation Strategies in the Twenty-First Century: An Institutional View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

Abstract

The landscape within which Japanese companies innovate stands altered by events of the past two decades. Buffeted and metamorphosed by the forces of a severe asset value decline beginning in 1990, and a decade of economic malaise, followed by a subsequent decade of growth – and now the recent financial crisis – Japanese firms are transforming their innovation strategies because the national institutional framework of those strategies is altered by new economic realities. Even though the basis of the strategies that evolve from the framework, and perhaps the strategies themselves, are changing, Japan is more than maintaining its level of innovation, according to recent data. Even small companies seem to be increasingly part of recent innovation outcomes. So we ask, how is the level maintained given that the strategies that created Japan’s acknowledged industrial innovativeness seem to be transformed by events?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As an indication of the efficiency of Japanese manufacturing, Japan’s advantage remains substantial after scaling for the percentage of (less polluting) services in the economy (Japan 68% of GDP, China 40%, and Singapore 68% in 2006, according to World Bank figures).

References

  • Aminian, N., K. Fung, et al. (2007). Foreign Direct Investment, Intra-Regional Trade and Production Sharing in East Asia. RIETI Discussion Paper Series: 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2001).Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Areddy, J. T. (2009). “Optimism Over China’s Green Technology Market” Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., T. Hikino, et al. (2001). Inventing the Electronic Century: The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industries. New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (1999). “The organizational impact of technological change: a comparative theory of national institutional factors”. Industrial and Corporate Change 8(3): 447–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K. and P. Tomlinson (2003). The Problem of Regional ‘Hollowing Out’ in Japan. Urban and Regional prosperity in a globalised New Economy. R. Sugden, R. H. Cheng and G. R. Meadows. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar: 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujarric, R. and A. Hagiu (2009). Capitalizing On Innovation: The Case of Japan, Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, R. (2009). Corporate Governance Systems and Firm Value: Empirical Evidence for the Value of Committee Systems with Outside Directors. Shorenstein APARC Working paper Series. Palo Alto, CA, Stanford University: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, D. (2008). “The Japanese Innovation System: University-Industry Linkages, Small Firms and Regional Technology Clusters”. Prometheus 26(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. D. (1999). A Critical Evaluation of Japanese Accounting Changes Since 1997. Japanese Studies. Sheffield, University of Sheffield. MA: 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, K. and J. Ries (2002). “Offshore Production and Skill Upgrading by Japanese Manufacturing Firms.” Journal of International Economics 58(1): 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, T. and A. K. Kashyap (1999). “The Japanese Banking Crisis: Where Did It Come from and How Will It End?” Macroeconomics Annual 14: 129–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. (2007). The Japanese System from a Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economiocs. H. Hanusch and A. Pyka, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.I.L.P.T (2008). Japanese Working Life Profile 2008/2009 - Labor Statistics, The Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. and R. Florida (1988). “Beyond Mass Production: Production and the Labor Process in Japan.” Politics Society 16: 121–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, R. (2007). Bridging Islands: Venture Companies and the Future of Japanese and American Industry, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maswood, S. and H. Miyajima, Eds. (2002). Change and Overhaul in the J-type firm: Stepping back bank-centred governance and increasing role of internal governance. Changes and Continuity in Japan, Curzon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt, C. J. and M. D. West (2004). Economic organizations and corporate governance in Japan : the impact of formal and informal rules. Oxford ; New York, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Motohashi, K. (2003). “The Japanese Model: Shifts in Comparative Advantage due to the IT Revolution and Modularization.” Journal of Japanese Trade & Industry(November / December 2003): 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka, S. and K. Flamm (2006). The Chrysanthemum Meets the Eagle: The Coevolution of Innovation Policies in Japan and the United States. 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change, Tokyo, National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noland, M. (2007). Industrial Policy, Innovation Policy, and Japanese Competitiveness. Washington D.C., Peterson Institute for International Economics: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L., European University Institute., et al. (2001). Japanese corporate governance at a crossroads : variation in “varieties of capitalism”? San Domenico (FI), Italy, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization, W. H. (2004). “10 Health Questions about the 10.” Retrieved September 21, 2009, 2009, from http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E82865.pdf.

  • Osono, E., H. Takeuchi, et al. (2008). Extreme Toyota. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechter, K. (2001). Japanese Innovation Reform in the Light of Past Dialogue: Conceptions of Convergence as Perspectives for Comparative System Assessment. Tokyo, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaede, U. (2008). Choose and focus : Japanese business strategies for the 21st century. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger, R. J. (1982). Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity. New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (1999). “Patterns of control within Japanese manufacturing plants in China: doubts about Japanization in Asia.” Journal of Management Studies 36(6): 853–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. K. (2006). Japan remodeled : how government and industry are reforming Japanese capitalism. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimori, M. (2005). “Does Corporate Governance Matter? Why the Corporate Performance of Toyota and Canon is Superior to GM and Xerox.” Journal of Corporate Governance 13(3): 447–457(11).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Eberhart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eberhart, R., Hoetker, G. (2012). Japanese Firms’ Innovation Strategies in the Twenty-First Century: An Institutional View. In: Assimakopoulos, D., Carayannis, E., Dossani, R. (eds) Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0248-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics