Skip to main content

Assessment for Game-Based Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment in Game-Based Learning

Abstract

Looking at the historical synopsis of games, an antagonism between games and work is noticeable. However, another important question is present: How can a game be beneficial for life? Games are classified as fully recreational games, serious games for informal context, serious games for formal context, and as assessment games. However, the implementation of assessment features into game-based learning environments is only in its early stages because it adds a very time-consuming step to the design process. Basically, assessment for game-based learning is distinguished between game scoring, external, and embedded assessment. Strength and weaknesses of assessment methodologies are discussed. The chapter concludes that intelligent assessment of game-based learning will be the challenges for the twenty-first century instructional designers and serious games developers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernstein, F. (1998). Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play and games. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J., Dukes, R., & Gamson, W. (2009). Assessment in simulation and gaming: A review of the last 40 years. Simulation and Gaming, 40(4), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, G. K. W. K., & Baker, E. L. (2003). An exploratory study to examine the feasibility of measuring problem-solving processes using a click-through interface. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2(2), Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.jtla.org.

  • Dirx, R. (1981). Das Buch vom Spiel. Das Spiel einst und jetzt. Gelnhausen: Burckhardthaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. [Lohhausen. On dealing with uncertainity and complexity]. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummer, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2005). Planning and assessing navigation in model-centered learning environments. Why learners often do not follow the path laid out for them. In G. Chiazzese, M. Allegra, A. Chifari, & S. Ottaviano (Eds.), Methods and technologies for learning (pp. 327–334). Southhampton, UK: WIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2011). Alternative assessment strategies for complex ­problem solving in game-based learning environments. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Kinshuk, D. Isaias, G. Sampson, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age (pp. 159–178). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Federation of American Scientists. (2005). Summit of educational games: Harnessing the power of video games for learning. Washington, DC: Federation of American Scientists

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, J. (2004). Game-based learning: How to delight and instruct in the 21st century. Educause Review, 39(5), 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920). Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 20). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galarneau, L., & Zibit, M. (2007). Online games for 21st century skills. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 59–88). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguin, S. (2010). Computerspiele und lebenslanges Lernen. Eine Synthese von Gegensätzen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2008). Practical solutions for the diagnosis of progressing mental models. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Understanding models for learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Norbert M. Seel (pp. 43–61). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2009a). Model-based feedback for improving expertise and expert performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 7(2), 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2009b). Using a causal model for the design and development of a simulation game for teacher education. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 6(3), 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Bridging the gap between expert-novice differences: The model-based ­feedback approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2011). Intelligent model-based feedback. Helping students to monitor their ­individual learning progress. In S. Graf, F. Lin, Kinshuk, & R. McGreal (Eds.), Intelligent and adaptive systems: Technology enhanced support for learners and teachers (pp. 88–100). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Mental models. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive ­science (pp. 469–499). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1803). Über Pädagogik. Königsberg: Friedrich Theodor Rink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, D. C. (2006). Designing online games assessment as “Information Trails”. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulation in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 323–348). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Foster, A. (2007). The claims of games: A comprehensive review and directions for future research. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. San Antonio, TX: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S.-H., & Chung, G. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(3), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmentier, M. (2004). Spiel. In D. Benner & J. Oelkers (Eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Pädagogik (pp. 929–945). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing what students know. The secience and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1975). Nachahmung, Spiel und Traum. Die Entwicklung der Symbolfunktion beim Kinde. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, D. D., & Tabachnick, B. G. (2010). The moment of learning: Quantitative analysis of exemplar gameplay supports CyGaMEs approach to embedded assessment. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, R., & Williamson, B. (2005). Games and learning: A handbook from futurelab. Bristol, UK: Futurelab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerl, H. (1988). Zwanglose Selbstbildung im Spiel. Entwicklungsförderung im Spiel? Spielmittel, 2(88), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., & McCreery, M. (2008). The acquisition of skill and expertise in massively multiplayer online games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 557–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J., & Spector, J. M. (2010). Stealth assessment in virtual worlds. Retrieved November 27, 2011, from http://www.adlnet.gov/Technologies/Evaluation/Library/AdditionalResources/LETSIWhitePapers/Shute-StealthAssessmentinVirtualWorlds.pdf.

  • Spector, J. M., & Koszalka, T. A. (2004). The DEEP methodology for assessing learning in ­complex domains (final report to the National Science Foundation Evaluative Research and Evaluation Capacity Building). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W., & Wagner, S. U. (1985). Presenting questions, processing responses, and providing feedback in CAI. Journal of Instructional Development, 8(4), 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. (2002). Video game violence and public policy. Retrieved October 27, 2011, from http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/videogames2.pdf.

  • Willett, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. Review of Research in Education, 15, 345–422.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Ifenthaler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., Ge, X. (2012). Assessment for Game-Based Learning. In: Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., Ge, X. (eds) Assessment in Game-Based Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics