Skip to main content

Young People, Their Families and Social Supports: Understanding Resilience with Complexity Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Social Ecology of Resilience

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors take the innovative approach of exploring the way complexity theory can help us understand resilience among young people. The chapter uses a case example to apply three aspects of complexity theory to practice, demonstrating how complexity theory is congruent with an ecological understanding of the supports (family and otherwise) that make resilience more likely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For information on the SKIP initiative, see http://www.familyservices.govt.nz/working-with-us/programmes-services/positive-parenting/skip-index.html. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.

References

  • Andriani, P. (2001). Diversity, knowledge and complexity theory: Some introductory issues. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backett-Milburn, K., Wilson, S., Bancroft, A., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2008). Challenging childhoods: Young people’s accounts of “getting by” in families with substance use problems. Childhood, 15(4), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belliveau, G., & Beare, D. (2007). Theatre for positive youth development: A model for collaborative play-creating. Applied Theatre Researcher, 7. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/52892/04-beare-belliveau-final.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.

  • Bloch, D. (2005). Complexity, chaos and non-linear dynamics: A new perspective on career development theory. Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, A. E. (1996). Resilient single mothers in risky neighborhoods: Negative psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckle Henning, P. (2010). Disequilibrium, development and resilience through adult life. In Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the ISSS,  Proceedings of the 54th meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, M. (1992). Chaos: An omen of transcendence in the psychotherapy process. Psychological Reports, 71, 827–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, M. (1997). Chaos and complexity: Implications for psychological theory and practice. Washington: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (forthcoming). Exploring the career pathways of high school graduates in Canada: A grounded theory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massey University, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L., McKinnon, M., & Rains, P. (2001). Creating a family: Perspectives from teen mothers. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 12(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emison, G. (2008). Complex adaptive systems and unconventional progress for the national air quality management system. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2010). Complexity theory, leadership and the traps of utopia. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(2), 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geronimus, A. T. (2003). Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 57(5), 881–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. (2000). Tears and laughter in the margins. NORA: Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Horn, S., Kaipuke, R., Maden, B., Maden, E., Stuckey, B., et al. (2009). The Spinafex effect – A theory of change. Wellington: The Families Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, C. G. (2000). At the edge of chaos: A new paradigm for social work? Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoucane-Benson, P. (2005). A complex ecological framework of aboriginal family resilience. Paper presented at 30th anniversary conference first nations – first thoughts. Centre of Canadian Studies, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.cst.ed.ac.uk/2005conference/papers/LaBoucane-Benson_paper.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.

  • Ladner, J. (1971). Tomorrow’s tomorrow: The black woman. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. (1986). Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Physica D, 22, 120–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2009). Introduction: The challenges in researching resilience. In L. Liebenberg & M. Ungar (Eds.), Researching resilience (pp. 3–25). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litaker, D., Tomolo, A., Liberatore, V., Stange, K., & Aron, D. (2006). Using complexity theory to build interventions that improve health care delivery in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 30–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2009). Making educational development and change sustainable: Insights from complexity theory. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, J. (2008). Adaptive intermediate structures and local sustainability advances. Pubic Administration Quarterly, Fall, 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, J. (2010). Complexity theory for public administration and policy. Editorial. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation, 12(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischen, P., & Jackson, S. (2008). Connecting the dots: Applying complexity theory, knowledge management and social network analysis to policy implementation. Public Administration Quarterly, Fall, 315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2007). Drawing out strengths and building capacity in social work with troubled young women. Child and Family Social Work, 13, 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., Sanders, J., & Maden, B. (2006). Small steps and giant leaps at Te Aroha Noa. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 9(1–2), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Gillham, V., Giacaman, R., Naser, G., & Boyce, W. (2008). Normalising the abnormal: Palestinian youth and the contradictions of resilience in protracted conflict. Health and Social Care in the Community, 16(3), 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plsek, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. British Medical Journal, 323, 625–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, R. G. L., & Bright, J. E. H. (2007). Applying chaos theory to careers: Attraction and attractors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2008). Conformity and resistance in self-management strategies of “good girls”. Childhood, 15(4), 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & O’Neil, D. (1996). Beyond child rescue: Developing child-centred practice as St Lukes. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2005). Complexity theory for organisational futures studies. Foresight, 7(3), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, I., & Cox, P. (2008). Complexity theory: Developing new understandings of child protection in field settings and in residential child care. British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1320–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, I., & Haslett, P. (2007). Applying complexity theory to risk in child protection practice. Childhood, 14(1), 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W., & Cabrera, D. (2005). The complexity of concept mapping for policy analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation, 7(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M. (2004). Nurturing hidden resilience in at-risk youth across cultures. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(2), 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 218–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M. (2011). The social and physical ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K., Franklin, C., & Streeter, C. (1998). New directions in systems theory: Chaos and complexity. Social Work, 3(4), 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Hayday, B. (1999). A board’s journey into complexity science: Lessons from (and for) staff and board members. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., Lindgberg, C., & Plsek, P. (1998). Nine emerging and connected organisational leadership principles. Retrieved from http://www.plexus­institute.org/ideas/show_elibrary.cfm?id=151. Accessed 21 Feb 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jackie Sanders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanders, J., Munford, R., Liebenberg, L. (2012). Young People, Their Families and Social Supports: Understanding Resilience with Complexity Theory. In: Ungar, M. (eds) The Social Ecology of Resilience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics