Skip to main content

Abstract

Quantitative nondestructive evaluation, which aims at recovering information regarding certain parameters of the materials from the nondestructive evaluation (NDE) measurements, has attracted attention of the researchers in an increasing manner over the last decade. The work presented here represents the ongoing effort in quantitative nondestructive evaluation in the form of a computer simulation of the image formation process (1,2) and represents the x-ray component of broad effort to model all of the major inspection methods (3). To date one of the major limitation of this process modeling effort is the inability to handle complex part geometries. The developed code targets simulating x-ray inspection of parts designed through computer aided design (CAD) packages. For such a simulation tool to have practical applications, the physics of initial x-ray beam generation, x-ray and target interactions, x-ray and detector interactions should be modelled with sufficient accuracy and flexibility that the effects of the adjustable parameters found on the x-ray inspection systems can be simulated. While the physics in the undertaken work is modelled after well established principles, the information regarding the geometrical representation of the target object is provided by a CAD package through the developed interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.N. Gray. ‘Three Dimensional Modeling of Projection Radiography’, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol 7A, ed. by D. O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Publishing Co., 1988 p. 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.N. Gray, F. Inane and B.E. Shull. ‘Three Dimensional Modeling of Projection Radiography’ Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 8A, ed. by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Publishing Co., 1989 p. 345–350.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. J.N. Gray, T.A. Gray, N. Nakagawa, and R.B. Thompson, ‘Models for Predicting NDE Reliability’, Metals Handbook, Vol. 17, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.M. Burte and D.E. Chimenti, ‘Unified Life Cycle Engineering: An Emerging Design Concept’, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 6B, ed. by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Publishing Co., 1987 p. 1797–1809.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. R.B. Thompson, D.O. Thompson, H.M. Burte and D.E. Chimenti, ‘Use of Field-Flaw Interaction Theories to Quantify and Improve Inspection Reliability’, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 3A, ed. by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Publishing Co., 1984 p. 13–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. J.S. Cargill et al. ‘Retirement for Cause Inspection System Design’, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 1, ed. by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Plenum Publishing Co., 1982 p. 83–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. C.M. Lee, L. Kissell, R.H. Pratt, H.K. Tseng, Phys. Rev. A13, No. 5 p. 1714–1727 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. SDRC-Ideas, Structural Dynamics Research Corporation, Ohio, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.B. Brown, J.W. Criss and L.S. Birks, ‘Sensitivity of x-ray films. I. A model for sensitivity in the 1–100 keV region ’ Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 37, No. 8, p. 3722–3731 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.C. Dainty and R. Shaw Image Science principles, analysis and evaluation of photographic-type imaging, Academic Press, (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Segal, D. Ingman and Y. Bushlin, ‘Noise and Granularity in Radiographs’ Materials Evaluation, Vol. 46, p. 513–517, March (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.F. Judy and R.G. Swenson, ‘Lesion detection and signal-to-noise ratio in CT images’ Med. Phys., Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 13–23, Jan./Feb. (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P.F. Judy and R.G. Swenson, ‘Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance’ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol.4, No.5, May (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.D. Loo, K. Doi and C.E. Metz, ‘A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads’ Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 29, No. 7 p. 837–856, (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Inanc, F., Gray, J. (1990). A CAD Interfaced Simulation Tool for X-Ray NDE Studies. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5774-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5772-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics