Skip to main content

Error Bounds and Superlinear Convergence Analysis of Some Newton-Type Methods in Optimization

  • Chapter
Nonlinear Optimization and Related Topics

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 36))

Abstract

We show that, for some Newton-type methods such as primal-dual interior-point path following methods and Chen-Mangasarian smoothing methods, local superlinear convergence can be shown without assuming the solutions are isolated. The analysis is based on local error bounds on the distance from the iterates to the solution set.

This research is supported by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-9731273.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burke, J. and Xu, S. (1997), “A non-interior predictor-corrector path following algorithm for the monotone linear complementarity problem,” Preprint, Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, J. and Xu, S. (1997), “A non-interior predictor-corrector path-following method for LCP,” Preprint, Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, B. and Chen, X. (1997), “A global linear and local quadratic continuation smoothing method for variational inequalities with box constraints,” Report, Department of Management and Systems, Washington State University, Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, B. and Chen, X. (1997), “A global and local superlinear continuation-smoothing method for Po + R o and monotone NCP,” Report, Department of Management and Systems, Washington State University, Pullman; SIAM J. Op-tint., to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, B. and Harker, P. T. (1993), “A non-interior-point continuation method for linear complementarity problems,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 14, 1168 1190.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, B. and Xiu, N. (1997), “A global linear and local quadratic non-interior continuation method for nonlinear complementarity problems based on ChenMangasarian smoothing function,” Report, Department of Management and Systems, Washington State University, Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C. and Mangasarian, O. L. (1995), “Smoothing methods for convex inequalities and linear complementarity problems,” Math. Programming, 71, 51–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, C. and Mangasarian, O. L. (1996), “A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems,” Comput. Optim. Appl., 5, 97138.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X., Qi, L., and Sun, D. (1996), “Global and superlinear convergence of the smoothing Newton method and its application to general box constrained variational inequalities,” Report, School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Sydney; Math. Comp., to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cottle, R. W., Giannessi, F., and Lions, J.-L., editors. (1980), Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems: Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cottle, R. W., Pang, J.-S., and Stone, R. E.. (1992), The Linear Complementarity Problem, Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferris, M. C. and Pang, J.-S., editors. (1997), Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabriel, S. A. and Moré, J. J. (1997), “Smoothing of mixed complementarity problems,” in Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, edited by M. C. Ferris and J.-S. Pang, SIAM, Philadelphia, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hotta, K., Inaba, M., and Yoshise, A. (1998), “A complexity analysis of a smoothing method using CHKS-functions for monotone linear complementarity problems,” Discussion paper, Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jansen, B., Roos, K., Terlaky, T., and Yoshise, A. (1997), “Polynomiality of primal-dual affine scaling algorithms for nonlinear complementarity problems,” Math. Programming, 78, 315–345.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanzow, C. (1996), “Some noninterior continuation methods for linear complementarity problems,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 17, 851–868.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanzow, C. and Fukushima, M. (1996), “Equivalence of the generalized cornplementarity problem to differentiable unconstrained minimization,” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 90, 581–603.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kojima, M., Megiddo, N., and Mizuno, S. (1993), “A general framework of continuation methods for complementarity problems,” Math. Oper. Res., 18, 945–963.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kojima, M., Megiddo, N., and Noma T. (1991), “Homotopy continuation methods for nonlinear complementarity problems,” Math. Oper. Res., 16, 754–774.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kojima, M., Megiddo, N., Noma, T. and Yoshise, A. (1991), A Unified Approach to Interior Point Algorithms for Linear Complementarity Problems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 538, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kojima, M., Noma, T., and Yoshise, A. (1994), “Global convergence in infeasibleinterior-point algorithms,” Math. Programming, 65, 43–72.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, Z.-Q. and Tseng, P. (1993), “Error bounds and convergence analysis of feasible descent methods: a general approach,” Ann. Oper. Res., 46, 157–178.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Mizuno, S., Todd, M., and Ye, Y. (1993), “On adaptive-step primal-dual interior-point algorithms for linear programming,” Math. Oper. Res., 18, 964–981.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Monteiro, R. D. C. and Zhou, F. (1997), “On superlinear convergence of infeasible-interior-point algorithms for linearly constrained convex programs,” Comput. Optim. Appl., 8, 245–262.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nesterov, Y. E. and Nemirovskii, A. S. (1993), Interior Point Polynomial Methods in Convex Programming: Theory and Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pang, J.-S. (1995), “Complementarity problems,” in Handbook on Global Optimization, edited by R. Horst and P. Pardalos, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, 271–338.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pang, J.-S. (1997), “Error bounds in mathematical programming,” Math. Programming, 79, 299–332.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Potra, F. A. and Ye, Y. (1996), “Interior point methods for nonlinear complementarity problems,” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 88, 617–647.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ralph, D. and Wright, S. J. (1997), “Superlinear convergence of an interior-point method for monotone variational inequalities,” in Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, edited by M. C. Ferris and J.-S. Pang, SIAM, Philadelphia, 345–385.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ralph, D. and Wright, S. J. (1996; revised 1998 ), “Superlinear convergence of an interior-point method despite dependent constraints,” preprint, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simantiraki, E. M. and Shanno, D. F. (1997), “An infeasible-interior-point algorithm for solving mixed complementarity problems,” in Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, edited by M. C. Ferris and J.-S. Pang, SIAM, Philadelphia, 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smale, S. (1987), “Algorithms for solving equations,” in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, edited by A. M. Gleason, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 172–195.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sun, J. and Zhao, G. (1996), “Global linear and local quadratic convergence of a long-step adaptive-mode interior point method for some monotone variational inequality problems,” Report, Department of Decision Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore; SIAM J. Optim., to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sun, J. and Zhao, G. (1997), “A long-step quadratically convergent interior point method for nonlinear monotone variational inequality problems,” Report, Department of Decision Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tseng, P. (1992), “Global linear convergence of a path-following algorithm for some monotone variational inequality problems,” J. Optim. Theory Appl., 75, 265–279.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tseng, P. (1995), “On linear convergence of iterative methods for the variational inequality problem,” J. Comp. Appl. Math., 60, 237–252.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Tseng, P. (1995), “Simplified analysis of an O(nL)-iteration infeasible predictor-corrector path following method for monotone LCP,” in Recent Trends in Optimization Theory and Applications, edited by R. P. Agarwal, World Scientific, Singapore, 423–434.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Tseng, P. (1996), “Analysis of infeasible path-following methods using the Alizadeh-Haeberly-Overton direction for the monotone semi-definite LCP,” Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tseng, P. (1997), “An infeasible path-following method for monotone complementarity problems,” SIAM J. Optim., 7, 386–402.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Tseng, P. (1998), “Analysis of a non-interior continuation method based on ChenMangasarian smoothing functions for complementarity problems,” in Reformulation–Nonsmooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods edited by M. Fukushima and L. Qi, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wright, S. J. (1997), Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wright, S. J. and Ralph, D. (1996), “A superlinear infeasible-interior-point algorithm for monotone complementarity problems,” Math. Oper. Res., 21, 815–838.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, S. (1997), “The global linear convergence and complexity of a non-interior path-following algorithm for monotone LCP based on Chen-Harker-KanzowSmale smoothing functions,” Preprint, Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tseng, P. (2000). Error Bounds and Superlinear Convergence Analysis of Some Newton-Type Methods in Optimization. In: Pillo, G.D., Giannessi, F. (eds) Nonlinear Optimization and Related Topics. Applied Optimization, vol 36. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3226-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3226-9_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4823-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3226-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics