Skip to main content

Post-procedural Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Flexible endoscopy, when performed in an appropriate environment with well-defined institutional standards of care, is considered a safe and well-tolerated diagnostic and therapeutic tool. The facility must be approved to perform flexible endoscopy, carried out by qualified endoscopists. This chapter describes how patients should be managed in the post-procedure recovery unit with an emphasis on early recognition of potential complications based on the patient’s risk factors (determined during preoperative evaluation), type of procedure performed and anaesthetic technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Waye JD, Rex DK, Williams CB. Colonoscopy: principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME. Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996;6(2):343–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cobb WS, Heniford BT, Sigmon LB, Hasan R, Simms C, Kercher KW, et al. Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes. Am Surg. 2004;70(9):750–7. discussion 757–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lüning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB, Tan AC, Rosman C. Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(6):994–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts-Thomson IC, Teo E. Colonoscopy: art or science? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(2):180–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, Brill JV, Inadomi JM, Kochman ML, et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(2):675–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salminen P, Laine S, Gullichsen R. Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(9):1965–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, et al. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(7):784–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gedebou TM, Wong RA, Rappaport WD. Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations. Am J Surg. 1996;172:454–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams CB, Teague RH. Colonoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg. 1973;14:990–1003.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(1):80–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lichtenstein G. Bowel preparations for colonoscopy: a review. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(1):27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, Anderson MA, Banerjee S, et al. Sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. J Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(5):815–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mertes PM, Maxenaire MC. Allergy and anaphylaxis in anaesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004;70(5):285–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirota WK, Peterson K, Baron TH. Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:475–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Allison MC, Sandoe JA, Tighe R, Simpson IA, Hall RJ, Elliott TS, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 2009;58(6):869–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wewalka F, Kapral C, Brownstone E, Homoncik M, Renner F, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. [Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy–recommendations of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology]. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48(10):1225–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zubarik R, Fleischer DE, Mastropietro C, Lopez J, Carroll J, Benjamin S, et al. Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(3):322–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hart R, Classen M. Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 1990;22(5):229–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silvis SE, Nebel O, Rogers G, Sugawa C, Mandelstam P. Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey. JAMA. 1976;235(9):928–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Constans M, Santamaria A, Mateo J, Pujol N, Souto JC, Fontcuberta J. Low-molecular-weight heparin as bridging therapy during interruption of oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing colonoscopy or gastroscopy. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61(2):212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HS, Kim TI, Kim WH, Kim YH, Kim HJ, Yang SK, et al. Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(6):1333–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ko CW, Riffle S, Michaels L, Morris C, Holub J, Shapiro JA, et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(2):166–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pettersson G, Larsson S, Gatzinsky P, Südow G. Differentiated treatment of intrathoracic oesophageal perforations. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;15:321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lohsiriwat V, Sujarittanakarn S, Akaraviputh T, Lertakyamanee N, Lohsiriwat D, Kachinthorn U. Colonoscopic perforation: a report from World Gastroenterology Organization endoscopy training center in Thailand. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(43):6722–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garbay JR, Suc B, Rotman N, Fourtanier G, Escat J. Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy. Br J Surg. 1996;83(1):42–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Orsoni P, Berdah S, Verrier C, Caamano A, Sastre B, Boutboul R, et al. Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Endoscopy. 1997;29(3):160–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clements RH, Jordan LM, Webb WA. Critical decisions in the management of endoscopic perforations of the colon. Am Surg. 2000;66(1):91–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Panteris V, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ. Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41(11):941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010; 20(4):659–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Katon RM. Complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the gastrointestinal bleeder. Dig Dis Sci. 1981;26(7 Suppl):47S–54S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tait IS, Krige JE, Terblanche J. Endoscopic band ligation of oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1999;86(4):437–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schrag SP, Sharma R, Jaik NP, Seamon MJ, Lukaszczyk JJ, Martin ND, et al. Complications related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16(4):407–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Elmunzer BJ, Waljee AK, Elta GH, Taylor JR, Fehmi SM, Higgins PD. A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut. 2008;57(9):1262–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57(6):633–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cartier T, Sogni P, Perruche F, Meyniard O, Claessens YE, Dhainaut JF, et al. Normal lipase serum level in acute pancreatitis: a case report. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(9):701–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehrdad Nikfarjam M.D., Ph.D., F.R.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hadj, A.K., Nikfarjam, M. (2013). Post-procedural Considerations. In: Marks, J., Dunkin, B. (eds) Principles of Flexible Endoscopy for Surgeons. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6330-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6330-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6329-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6330-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics