Skip to main content

Auctions of Last Resort in Telecom and Energy Regulatory Restructuring

  • Chapter
Markets, Pricing, and Deregulation of Utilities

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 40))

  • 129 Accesses

Abstract

Regulatory and market structure for services in both the telecommunications and energy sectors has undergone a very significant transformation over the past several years. The starting point in both sectors was a vertically integrated monopoly provider of all services in each region. In both, under regulatory mandate, there has been divestiture of different forms, the advent of competition and in many, if not most, states, the same regulatory agencies have had jurisdiction. These regulatory agencies, as well as legislatures at both the State and Federal levels have stopped short of exposing end users to unregulated rates. The challenge facing regulators at both the State and Federal levels, and in both the telecommunications and energy sectors, has been to ensure consumers can continue to receive basic service needs at rates deemed affordable. This necessarily means sheltering consumers somewhat from market fluctuations during a deregulatory process under which incumbent regulated entities, incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), or local electric distribution companies (LDCs) are increasingly being put in a position of competition with unregulated entities. A last resort in deregulation has been auction to ensure competitive procurement of the basic services.

This paper has benefited enormously from two projects. The first was a collaborative research effort funded by the GTE Corporation, which also involved contributions of Paul Milgrom, Stanford University and Valter Sorana, University of Tilburg, Padmanabhan Srinagesh, Charles River Associates, and Dennis Weller of GTE. The second was funded by PSE&G and included contributions of Sam Dinkin of Alkera, Inc, Chantale LaCasse of NERA, Colin Loxley of PSE&G and Paul Milgrom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Borenstein, Severin, James Bushnell, Christopher R. Knittel, and Catherine Wolfram. 2001. “Trading Inefficiencies in California’s Electricity Markets (NBER Working Paper No. w8620, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, Peter. 1995. “Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 63: 431–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, Peter, Andrew Parece, and Robert Wilson. 1997. “Auction Design for Standard Offer Services,” Working Paper University of Maryland, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybernomics. 1999. “An Experimental Analysis of the FCC’s Eligibility Rules,” November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybernomics. 2000a. “An Experimental Comparison of the Simultaneous Multi-Round Auction and the CRA Combinatorial Auction,” March

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybernomics. 2000b. “Theory, Experiment and the FCC Spectrum Auctions,” March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Biennial Review, at http://www.fcc.gov/biennial/Telecommunications Act of 1996 Section 254. Universal Service.

  • Hunt, Sally and Graham Shuttleworth. 1997. Competition and Choice in Electricity. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Sally. 2002. Making Competition Work in Electricity Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul, and Edward Kahn. 2001. “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000.” NBER Working Paper No. w8157 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul, and Edward Kahn. 2002. “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000: The Final Word,” February, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, Paul. 2002. “What Really Matters in Auction Design,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (No. 1, Winter): 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul. 1997. “Procuring Universal Service: Putting Auction Theory to Work.” In he Prix Nobel: The Nobel Prizes, 1996. Nobel Foundation, 382–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul. 2000. “Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction.” Journal of Political Economy 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, David. 2001.“Tsotone Equilibrium in Multi-Unit Auctions,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salant, David. 1996. “Carrier of Last Resort Sales.” Charles River Associates, Inc., mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salant, David. 2000. “Auctions and Regulation: Reengineering of Regulatory Mechanisms.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17(3): 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver. 1976. “Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies — in General and with Respect to CATV.” The Bell Journal of Economics, Spring 7: 73–104. Reprinted in The Foundations of Regulatory Economics edited by Robert B. Ekelund Jr, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salant, D.J. (2002). Auctions of Last Resort in Telecom and Energy Regulatory Restructuring. In: Crew, M.A., Schuh, J.C. (eds) Markets, Pricing, and Deregulation of Utilities. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 40. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0877-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0877-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5283-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0877-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics