Skip to main content

Prosthetic Vision, Assessment

Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

Synonyms

Functional vision; Ultralow vision assessment; Visual function

Definition

As early-generation visual prostheses offer only modest increases in visual acuity, it is vital that a thorough assessment of pre- and postoperative function is completed. Assessment of prosthetic vision is multimodal and requires both clinical measures (visual acuity, visual fields) and functional vision measures (orientation and mobility, activities of daily living).

Detailed Definition

Assessment of prosthetic vision is challenging, as prosthesis recipients have very poor preoperative vision (less than 20/4000, or logMAR 2.3), and in early-generation devices, the improvements in vision are small. The majority of recipients of these early-generation prosthetic devices have a condition called retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and it is common for their visual performance to fluctuate significantly in differing light conditions. Due to these factors, a detailed and multimodal assessment of prosthetic vision is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bach M (1996) The Freiburg visual acuity test–automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73(1):49–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bach M, Wilke M, Wilhelm B, Zrenner E, Wilke R (2010) Basic quantitative assessment of visual performance in patients with very low vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(2):1255–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey IL, Jackson AJ, Minto H, Greer RB, Chu MA (2012) The Berkeley rudimentary vision test. Optom Vis Sci 89(9):1257–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner AK, Iftikhar MH, Dagnelie G (2011) Test-retest, within-visit variability of goldmann visual fields in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(11):8042–8046

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humayun MS, Dorn JD, da Cruz L, Dagnelie G, Sahel JA, Stanga PE, Cideciyan AV, Duncan JL, Eliott D, Filley E, Ho AC, Santos A, Safran AB, Arditi A, Del Priore LV, Greenberg RJ (2012) Interim results from the international trial of second sight’s visual prosthesis. Ophthalmology 119(4):779–788

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Dagnelie G (2011) Visual prosthetics: physiology, bioengineering, rehabilitation. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-1-4419-0753-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Chader G, Greenbaum E (2007) Artificial sight: basic research, biomedical engineering and clinical advances. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-0-387-49329-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tombran-Tink J, Barnstable CJ, Rizzo JF (2007) Visual prosthesis and ophthalmic devices: new hope in sight. Springer, New York. ISBN 978-1-934115-16-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Ayton Ph.D., BOptom, GCOT, FACO .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ayton, L. (2014). Prosthetic Vision, Assessment. In: Jaeger, D., Jung, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_656-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_656-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7320-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Prosthetic Vision, Assessment
    Published:
    03 September 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_656-2

  2. Original

    Prosthetic Vision, Assessment
    Published:
    23 March 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_656-1