Abstract
P. A. M. Dirac [1] emphasized the fact that several dramatic advances in physics have come from the solution of a previous conflict between two well established theories (which is just an example of the usefulness of the dialectic method). For instance, the contradiction between Newton’s mechanics and Maxwell’s electromagnetism was solved by Einstein with the introduction of special relativity. Similarly, the conflict between special relativity and Newtonian gravitation gave rise to general relativity. A conflict similar to the latter is the one existing at present between local realism and quantum mechanics. In fact, in both cases the conflict arises because it is predicted a violation of the principle of local action: by gravitational forces at a distance in the first case, and by the influence of a measurement on another one performed at a distant place, in quantum mechanics. As the principle of local action (signals cannot travel faster than light) is at the roots of relativity theory, I guess that a dramatic advance in physics will soon take place, when this conflict is solved.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. A. M. Dirac, Methods in theoretical physics, in: “From a life of physics,” A. Salam, Ed., Trieste Lectures, International. Energy Agency, Wien (1969).
J. S. Bell, Physics, New York, 1, 195 (1965).
K. Popper, Bell’s theorem: A note on locality, in: “Microphysical reality and quantum formalism,” G. Tarozzi, Ed., Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (in press).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev., 47, 111 (1935).
F. Selleri, Found. Phys., 12, 645 (1982).
L. de la Pena, A. M. Cetto, and T. A. Brody, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 5 177 (1972).
J. F. Clauser and A. Shimony, Rep. Progr. Phys., 41, 1881 (1978).
E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A, 115, 363 (1986).
J. F. Clauser and M. A. Hortte, Phys. Rev., D10, 526 (1974).
T. W. Marshall, private communication.
A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and O. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 460 (1981); 49, 91 (1981)
A. Aspect, J. Baliberd, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 1804 (1982)
A. Aspect P. Grangier Lett. Nuovo Cimento 45 435(1985).
W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790 (1985).
T. W. Marshall, E. Santos, and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett., 98A, 4 (1983).
T. W. Marshall, Towards a realistic theory of measurement, in: “Micro- physical reality and quantum formalism,” G. Tarozzi, Ed., Reidel Pub¬lishing Co., Dordrecht (in press).
T. K. Lo and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev., A23, 3003 (1981).
E. Santos, Phys. Rev., A30, 2128 (1984); A. Shimony, Phys. Rev., A30, 2130 (1984).
E. Santos, Phys. Lett., 1Q1A, 379 (1984).
G. C. Scalera, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 38, 16 (1983); 40, 353 (1984).
S. Notarrigo, Nuovo Cimento, 83 B, 173 (1984).
S. Pascazio, Phys. Lett., 111A, 339 (1985).
F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 39, 252 (1984).
S. Pascazio, Nuovo Cimento, 5, 23 (1985).
E. Santos, Stochastic electrodynamics and the Bell inequalities, in: “Open questions in quantum physics,” G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, Eds., Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1985).
S. Caser, Phys. Lett., 102A, 152 (1984).
D. Home and T. W. Marshall, Phys. Lett., 113A, 182 (1985).
T. W. Marshall, Phys. Lett., 99A, 163 (1983);100A, 225 (1984).
R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, Preprint Harvard University (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santos, E. (1987). Critical Analysis of the Tests of Local Realism Versus Quantum Mechanics. In: Honig, W.M., Kraft, D.W., Panarella, E. (eds) Quantum Uncertainties. NATO ASI Series, vol 162. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5386-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5386-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5388-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5386-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive