Abstract
In this chapter we discuss how the Internet is interacting with mathematics education. After briefly discussing the rise of the Internet and its impact on education, we suggest that it has the potential to disrupt mathematics teaching and learning. Moving far beyond its used as a data resource, we suggest the Internet will provide on-demand access to mathematics knowledge through the collaborative, multimodal and performative affordances of the media that it supports. We note that such affordances will not come to fruition until pedagogical practices have adapted to the rapid pace of this technological change. We conclude by noting that such fundamental change in the teaching of mathematics does have many obstacles, not least that approximately two-thirds of the world’s population does not have sufficient access to the Internet–– and in societies where access is available, access to the Internet often remains limited in classroom settings, particularly for students in low socio-economic areas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agatston, P. A., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Students’ perspectives on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S59–S60.
Annetta, L. A., Folta, E., & Klesath, M. (2010). V-Learning: Distance education in the 21st century through 3D virtual learning environments. New York, NY: Springer.
Arzarello, F., & Edwards, L. (2005). Research forum PME 29: Gesture and the construction of mathematical meaning. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 123–154). Melbourne, Australia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Arzarello, F., Olivera, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practices in Cabri environments. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 34(3), 66–72. doi:10.1007/BF02655708.
Atweh, B., & Clarkson, P. C. (2001). Internationalisation and globalisation of mathematics education: Towards an agenda for research action. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 77–94). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Atweh, B., Clarkson, P., & Nebres, B. (2003). Mathematics education in international and global contexts. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 185–232). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Beatty, R., & Geiger, V. (2010). Technology, communication and collaboration: Re-thinking communities of inquiry, learning and practice. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain (pp. 251–284). New York, NY: Springer.
Boal, A. (1985). Theatre of the oppressed. New York, NY: Theater Communications Group.
Boorstin, J. (1990). The Hollywood eye. What makes movies work. New York, NY: Cornelia & Michael Bessie Books.
Borba, M. C. (2009). Potential scenarios for Internet use in the mathematics classroom. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41(4), 453–465. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0188-2.
Borba, M. C., & Gadanidis, G. (2008). Virtual communities and networks of practicing mathematics teachers: The role of technology in collaboration. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities, and networks (Vol. 3, pp. 181–209). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2008). Online mathematics education. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorrw, & A. Mep lveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 32 and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 1, p. 191). Morelia, Mexico: Cinvestav-UMSWH.
Borba, M. C., Llinares, S., Clay, E., & Silverman, J. (2010). Online mathematics teacher education. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 396–396). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: International Group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education.
Borba, M. C., Malheiros, A. P. S., & Zulatto, R. B. A. (2010). Online distance education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation, and visualization. New York, NY: Springer.
Borba, M. C., & Zulatto, R. A. (2010). Dialogical education and learning mathematics online from teachers. In R. Leikin & R. Zaskis (Eds.), Learning through teaching mathematics: Developing mathematics teachers’ knowledge and expertise in practice (Vol. 5, pp. 111–125). New York, NY: Springer.
Cakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 155–190.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cazes, C., Gueudet, G., Hersant, M., & Vandebrouck, F. (2006). Using e-exercise bases in mathematics: Case studies at university. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(3), 327–350.
Charles, E. S., & Shumar, W. (2009). Student and team agency in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 207–224). New York, NY: Springer.
Chinnappan, M. (2006). Using the productive pedagogies framework to build a community of learners online in mathematics education. Distance Education, 27(3), 355–369.
Churchhouse, R. F. (1986). The influence of computers and informatics on mathematics and its teaching. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clarkson, P. C. (1980). In-service training and curriculum. Com-3, 21, 31–33.
Clarkson, P. C. (2011). Thinking back: Becoming aware of the global and its impact on choice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 153–163.
Clarkson, P. C. (in press). Using interactive whiteboards in school settings: A resource for future pedagogies. In J. Zajda (Ed.), International handbook on globalisation, education and policy research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Clarkson, P. C., & Toomey, R. (2001, December). Teachers not using computers to teach mathematics. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association of Research for Education. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/index.htm.
DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and Internet use by students in 2003 (NCES 2006–065). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), article 1. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html.
Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 235–252.
Ernest, P. (1996). Popularization: Myths, mass media and modernism. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 785–817). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Ferrara, F., Pratt, D., & Robutti, O. (2006). The role and uses of technologies for the teaching of algebra and calculus: Ideas discussed at PME over the last 30 years. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 237–273). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Gadanidis, G. (2007). Designing an online learning platform from scratch. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 1642–1647). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Gadanidis, G. (2010). Digital Windows into elementary mathematics: Performing images of mathematicians using new media tools. In J. Herrington & B. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010 (pp. 2701–2708). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Gadanidis, G., & Borba, M. C. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 42–49.
Gadanidis, G., Borba, M. C., Hughes, J., & Scucuglia, R. (2010). “Tell me a good mathstory”: Digital mathematical performance, drama, songs, and cell phones in the math classroom. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 17–24). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Gadanidis, G., & Geiger, V. (2010). A social perspective on technology enhanced mathematical learning—from collaboration to performance. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 91–104.
Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J., & Borba, M. C. (2008). Students as performance mathematicians. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 168–175.
Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J., & Cordy, M. (2011). Mathematics for gifted students in an arts- and technology-rich setting. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(3), 397–433.
Gadanidis, G., Jardine, R., & Sedig, K. (2007). Designing Digital Windows into Mathematics. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 3532–3537). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Gadanidis, G., & Scucuglia, R. (2010). Windows into elementary mathematics: Alternate mathematics images of mathematics and mathematicians [Janelas para Matemática Elementar: imagens públicas alternativas de matemáticae matemáticos]. Acta Scientiae, 12(1), 24–42.
Gadanidis, G., Sedig, K., & Liang, H. N. (2004). Designing online mathematical investigation. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(3), 273–296.
Gerber, S., Shuell, T. J., & Harlos, C. A. (1998). Using the Internet to learn mathematics. Journal of Computers Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17(2–3), 113–132.
Guberman-Glebov, R., Baruch, R., & Barabash, M. (2003). Decision-making in construction of courses combining classroom-based and Internet-based learning and teaching strategies in mathematics teachers’ education. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 147–163.
Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. (2010). How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. Mendeley Computer and Information Science, 15(3), 1–9.
Herrera, T. A. (2001). A valid role for the Internet in the mathematics classroom. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 57(1), 24–27.
Horstman, T., & Kerr, S. (2010). An analysis of design strategies for creating educational experiences in virtual environments. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning. Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 183–206). New York, NY: Springer.
Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., Trouche, L., Hivon, L., Noss, R., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Connectivity and virtual networks for learning. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematical education and digital technologies: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 439–462). New York, NY: Springer.
Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J.-B. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain. The 17th ICMI Study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Hughes, J. (2008). The “screen-size” art: Using digital media to perform poetry. English in Education, 42(2), 148–164.
Idris, Y., & Wang, Q. (2009). Affordances of Facebook for learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 19(2–3), 247–255.
Ilavarasan, P., & Levy, M. (2010). ICTs and urban microenterprises: Identifying and maximizing opportunities for economic development. New Delhi, India: Canada’s International Development Research Centre. Internet World Stats (2010). Miniwatts Marketing Group.
Internet World Stats. (2011). Internet world stats: Usage and population statistics. Retrieved from www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
Khine, M. S., & Salleh, I. M. (2010). New science of learning: Exploring the future of education. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning. Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 593–604). New York, NY: Springer.
Kieran, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Working group on technological environments. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (Eds.). (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Kotsopoulos, D. (2010). When collaborative is not collaborative: Supporting peer learning through self-surveillance. International Journal of Educational Research, 49, 129–140.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold.
Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strasser, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 275–304). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2008).
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
Lerman, S. (2000). The socio-cultural turn in studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. In H. Fujita, Y. Hashimoto, B. Hodgson, P. Y. Lee, S. Lerman, & T. Sawada (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress on mathematical education (pp. 157–158). Tokyo, Japan: Kluwer.
Lévy, P. (1993). Tecnologias da inteligência: O futuro do pensamento na era da informática. [Technologies of Intelligence: the future of thinking in the informatics era]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Editora 34.
Lévy, P. (1998). Becoming virtual: Reality in the digital age. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Lévy, P. (2001). Cyberculture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Lin, F. L., & Ponte, J. P. (2008). Face-to-face learning communities of prospective mathematics teachers: Studies on their professional growth. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 111–129). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Loong, E., & White, B. (2003). Teaching mathematics using the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RR_loongwhi.pdf.
Maltempi, M. V., & Malheiros, A. P. S. (2010). Online distance mathematics education in Brazil: Research, practice and policy. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 42(3–4), 291–304. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0231-3.
Mariotti, M. A. (2002). Influence of technologies advances on students’ math learning. In L. D. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. A. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 695–723). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marrades, R., & Gutierrez, A. (2000). Proof produced by secondary school students learning geometry in dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 87–125. doi:10.1023/A:1012785106627.
Martinovic, D. (2005). What are the characteristics of asynchronous online mathematics help environments and do they provide conditions for learning? In R. Luckin & S. Puntambeker (Eds.), Proceedings from the 12th International Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Representing and analyzing collaborative interactions: What works? When does it work? To what extent are methods re-usable? (pp. 32–39). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: AIED. Retrieved from http://hcs.science.uva.nl/AIED2005/W6proc.pdf.
Nanyang Technological University. (2010). Student IT background survey: Usage of Internet communication and Web 2.0. Centre for IT Services (CITS), Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) and NIE Computer Services Centre (CSC). Retrieved from http://enewsletter.ntu.edu.sg/itconnect/2010-04/Pages/Survey2009-InternetCollaboration.aspx.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Picker, S., & Berry, J. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94.
Pineau, E. L. (2005). Teaching is performance: Reconceptualizing a problematic metaphor. In B. K. Alexander, G. L. Anderson, & B. P. Gallegos (Eds.), Performance theories in education: Power, pedagogy, and the politics of identity (pp. 15–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pinto, M. M. F., & Kawasaki, T. F. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: International Group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education.
Pritchard, C., & Wilson, G. (1999). Sources of data on the Internet. Mathematics in School, 28(1), 44–46.
Santos, S. C. (2006). A produção matemática em uma ambiente virtual de aprendizagem: o caso da geometria euclidiana especial. [Mathematical production in a learning virtual environment: the case of Spatial Euclidian Geometry] (Master’s thesis). Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Brazil.
Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2009). Group creativity in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 225–235). New York, NY: Springer.
Schrage, M. (2001). The relationship revolution. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20030602025739/, http://www.ml.com/woml/forum/relation.htm.
Selwyn, N. (2007). “Screw blackboard … do it on Facebook!”: An investigation of students’ educational use of Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/513958/Facebookseminar-paper-Selwyn.
Sinclair, N. (2001). The aesthetic is relevant. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(1), 25–32.
Sinclair, N., Pimm, D., & Higginson, W. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics and the aesthetic: Modern approaches to an ancient affinity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
Stahl, G. (2009a). A chat about Chat. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 7–16). New York, NY: Springer.
Stahl, G. (2009b). The VMT vision. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 17–29). New York, NY: Springer.
Tay, K., Tan, D., & Tan, M. (2009). Using Facebook as a multi-functional online tool for collaborative and engaged learning of pre-university subjects. In M. Kim, S. Hwang, & A.-L. Tan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Science Education Conference 2009 [CD-ROM] (pp. 2082–2107). Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Upitis, R., Phillips, E., & Higginson, W. (1997). Creative mathematics: Exploring children’s understanding. London, UK: Routledge.
Wadsworth, L. M., Husman, J., Duggan, M. A., & Pennington, M. N. (2007). Online mathematics achievement: Effects of learning strategies and self-efficacy. Journal of Developmental Education. 30(3), 6–8, 10, 12–14.
Waters, M. (1995). Globalization. London, UK: Routledge.
Weigel, M., Straughn, C., & Gardner, H. (2010). New digital media and their potential cognitive impact on youth learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Springer.
Zevenbergen, R., & Lerman, S. (2008). Learning environments using interactive whiteboards: New learning spaces or reproduction of old technologies? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 107–125.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our reviewers and editors for their comments in earlier versions of this chapter. We would also like to thank Ricardo Scucuglia Rodrigues da Silva (Western University) for his comments on earlier versions of this chapter and for helping us with the literature review. We would also acknowledge suggestions given by members of the Brazil-based research group GPIMEM: Marcus Maltempi, Silvana Santos, Felipe Heitmann, Fernando Trevisan, Nilton Domingues and Debora Soares—all of whom read at least one of the draft versions of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borba, M.C., Clarkson, P., Gadanidis, G. (2012). Learning with the Use of the Internet. In: Clements, M., Bishop, A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F. (eds) Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 27. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4683-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4684-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)