Skip to main content

Social Capital Influences upon Internet Usage of Rural Guatemalan English Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Media and Technology Yearbook

Part of the book series: Educational Media and Technology Yearbook ((EMTY,volume 37))

Abstract

This qualitative study examined the influence of social capital upon Internet usage by Guatemalan English teachers in the rural, indigenous community of San Lucas Toliman. The purpose was to improve enrollment and persistence in online teacher professional development programs supported by the Fundación Rigoberta Menchú Tum. Woolcock’s concepts of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital were united with Rogers’ theory of perceived attributes to ascertain why only a few teachers had completed free online coursework. The research questions addressed teacher concerns about using the Internet, teacher satisfaction with Internet resources, and social influences upon Internet usage.

The participatory rural appraisal (PRA) method was employed. A culturally sensitive native speaker interviewed a purposive sample of teachers. In accordance with PRA analysis procedures, representative interview statements were sorted, prioritized, and discussed by a team of community educators to generate findings. Findings indicated that interest in engaging through the Internet and receiving specialized introductory support (bridging social capital) in groups (bonding social capital) was high. Findings also indicated that salary level (linking social capital) and family time demands (bonding social capital) were barriers to attending a community technology center or Internet café. Findings reinforced the community’s support for the design of online coursework leading to salary points and college credits. This study demonstrates how organizations can promote community-driven research collaborations to facilitate teachers’ Internet usage in remote sectors of the developing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsop, R., Chase, R., & Owen, D. (2003). Social capital, empowerment, and community driven development: Presentation notes. PSIA Sourcebook. World Bank: Geneva. Retrieved at http://info.worldbank.org/etools/bspan/PresentationView.asp?PID=936&EID=482=936&EID=482

  • Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batane, T. (2004). Inservice teacher training and technology: A case of Botswana. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 387–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniz, E. (2006) Evaluation of technological needs and resources at five middle schools in Totonicapán, Guatemala. CLASPO Report: Summer 2006. Austin: Center for Latin American Social Policy at the University of Texas. Retrieved at www.utexas.edu/cola/insts/llilas/claspo/research/noformat/claspo/PDF/field%20reports/tzoc%2006.pdf.

  • Chambers, R. (1990). Rapid but relaxed and participatory rural appraisal: Towards applications in health and nutrition. Retrieved at www.unu.edu/unupress/food2/UIN08E/uin08e%200u.htm

  • Chambers, R. (1992). Rural Appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed, and Participatory. Institute of Development Studies Discussion Paper 311. Sussex: HELP. Retrieved at www.worldbank.org/wbi/sourcebook/sba%20104.htm

  • Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal: Challenges, potential, paradigms. World Development, 22(10), 1437–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1998). Beyond “Whose reality counts?” New methods we now need? Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 4, 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. (2004). Transborder tourism, borderless classroom: Reflections on a Hawaii—Singapore experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(2), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes, W. (2007). Online chat with the Assistant Education Director of the Fundación Rigoberta Menchú Tum by Douglas Tedford. December, 6, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl), S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conciliation Resources. (2007). Agreement on social and economic aspects and agrarian situation: 1996, Mexico City. Conciliation Resources, website. Retrieved at http://www.c-r.org/our-work/accord/guatemala/socio-economic-accord.php.

  • Creed, C. & Joynes, C. (2005). Education for all global monitoring report: Improving the quality of primary school through distance education. Study undertaken by IRFOL: Distance Learning and Improving the Quality of Education Report. International Research Foundation for Open Learning for the EFA Monitoring Team. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, B. & McIlroy, A. (2003). The digital divide: Why the don’t-want-to’s won’t compute —Lessons from a New Zealand ICT project. First Monday, Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet 8(12). Retrieved at http://www.firstMonday.org/issues/issue8_12/crump/#c6.

  • DiMaggio, P. & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Sociology Department, Princeton University. Princeton, NJ. Retrieved at http://www.princeton.edu/∼arts%20pol/workpap/WP15%20-%20DiMaggio%2BHargittai.pdf.

  • Dudwick, N., Kuehnast, K., Nyhan Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Analyzing social capital in context: a guide to using qualitative methods and data. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute. Retrieved at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/Analyzing_%20Social_Capital_in_Context-FINAL.pdf.

  • Durston, J. (2002). El capital social campesino en la gestión del desarrollo rural: Diadas, equipos, puentes y escaleras. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL: Comisión Económica para America Latina y el Caribe. Retrieved at http://www.eclac.org/publicaciones/xml/0/11700/Capitulo_III.pdf.

  • Fazio, M. (2007, February). Economic opportunities for indigenous peoples in Latin America: Guatemala, Conference Edition, February 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXT%20EDUCATION/0,content%20MDK:21185632∼menuPK:%20282391∼pagePK:64020865∼piPK:51164185∼theSitePK:2823%2086,00.html.

  • Foth, M. (2003, December 15–17). Connectivity does not insure community: on social capital, networks, and communities of place. The International conference on information technology in regional areas, Caloundra, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved at http://www.mobilecommunitydesign.com/research/Foth-Connectivity_does_not_ensure_community-on_social_capital_networks_and_communities_of_place.pdf.

  • Galvez, O. (2007). Telephone interview, September 20, 2007, between Douglas Tedford and Osbaldo Galvez, chief administrator of the Centro Educativo Luciano Pavarotti. Guatemala: San Lucas Toliman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves, J. (2005). Participatory research and development for sustainable agriculture and natural resource management: A sourcebook. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. E., Gottstein, J. B., & Goodman, D. S. (2001). International perspectives: wiring the wilderness in Alaska and the Yukon. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 44(6), 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, L. (1998). Working with indigenous knowledge: a guide for researchers. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, E. (2003). ‘I click,therefore I am (not)’: is cognition ‘distributed’ or is it ‘contained’ in borderless e-learning programmes? International Journal of Training and Development 7(4), 303–317. Retrieved at EBSCO Host database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez, A., Linder, K., & Woolcock, M. (2002). Social capital in Guatemala: A mixed methods analysis. Guatemala Poverty Assessment Program, Technical Paper No. 12. Geneva: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD/World Bank). (2006). Social capital, empowerment, and community driven development, description. Retrieved at http://info.worldbank.org/etools/vod/PresentationView.asp?PID=936&EID=482

  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD/World Bank). (2007a). Social capital and information technology. Retrieved at http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/poverty/scapital/topic/info1.htm

  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD/World Bank). (2007b). World Bank Participatory Sourcebook, Appendix 1: Methods and Tools. Retrieved at http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/sourcebook/sba104.htm.

  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD/World Bank). (2008). PovertyNet: Information and Communication Technology. Retrieved at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTEMPOWERMENT/0contentMDK:20265884∼menuPK:543261∼pagePK:148956∼piPK:2166∼theSitePK:486411,00.html

  • ITFORCEGT. (2006). India—Guatemala IT Education Centre of Excellence. Retrieved at http://www.itforcegt.org/

  • Kavanaugh, A., Reese, D., Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. The Information Society, 21, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, F. (2001). Children falling into the digital divide. Journal of International Affairs, 55(1), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laungani, P. (2005). Building multicultural counseling bridges: The holy grail or a poisoned chalice? Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 18(4), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavey, T. (2003). The Internet remains a mystery to most people. UN Chronicle, 4(34), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzetti, J. (2004). Strategic planning and social capital in distance education: a conversation with Eugene Kowch. Distance Education Report, 8(18), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menchú, P. (2007). Letter re: Douglas Tedford, Fundación Rigoberta Menchú Tum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natriello, G. (2001). Bridging the second digital divide: What can sociologists of education ­contribute? Sociology of Education, 74, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olugebenga Ojo, D., & Kayode Olakulehin, F. (2006). Attitudes and perceptions of students to open and distance learning in Nigeria. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1492–3831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordoñez, A. (2006). India abrira un centro de entratenimiento informatico (India will open an ICT training center). El Periodico: Guatemala. Retrieved September 30, from http://www.itforcegt.org/photos3.php.

  • Randolph, K. A., & Krause, D. J. (2002). Mutual aid in the classroom: An instructional technology application. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2), 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romo-Rodriguez, G. (2005). Information and communication technologies and non-governmental organizations: Lessons learnt from networking in Mexico. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 21(3), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe-Whyte, A., O’Sullivan, P. & Hunt, S. (2002). Immediacy on the web: Narrowing the digital divide. Department of Communication, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois. Retrieved from EBSCO Host Database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J., Gillespie, A. & Richardson, R. (2004, December). The territoriality of pan-European telecommunications backbone networks. Journal of Urban Technology, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F. (2007). Social capital gateway: resources for the study of social capital, website. Retrieved at http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/NV-eng-education.htm.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2008). Latin American and Caribbean ministers approved new plan of action for the information society 11-03-2008 (San Salvador). Communication and Information Resources, website. Retrieved at http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=26186&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.

  • Van Bavel, R., Punie, E. & Tuomi, I. (2007). IPTSICT-enabled changes in social capital, in the IPTS Report. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) of the European Commission, Directorate General, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved at http://www.jrc.es/home/report/english/articles/vol85/ICT4E856.htm.

  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (2002). Social capital and development: concepts, evidence and applications. Power point presentation, Workshop on understanding and building social capital in Croatia, Zagreb, Yugoslavia. World Bank and Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2002). Social capital: Implications for development and theory, research, and policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tedford, D. (2013). Social Capital Influences upon Internet Usage of Rural Guatemalan English Teachers. In: Orey, M., Jones, S., Branch, R. (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, vol 37. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4430-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics