Abstract
— We examine a model of R&D competition and cooperation in the presence of spillovers. However, unlike virtually all the literature, we treat these spillovers as endogenous and under the control of firms. We show that it is then essential to make a number of distinctions that are ignored in the literature. In particular we need to distinguish between the amount of R&D that firms do and the amount of spillover they generate; between information sharing and research coordination; between each of the latter and cooperation; between substitute and complementary research paths; between firms being located in the same industry or in different industries. These distinctions matter because, as we show, coordination can arise without cooperation (different industries, complementary research, research design) while cooperation need not induce information sharing (same industry, substitute research, information sharing). In many cases, however, allowing cooperation is sufficient to induce full infonnation sharing/research coordination, in which case the justification, if any, for a technology policy that takes the form of an R&D subsidy lies in encouraging firms to undertake more R&D. Our analysis suggests that cooperative arrangements between firms may often produce too little R&D, and therefore that R&D subsidies can be justified — but not to correct information problems, but other market failures in the amount of R&D firms choose to do.
We are grateful to CEPR for a research grant under their Competition and Markets Programme which enabled us to collaborate. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at seminars at CREST-Ensae, OECD, Insead, University of Leuven, WZB Berlin and at the French Economic Association Conference in Nantes (June 1995), and we would like to thank seminar participants for their comments. We would particularly like to acknowledge the many useful comments we received from Raymond De Bondt, David Encaoua, Bruno Jullien, Patrick Rey and two anonymous referees.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y., Ulph, D. (1988). — “R&D Rivalry Versus R&D Cooperation Under Uncertainty”, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 54, pp. 373–384.
Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y., Ulph, D. (1989). — “Strategic R&D Policy”, Economic Journal (Supplement), 99, pp. 74–83.
Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y., Ulph, D. (1991). — “Strategic Innovation”, in M. Bacharach, M. Dempster and J. Enos (Eds), Mathematical Models of Economics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y., Ulph, D. (1992). — “Game-Theoretic Approaches” in P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Oxford; Basil Blackwell, forthcoming).
Beath, J., Ulph, D. (1989). — “Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: A Comment”, Discussion Paper N° 89/235, University of Bristol, Department of Economics, Bristol.
Bulow, J., Geanakoplos, J., Klemperer, P. (1985). — “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements”, Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp. 488–511.
Crépon, B., Duguet, E., Encaoua, D., Mohnen, P. (1992). — “Cooperative, Non- cooperative R&D and Optimal patent lile”, INSEE Discussion Paper 9208.
D’Aspremont, C, Jacquemin, A. (1988). — “Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in a Duopoly with Spillovers”, American Economic Review, 78, pp. 1133–1137.
De Fraja, G. (1991). — “Strategic Spillovers in Patent Races”, mimeo (University of Bristol).
Jacquemin, A. (1988). — “Cooperative Agreements in R&D and European Antitrust Policy”, European Economic Review, 32, pp. 551–60.
Jacquemin, A., Soete, L. (1994). — “Cooperation in R&D, Efficiency and European Policy”, mimeo.
Katz, M. (1986). — “An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development”, RAND Journal of Economics, 17 (Winter), pp. 527–43.
Katz, M., Ordover, J. (1990). — “R&D Cooperation and Competition”, Brookings Papers, Microeconomics, pp. 137–203.
Kestelloot, K., De Bondt, R. (1993). — “Demand-Creating R&D in a Symmetric Oligopoly”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 171–183.
Motta, M. (1992a). — “Cooperative R&D and Vertical Product Differentiation”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, pp. 643–61.
Motta, M. (1992b). — “National R&D Cooperation: a Special Type of Strategic Policy”, mimeo, CORE, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Motta, M. (1992b). — “National R&D Cooperation: a Special Type of Strategic Policy”, mimeo, CORE, Louvain-la-Neuve.
Ulph, D. (1990). — “Technology Policy in the Completed European Market”, Discussion Paper N° 90/264 (University of Bristol, Department of Economics).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Katsoulacos, Y., Ulph, D. (2000). Innovation Spillovers and Technology Policy. In: The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3194-1_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4971-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3194-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive