Skip to main content

Possibility Theory, Probability and Fuzzy Sets Misunderstandings, Bridges and Gaps

Misunderstandings, Bridges and Gaps

  • Chapter
Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets

Part of the book series: The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series ((FSHS,volume 7))

Abstract

Possibility theory was coined by L.A. Zadeh in the late seventies as an approach to model flexible restrictions constructed from vague pieces of information, described by means of fuzzy sets. Possibility theory is also a basic non-classical theory of uncertainty, different from but related to probability theory. This chapter discusses the basic elements of the theory: possibility and necessity measures (as well as two other set functions associated with a possibility distribution), the minimal specificity principle which underlies the whole theory, the notions of possibilitic conditioning and possibilistic independence, the combination, and projection of joint possibility distributions, as well as the possibilistic counterparts to integration. The relations and differences between this approach and other uncertainty frameworks, and especially probability theory, are pointed out. The difference between probability theory and fuzzy set theory is thus tentatively clarified. Lastly, decision-theoretic justifications of possibility theory are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agbeko K. (1991). Optimal average, Ann, Univ. Sci. Budapest, Sect Comp., 16, 5–10 (Full version: Report 73/1990, Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akian M., Quadrat J.P. and Viot M. (1994). Bellman processes, Proc. 11th Conf. on Analysis and Optimization of Systems, L.N. in Control and Inf. Sci. n°199, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akian M., Quadrat J.P. and Viot M. (1996). Duality between probability and optimization, Idempotency, (Gunawardena J., ed.), Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Anger B. (1977). Representation of capacities, Math, Annalen, 229, 245–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banon G. (1995). Constructive decomposition of fuzzy measures in terms of possibility and necessity measures, Proc. 6th IFSA World Congress, Sao Paulo, 217–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banon G. and Barrera J. (1993). Decomposition of mappings between complete lattices by mathematical morphology, Signal Processing, 30, 299–327.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett V. (1973). Comparative Statistical Inference, J. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman R.E. and Giertz M. (1973). On the analytic formalism of the theory of fuzzy sets, Information Sciences, 5, 149–157.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman R.E. and Zadeh L.A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science, 17, B141–B164.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D. and Prade H. (1997a), Nonmonotonic reasoning, conditional objects and possibility theory, Artificial Intelligence, 92, 259–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D. and Prade H. (1997b), Possibilistic and standard probabilistic semantics of conditional knowledge, Proc. of the 14th National Conf on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’97), 70–75. Extended version to appear in J. Logic & Comput.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D. and Prade H. (1998). Practical handling of exception-tainted rules and independence information in possibilistic logic, Applied Intelligence, 9, 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett B.M., Hoffman D.D. and Murthy P. (1992). Lebesgue order on probabilities and some applications to perception, J. of Mathematical Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berstein L.S., Bronevitch A.G., Karkishchenko A.N. and Zakharevitch V.G. (1996). Statistical classes and possibilistic models of classifying probability distributions, BUSEFAL, 65, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J.C. (Ed.) (1994). Special issue: Fuzziness v. probability-the n-th round, IEEE Trans, on Fuzzy Systems, 2, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J.G., Dubois D., and Prade H. (Eds.) (1999). Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems. The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series (Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biacino L. and Gerla G. (1992). Generated necessities and possibilities, Int. J. Intelligent Systems, 7, 445–454.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgic T. and Türksen I.B. (1999). Measurement of membership functions: Theoretical and empirical work, Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets (Dubois D. and Prade H. eds,), Kluwer Acad. Pub!., 1999. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockley D.I. (1985). Fuzziness and probability: A discussion of Gaines’ axioms, Civ. Engng Syst., 2, 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon-Meunier B., Dubois D., Godo L. and Prade H. (1999). Fuzzy sets and possibility theory in approximate and plausible reasoning, Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems (Bezdek J.C., Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston, 15–190.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier C. (1994). Modal logics for qualitative possibility theory, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 10, 173–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cayrol M., Farreny H. and Prade H. (1982). Fuzzy pattern matching, Kybernetes, 11, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanas S. and Nowakowski M. (1988). Single value simulation of fuzzy variable. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 25, 43–57.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman P. (1988). Probabilistic versus fuzzy reasoning, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence I (Kanal L. and Lemmer J., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet G. (1953). Theory of capacities, Ann. hist. Fourier (Grenoble), 5, 131–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Civanlar M.R. and Trussell HJ. (1986). Constructing membership functions using statistical data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18, 1–13.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke R. (1990). Experts in Uncertainty, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwiche A. and Pearl J. (1997). On the logic of iterated revision, Artificial Intelligence, 89, 1–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Baets B., De Cooman G. and Kerre E. (1998). The construction of possibility measures from samples on T-semi-partitions, Information Sciences, 106, 3–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Baets B., Tsiporkova E. and Mesiar R. (1999). Conditioning in possibility with strict order norms, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 106, 221–229.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Campos L.M. (1995). Independence relationships in possibility theory and their application to learning belief networks, Mathematical end Statistical Methods in Artificial Intelligence (Delia Riccia R., Kruse R. and Viertl R., Eds.), CISM Courses and Lectures Vol. 363, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Campos L.M., Gebhardt J. and Kruse R. (1995). Axiomatic treatment of possibilistic independence, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (Froidevaux C. and Kohlas J.,, Lecture Notes in AI Vol. 946, Springer Verlag, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Campos L.M. and Huete J.F. (1999), Independence concepts in possibility theory, Part I: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 103, 127–152; Part II: Fuzzy Sets and Systems.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Campos L.M., Lamata M.T. and Moral S. (1990). The concept of conditional fuzzy measure, Int. J. of Intelligent Systems, 5, 237–246.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Cooman G. (1997). Possibility theory — Part I: Measure-and integral-theoretics groundwork; Part II: Conditional possibility; Part III: Possibilistic independence, Int. J. of General Systems, 25(4), 291–371.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Cooman G. and Aeyels D. (1996). On the coherence of supremum preserving upper previsions, Proc. of the 6th Inter. Conf Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU’96), Granada, 1405–1410. Extended version to appear in Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cooman G. and Kerre E. (1996). Possibility and necessity integrals, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 77, 207–229.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Cooman G., Kerre E. and Vanmassenhove F.R. (1992). Possibility theory and integral-theoretic approach, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 46, 287–300.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Cooman G., Ruan D. and Kerre E.E. (Eds.) (1995). Foundations & Applications of Possibility Theory (Proceedings of the FAPT’95, Ghent, Belgium, Dec. 13–15, 1995), World Scientific, Singapore.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti B. (1974). Theory of Probability — A Critical Introductory Treatment — Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti B. (1975). Theory of Probability — A Critical Introductory Treatment — Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De lgado M. and Moral S. (1987). On the concept of possibility-probability consistency, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 21, 311–318.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dellacherie C. (1971). Quelques commentaires sur les prolongements de capacités, Séminaire de Probabilité (1969/70), Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 191, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • De mpster A.P. (1967). Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued-mapping, Ann. Math. Statist, 38, 325–339.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg D. (1994). Non-Additive Measure and Integral, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P. and Tanaka H. (1998). Fuzzy regression analysis, Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations Research and Statistics (Slowinski R., ed.), The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston, 349–387.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drakopoulos J.A. (1995). Probabilities, possibilities and fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 75, 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. (1986). Belief structures, possibility theory and decomposable confidence measures on finite sets, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (Bratislava), 5, 403–416.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier H., Fortemps P. and Prade H. (1997). Leximin optimality and fuzzy set-theoretic operations, Proc. of the 7th World Congress of the Inter, Fuzzy Systems Assoc. (IFSA’97), Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier H. and Prade H. (1994). Propagation and satisfaction of flexible constraints, Fuzzy Sets, Neural Networks and Soft Computing (Yager R.R. and Zadeh L.A., Eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 166–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier H. and Prade H. (1995). Fuzzy constraints in job-shop scheduling, J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, 6, 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier H. and Prade H. (1996a). Refinements of the maximin approach to decision-making in fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 81, 103–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier H; and Prade H. (1996b). Possibility theory in constraint satisfaction problems: Handling priority, preference and uncertainty, Applied Intelligence, 6, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fargier H. and Prade H. (1998). Possibilistic likelihood relations, Proc. of the 7th Inter. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU’98), Paris, 1196–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Farinas del Cerro L., Herzig A. and Prade H. (1994). An ordinal view of independence with application to plausible reasoning, Proc. of the 10th Conf on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (Lopez de Mantaras R. and Poole D., eds.), Seattle, WA, July 29–31, 195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fariñas del Cerro L., Herzig A., and Prade H. (1997). Qualitative relevance and independence: A roadmap, Proc. of the I5h Inter. Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’97), Nagoya, Japan, Aug. 23–29, 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Fodor J.C., Prade H. and Roubens M. (1996). Aggregation of decomposable measures with application to utility theory, Theory and Decision, 41, 59–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Fortemps P. (1999). Computing improved optimal solutions to fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems, Eur. J, Operational Research., 118, 95–126.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Godo L., Prade H. and Zapico A. (1998). Making decision in a qualitative setting: From decision under uncertainty to case-based decision, Proc. of the 6th Inter. Conf on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98) (Cohn A.G., Schubert L. and Shapiro S.C., eds.), Trento, Italy, 594–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Lang J. and Prade H. (1994). Possibilistic logic, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming — Vol. 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning (Gabbay D.M., Hogger C.J., Robinson J.A. and Nute D., eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 439–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Kerre E., Mesiar R. and Prade H. (1999). Fuzzy interval analysis, Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets (Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1999. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Moral S. and Prade H. (1997). A semantics for possibility theory based on likelihoods, J. of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 205, 359–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1980), Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1982a). A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms, Int. J. of General Systems, 8, 43–61.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1982b). A unifying view of comparison indices in a fuzzy set-theoretic framework, Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory — Recent-De velopments (Yager R.R., Ed.), Pergamon Press, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois and Prade H. (1982c). On several representations of an uncertain body of evidence, Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes (Gupta M.M. and Sanchez E., eds,), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1983). Unfair coins and necessity measures: towards a possibilistic interpretation of histograms, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10, 15–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1985a). Evidence measures based on fuzzy information, Automatica, 21, 547–562.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1985b). The mean value of a fuzzy number, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24, 279–300.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1986). Fuzzy sets and statistical data, Europ. J. Operations Research, 25, 345–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1987). Twofold fuzzy sets and rough sets — Some issues in knowledge representation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 23, 3–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988a). Modelling uncertainty and inductive inference, Acta Psychologica, 68, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988b). Possibility Theory, Plenum Press, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988c). Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures, Computational Intelligence, 4, 244–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988d). Weighted fuzzy pattern matching, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28, 313–331.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1989). Fuzzy sets, probability and measurement, Europ. J. of Operations Research, 40, 135–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1990a). Consonant approximations of belief functions, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 4, 419–449.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1990b). Modelling uncertain and vague knowledge in possibility and evidence theories, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4 (Shachter R., et al., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1990c). Aggregation of possibility measures, Multiperson Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Kacprzyk J. and Fedrizzi M., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 55–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1991a). Epistemic entrenchment and possibilistic logic, Artificial Intelligence, 50, 223–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1991b). Updating with belief functions, ordinal conditional functions and possibility measures, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6 (Bonissone P.P., Henrion M., Kanal L.N. Lemmer J.F., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992a). Fuzzy rules in knowledge-based systems — Modelling gradedness, uncertainty and preference, An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems (Yager R.R., and Zadeh L.A., Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 45–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992b). When upper probabilities are possibility measures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49, 65–74

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992c). Possibilistic abduction, IPMU’92-Advanced Methods in Artificial Intelligence (Bouchon-Meunier B. et al., eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 682, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992d). Belief change and possibility theory, Belief Revision (Gärdenfors P., ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1992, 142–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1993). Fuzzy sets and probability: Misunderstandings, bridges and gaps, Proc. of the 2nd IEEE Inter. Conf on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE’93), San Francisco, CA, March 28-April 1st, 1059–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1994). Possibility theory and data fusion in poorly informed environments, Control Engineering Practice, 2(5), 811–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1995). Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory, Proc. of the 14th Inter Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’95), Montréal, Canada, 1924–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1996). Focusing vs. revision in possibility theory. In Proc. of the 5th IEEE Inter. Conf on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE’96), New Orleans, LO, Sept. 8–11, 1700–1705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1997a). Bayesian conditioning in possibility theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92, 223–240.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1997b). A synthetic view of belief revision with uncertain inputs in the framework of possibility theory, Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning, 17(2/3), 295–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1998). Possibility theory: Qualitative and quantitative aspects, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems — Vol. I (Gabbay D.M. and Smets P., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 169–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1998c). Belief change rules in ordinal and numerical uncertainty theories, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems — Vol. 3: Belief Change (Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 311–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1999). An overview of ordinal and numerical approaches to causal diagnostic problem solving, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems — Vol. 4: Abduction and Diagnosis (Gebhardt J. and Kruse R., eds.), Kluwer Academic PubL, Dordrecht, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Sabbadin R. (1998). Qualitative decision theory with Sugeno integrals, Proc. of the 14th Conf on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (Cooper G.F. and Moral S., eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Sandri S.A. (1993). On possibility/probability transformations, Fuzzy Logic: State of the Art (Lowen R., Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Smets P. (1996). Representing partial ignorance, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 26, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Yager R.R. (Eds.) (1993). Readings in Fuzzy Sets and Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Yager R.R. (1999). Merging fuzzy information, Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems (Bezdek J.C., Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic PubL, Boston, 335–401.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Yager R.R. (1992). Fuzzy set connectives as combinations of belief structures, Information Sciences, 66, 245–275.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duda R., Gaschnig J. and Hart P. (1981). Model design in the Prospector consultant system for mineral exploration, Expert Systems in the Micro-Electronics Age (Michie D., ed.), Edinburgh University Press, 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W. F. (1972). Likelihood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin R. and Halpern J.Y. (1989). A new approach to updating beliefs, Research Report RJ 7222, IBM, Research Division, San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fariñas del Cerro L. and Herzig A. (1991). A modal analysis of possibility theory, Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence Research (FAIRf91) (Jorrand Ph. and Kelemen J., Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Vol. 535, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fariñas del Cerro L., Herzig A. and Lang J. (1994). From ordering-based nonmonotonic reasoning to conditional logics, Artificial Intelligence, 66, 375–393.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fine T. L. (1973). Theories of Probability, Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P.C. (1986). The axioms of subjective probability, Statistical Science, 1, 335–358.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. and Yager R.R. (1999). Fuzzy set-theoretic operators and quantifiers, Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets (Dubois D, and Prade H., eds.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1999. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonck P. (1997). A comparative study of possibilistic conditional independence and lack of interaction, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 16, 149–172.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fortemps P. (1997). Fuzzy sets for Modelling and Handling Imprecision and Flexibility, Ph. D. Thesis, Faculté Polytechnique de Mons, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortet R. and Kambouzia M. (1976). Ensembles aléatoires et ensembles flous, Publications Econométriques, IX, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • French S. (1984), Fuzzy decision analysis: some criticisms, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 20, 29–44

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garbolino P. (1989). On the plausibility of inverse possibility, Discussion paper 8, Ann. Univ. Ferrara, III (Philosophy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines B.R. (1978). Fuzzy and probability uncertainty logics, Information and Control 38, 154–169.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P. (1988). Knowledge in Flux — Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt J., Gil M.A. and Kruse R. (1998). Fuzzy set-theoretic methods in statistics, Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations Research and Statistics (Slowinski R., ed.), The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston, 311–347.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt J. and Kruse R. (1993). The context model-an intergating view of vagueness and uncertainty. Int J. Approximate Reasoning, 9, 283–314.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt J. and Kruse R. (1994a). A new approach to semantic aspects of possibilistic reasoning, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (Clarke M. et al, Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences Vol. 747, Springer Verlag, 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt J. and Kruse R. (1994b). On an information compression view of possibility theory, Proc 3rd IEEE Int. Conference on Fuzzy Systems. Orlando, F1, 1285–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt JL and Kruse R. (1996). Automated construction of possibilistic networks from data, Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 6, 529–564.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Geer J.F., and Klir GJ. (1992). A mathematical analysis of information-preserving transformations between probabilistic and possibilistic formulations of uncertainty, Int. J. of General Systems, 20, 143–176.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gil M.A. (1988). On the loss of information due to fuzziness in experimental observations, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 4, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles R. (1982). Foundations for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes (Gupta M.M. and Sanchez E., eds.), North-Holland, 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godai R.C. and Goodman TJ. (1980). Fuzzy sets and Borel, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 10, 637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman I.R. (1982), Fuzzy sets as equivalence classes of random sets, Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Yager R.R., Ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman I.R., Nguyen H.T. and Rogers G.S. (1991). On the scoring approach to admissibility of uncertainty measures in expert systems, J. Math. Anal. and Appl., 159, 550–594.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M.L., Murofushi T., and Sugeno M. (1992). Fuzzy measure of fuzzy events defined by fuzzy integrals, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50, 293–313.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch M., Nguyen H.T. and Walker E.A. (1995). Fundamentals of Uncertainty Calculi with Applications to Fuzzy Inference, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove A. (1988). Two modellings for theory change, J. Philos. Logic, 17, 157–170.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta C.P. (1993). A note on the transformation of possibilistic information into probabilistic information for investment decisions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 56, 175, 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwét H. (1997). Normalized conditional possibility distributions and informational connection between fuzzy variables, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 5, 177–198.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I. (1975). All kinds of possibility, Philosophical Review, 84, 321–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek P. (1994). A qualitative fuzzy possibilistic logic, Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning, 12, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek P., Harmancova D., Esteva F., Garcia P. and Godo L. (1994). On modal logics for qualitative possibility in a fuzzy setting, Proc. of the 11th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (Lopez de Mantaras R. and Poole D., eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 278–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern J. (1996). Defining relative likelihood in partially-ordered preferential structures, Proc. of the 12th Conf on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (Horvitz E, and Jensen J., eds.), Morgan Kaufmann,, San Francisco, 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy G.H., Littlewood J.E. and Polya G. (1934). Inequalities, Cambridge University Press. 2nd edition, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmanec D. and Klir GJ. (1997). On information-preserving transformations, Int. J. of General Systems, 26(3), 265–290.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh H.M. and Caramazza A. (1976). A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language, J. of Exp. Psycho., General, 105, 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstein I.N. and Milnor J., (19..). An axiomatic approach to measurable utility, Econometrics 21, 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestir K., Nguyen H.T. and Rogers G.S. (1991). A random set formalism for evidential reasoning, Conditional Logic in Expert Systems (Goodman I.R. et al., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 309–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higashi and Klir G. (1982). Measures of uncertainty and information based on possibility distributions, Int J. General Systems, 8, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higashi and Klir G. (1983). On the notion of distance representing information closeness, Int. J. General Systems, 9, 103–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal E. (1978). Conditional possibilities independence and noninteraction, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 283–297.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal E. (1991). Naturalized logic and chain sets, Information Sciences,57-58, 31–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle U. (1976). MaBe auf unscharfen Mengen, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie and verwandte Gebiete, 36, 179–188.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz E.J., Heckerman D.E. and Langîotz C.P. (1986). A framework for comparing alternative formalisms for plausible reasoning, Proc. of the 5th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’86), Philadelphia, PA, 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ. (1981). Robust Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D. (1991). Graphoids and natural conditional functions, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 5, 489–504.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguchi M. and Kume Y. (1994). Necessity measures defined by level set inclusions: Nine kinds of necessity measures and their properties, Int. J. of General Systems, 22, 245–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguichi M., Ichihashi H. and Tanaka H. (1989). Possibilistic linear programming with measurable multiattribute value functions, ORSA J. on Computing, 1, 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray J.Y. (1992). Bayesian updating and belief functions, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man ybernetics, 22, 1144–1152.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jain P. and Agogino A.M. (1990). Stochastic sensitivity analysis using fuzzy influence diagrams, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4 (Shachter R.D., Levitt T.S., Kanal L.N. and Lemmer J.F., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslyn C. (1997). Measurement of possibilistic histograms from interval data, Int. J. of General Systems, 26(1-2), 9–33.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kampé de Fériet J. (1982). Interpretation of membership functions of fuzzy sets in terms of plausibility and belief, Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes (Gupta M.M. and Sanchez E., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A. (1978). Le calcul des admissibilités. Private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir G.J. (1990), A principle of uncertainty and information invariance, Int. J. of General Systems, 17, 249–275.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir G.J. and Yuan B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic — Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ. and Folger T. (1988). Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty and Information, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ. and Harmanek D. (1994). On modal logic interpretations of possibility theory, Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Syst., 2, 237–245.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ. and Parviz B. (1992). Probability-possibility transformations: A comparison, Int. J. of General Systems, 21, 291–310.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir G. J. (1999). Measures of uncertainty and information, Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets (Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), Kluvver Acad. Pub]., 1999. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko B. (1990). Fuzziness vs. probability, Int. J. of General Systems, 17, 211–240.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kovalerchuk B.Y. and Shapiro D.I. (1988). On the relation of the probability theory and the fuzzy setz theory foundations, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 7, 385–396.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kramosil I (1996). Nonstandard approach to possibility theory, Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Syst., 4, 275–301.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse R. and Meyer K.D. (1987). Statistics with Vague Data, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse R., Gebhardt J., Klawonn F. (1994). Foundations of Fuzzy Systems, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe S. (1999). Traitement Subjectif de l’Incertitude par la Théorie des Possibilités: Application a la Prévision et au Suivi des Crues, Ph. D. Thesis, IMRS-Eau, Québec University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe S. Bobée B. (1999). Revision of possibility distributions: A Bayesian inference pattern, to appear in Fuzzy Sets and Systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre V., Mauris G. and Foulloy L., (1998). A simple modélisation of measurement uncertainty: The truncated triangular possibility distribution, Proc 7th Int. Conf on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems (IPMU’98), Paris, Editions Médicales et Scientifiques, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laviolette M. and Seaman Jr. J. W. (1994). The efficacy of fuzzy representations of uncertainty. IEEE Trans, on Fuzzy Systems, 2, 4–

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laviolette M., Seaman Jr. J. W., Barrett J.D. and Woodall W.H. (1995). Fuzziness vs. probability, Technometrics, 37, 249–259.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1973). Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. 2nd edition, Billing and Sons Ltd., Worcester, UK, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. L. (1979). Counterfactuals and comparative possibility, If s (Harper W. L., Stalnaker R. and Pearce G., eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Q.D. (1997). The random set and the cutting of random fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 86, 223–234.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang P. and Song F. (1996). What does a probabilistic interpretation of fuzzy sets mean?, IEEE trans, on Fuzzy Systems, 4, 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley D.V. (1982). Scoring rules and the inevitability of probability, Int. Statist Rev., 50, 1–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Loginov V.l. (1966). Probability treatment of Zadeh membership functions and their use in pattern recognition, Eng. Cyber., 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi, S. (1992). An interpretation of membership functions and the properties of general probabilistic operators as fuzzy set operators-Part I: Case of type 1 fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49, 271–283.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi, S. (1997). An interpretation of membership functions and the properties of general probabilistic operators as fuzzy set operators-Part II. Extensions to three-valued and interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92, 31–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, Y. Nguyen, H.T., and Hichihashi H. (1993). Maximum entropy algorithms for uncertainty measures, Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Syst., 1, 69–93.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manton K.G., Woodbury M.A. and Tolley H.D. Statistical Applications Using Fuzzy Sets., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marichai J.-L. (1998). On Sugeno integral as an aggregation function, Tech. Rep. 9710, GEMME, Fac. d’Ecomomie, Université de Liege, Belgium, Proceedings of EUFIT′98 — Vol. I, Aachen, Germany, 540–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslov V. (1987). Méthodes Opératorielles, Editions MIR, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslov V. and Samborski S.N. (\992)Idempotent Analysis. Advances in Soviet Mathematics 13, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathéron G. (1975). Random Sets and Integral Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maung I. (1995). Two characterizations of a minimum information principle for possibilistic reasoning, Int. X Approximate Reasoning, 12, 133–156.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mesiar R. (1992). Characterisation of possibility measures of fuzzy events using Markov kernels, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 46, 301–303.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mesiar R., (1994). On the integral representation of fuzzy possibility measures, Int. J. of General Systems, 21, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesiar R. (1997). Possibility measures, integration, and fuzzy possibility measures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92, 191–196.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molchanov I.S. (1993). Limit Theorems for Unions of Random Closed Sets, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1561, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H. (1988). Axioms of Cooperative De cision Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundici D. (1992). The logic of Ulam games with lies, Knowledge, Belief and Strategic Interaction (Bicchieri C. and Dalla Chiara M., eds.), Cambridge University Press, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murofushi T. and Sugeno M. (1989). In interpretation of fuzzy measure and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29, 201–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Murofushi T. and Sugeno M. (1993). Continuous from above possibility measures and f-additive fuzzy measures on separable metic spaces: Characterization and regularity, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 54, 351–354.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias S. (1978)/Fuzzy variables, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 97–110.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Narin’yani A.S. (1980). Sub-definite set — New data-type for knowledge representation, Memo n° 4-232, Computing Center, Novosibirsk, URSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natvig B. (1983). Possibility versus probability, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10, 31–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nau R.F. (1992). Decision analysis with indeterminate or incoherent probabilities, Annals of Operations Research — Vol: Choice Under Uncertainty (Fishburn P.C. and LaValle I.H., Eds.), to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negoita C.V. and Ralescu D. (1987), Simulation, Knowledge-Based Computing, and Fuzzy Statistics, Van Nostrand Reinhold Comp., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H.T. (1978a). On random sets and belief functions, J. Math. Anal. and Appl., 65, 531–542

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H.T. (1978b). On conditional possibility distributions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 299–309.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H.T. (1984). On modeling of linguistic information using random sets, Information Science, 34, 265–274.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H.T. and Walker E.A. (1994), On decision making using belief functions, Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence (Yager R.R. et al., Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg T. (1986), Random capacities and their distributions, Proha. Th. Rel. Fields, 73, 281–297.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Okuda T., Tanaka H, and Asai K. (1978). A formulation of fuzzy decision problems with fuzzy information, using probability measures of fuzzy events, Information and Control 38, 135–147.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Orlov A.I. (1978). Fuzzy and random sets, Prikladnoï Mnogomiernii Statisticheskii Analyz (Nauka, Moscow), 262-280 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y. and Yuan B. (1997), Bayesian inference of fuzzy probabilities, Int. J. of General Systems, 26 (1-2), 73–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paris J.B. (1997). A semantics for fuzzy logic, Soft Computing, 1, 143–147.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z. (1991). Rough sets — Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kiuwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J., (1990). Integrating probability and logic, Readings in Uncertain Reasoning (Shafer G. and Pearl J., Eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 677–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirlot M. (1995). A characterization of’ min’ as a procedure for exploiting valued preference relations and related results, J. of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 4, 37–56.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prade H. (1979). Nomenclature of fuzzy measures, Proc. 1st Int. Seminar on Theory of Fuzzy Sets, Linz, Austria, Sept, 24-29, 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prade H. (1982). Modal semantics and fuzzy set theory. In: Fuzzy Set and Possibility Theory. Recent Developments. (R.R. Yager, ed.), Pergamon Press, New York, 232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prade H. and Yager R.R. (1994). Estimations of expectedness and potential surprize in possibility theory, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 2, 417–428.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Puri M. L. and Ralescu D. (1982). A possibility measure is not a fuzzy measure, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 7, 311–313.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ralescu D. and Adams G. (1980). The fuzzy integral, J. Math, Anal. and Appl. 75, 562–570.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramer A. (1989). Conditional possibility measures, Cybernetics and Systems, 20, 233–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ramer A. (1990a). Structure of possibilistic information metrics and distances: Properties, Int. J. of General Systems, 17, 21–32.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramer A. (1990b). Possibilistic information metrics and distances: Characterizations of structure, Int. J. of General Systems, 18, 1–10.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramer A. (1990c). Uncertainty in the Dempster-Shafer theory: A critical re-examination, Int J. of General Systems, 18, 155–166.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raufaste E. and Da Silva Neves R. (1998). Empirical evaluation of possibility theory in human radiological diagnosis, Prot\ of the 13th Europ. Conf on Artificial Intelligence (ECAl’98) (Prade H., ed.), John Wiley & Sons, 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins H.E. (1944). On the measure of a random set. Ann. Math. Statist, 15, 70–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini E.H. (1991). Approximate reasoning: Past, present, future, Information Sciences, 57-58, 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales T. (1982). Fuzzy sets as set classes, Stochastica, 6, 249–264.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez E. (1978). On possibility-qualification in natural languages, Information Sciences, 15, 45–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sanguessa R., Cabos J. and Cortes U. (1998). Possibiiistic conditional independence: A similarity-based measure and its application to causal network learning, InL J. Approximate Reasoning, 18, 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanguessa R., Cortes U. and Gisolfi A. (1998), Possibiiistic conditional independence: a similarity-based measure and its application to causal network learning, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 18, 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D. (1986). Integral representation without additivity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 97(2), 255–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shackle G. L. S. (1961). Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs, (2nd edition), Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. (1976a). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. (1976b). A theory of statistical evidence, Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Sciences — Vol. II, (Harper and Hooker, eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 365–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. (1987). Belief functions and possibility measures, Analysis of Fuzzy Information — Vol. I: Mathematics and Logic (Bezdek J.C., Ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 51–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley S. (1971). Cores of convex games, Int. J. of Game Theory, 1, 12–26.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy P. (1991). On Spohn’s rule for revision of beliefs, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 5, 149–181.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy P. (1992). Using possibility theory in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 52, 129–142.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shilkret N. (1971). Maxitive measure and integration, Indag. Math., 33, 109–116.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham Y. (1988). Reasoning About Change — Time and Causation from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowinski R. (Eds.) (1998). Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations Research and Statistics, The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series (Dubois D. and Prade H., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P. (1982). Possibiiistic inference from statistical data, Proc. of the 2nd World Conf on Mathematics at the Sendee of Man, Las Palmas (Canary Island), Spain, 611–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets P. (1990). Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5 (Henrion M. et al, Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets P. and Kennes R. (1994). The transferable belief model, Artificial Intelligence, 66, 191–234.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CA.B. (1961). Consistency in statistical inference and decision, J. Royal Statist. Soc., B-23, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn W. (1988). Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states, Causation in Decision, Belief Change and Statistics (Harper W. and Skyrms B., Eds.), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn W. (1990). A general non-probabilistic theory of inductive reasoning, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 4 (Shachter R.D., Levitt T.S., Kanal L.N. and Lemmer J.F., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spott M. (1999). A theory of possibility distributions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 102, 135–155.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stallings W, (1977). Fuzzy set theory versus Bayesian statistics, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 216–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studeny M. (1995). Conditional independence and natural conditional functions, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 12, 43–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez Garcia F. and Gil Alvarez P. (1986). Two families of fuzzy integrals, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18, 67-81

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudkamp T. (1992a). On probability-possibility transformations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 51, 73–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sudkamp T. (1992b). The semantics of plausibility and possibility, Int. J. of General Systems, 21, 273–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sudkamp T. (1993). Geometric measures of possibilistic uncertainty, Int. J. of General Systems, 22, 7–23.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno M. (1974). Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications, Ph. D. Thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno M. (1977). Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals — A survey, Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes (Gupta M.M., Saridis G.N. and Gaines B.R., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H., and Guo P.J. (1999). Possibilistic Data Analysis for Operations Research, Physic a-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H. and Ishibuchi H. (1993). Evidence theory of exponential possibility distributions. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 8, 123–140.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H., Ishibuchi H., Hayashi I. (1993). Identification method of possibility distributions and its application to discriminant analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 58, 41–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S.F. (1979). A theory of semantics and possible inference with application to decision analysis, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S.F. (1981). Possibilistic uncertainty and statistical inference, ORSA/TIMS Meeting, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S.F. (1995). Fuzziness and Probability, ACG Press, Wichita, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribus M. (1978). Comments on fuzzy sets, fuzzy algebras, and fuzzy statistics, Proc. IEEE, 67, 1168–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiporkova E. and De Baets B. (1998). A general framework for upper and lower possibilities and necessities, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 6, 1–33.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Viertl R. (1996). Statistical Methods for Non-Precise Data, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viertl R. and Hule H. (1991). On Bayes’ theorems for fuzzy data, Statistical Papers, 32, 115–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P. (1982). Aggregation of preferences: A review, Europ. J. Operational res., 9, 17–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walley P. (1991). Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley P. (1996). Measures of uncertainty in expert systems, Artificial Intelligence, 83, 1–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Walley P., (1997). Statisticaél inferences based on a second-order possibility distribution, Int J. of General Systems, 26, 337–383.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walley P. and de Cooman G.(1999) A behavioural model for linguistic uncertainty, Computing With Words (Wang P.P., ed.), Wiley, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten T.S., Budescu D.V., Rapoport A., Zwick R. and Forsyth B, (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms, J. of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P.Z. (1983). From the fuzzy statistics to the falling random subsets, Advances in Fuzzy Sets, Possibility Theory and Applications (Wang P.P., Eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 81–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P.Z. (1982). Fuzzy contactability and fuzzy variables, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 8, 81–92.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P.Z. and Sanchez E. (1982). Treating a fuzzy subset as a projectable random set, Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes (Gupta M.M. and Sanchez E., Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z. and Klir G. (1992). Fuzzy measure theory, Plenum Press, New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman L.A. (1987). Some applications of belief functions to statistical inference, Thesis, Univ. of Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson S.R., Weiss JJ. and Donnell M. (1979). Fuzzy decision analysis, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen T. (1984). Decision making under uncertainty with various assumptions about available information, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 14, 888–900.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkenhauer O. (1988). Possibility Theory with Applications to Data Analysis, Research Studies Press, Hertfordshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonneberger S. (1994). Generalization of an in verüble mapping between probability and possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 64, 229–240.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1979). Possibilistic decision making, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9, 388–392.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1980). A foundation for a theory of possibility, J. Cybernetics, 10, 177–204.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1981). A new methodology for ordinal multiobjective decisions based on fuzzy set, Decision Sciences, 12, 589–600.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1983). An introduction to applications of possibility theory, Human Systems Management, 3, 246–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1984). General multiple objective decision making and linguistically quantified statements, Int J. of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 389–400.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1985a). Q-projections of possibility distributions, IEEE trans. on Systems Man & Cybern., 15, 775–777.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1985b). On the relationships of methods of aggregation evidence in expert systems, Cybernetics and Systems, 16, 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1990). Ordinal measures of specificity, Int. J. Gener. Syst., 17, 57–72.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1992). On the specificity of a possibility distribution, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50, 279–292.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1993a). On the completion of qualitative possibility measures, IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 1, 184–195.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1993b). On the completion of priority orderings in non-monotonic reasoning systems. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Syst., 1, 139–165.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yan B. (1993). Semiconormed possibility integrals for application-oriented modelling, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 57, 239–248.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yan B. (1994). Seminormed possibility integrals for application-oriented modelling, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 61, 189–198.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Young V.R. and Wang S.S., Upating non-additive measures with fuzzy information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94, 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1968). Probability measures of fuzzy events, J. Math, Anal. Appl., 23, 421–427.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L. A. (1975a). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Information Sciences, Part I: 8, 199–249; Part II: 8, 301–357; Part III: 9, 43–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L. A. (1975b). Calculus of fuzzy restrictions, Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes (Zadeh L. A., Fu K. S., Shimura M. and Tanuka K., eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3-28. Reprinted in Fuzzy Sets and Applications; Selected Papers (Zadeh L.A., Yager R.R., Ovchinnikov S., Tong R.M. and Nguyen HT., Eds.), Wiley, New York, 1987, 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1979a).A theory of approximate reasoning, Machine Intelligence, Vol. 9 (Hayes J. E., Michie D. and Mikulich L. L., eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 149–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1979b). Fuzzy sets and information granularity. In: Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, (MM. Gupta, R.K. Ragade, R.R., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1985). Syllogistic reasoning in fuzzy logic and its application to usuality and reasoning with dispositions, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15, 754–763.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1995). Discussion: Probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive, Technometrics, 37, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ. (1987). Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwirn D. and Zwirn H. (1995). Confirmation non-probabiliste, Méthodes Logiques pour les Sciences Cognitives (Dubucs J. and Lepage F., eds.). Hermès, Paris., 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D., Nguyen, H.T., Prade, H. (2000). Possibility Theory, Probability and Fuzzy Sets Misunderstandings, Bridges and Gaps. In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds) Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets. The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4429-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4429-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6994-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4429-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics