Skip to main content

The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method

  • Chapter
EMI/EMC Computational Modeling Handbook

Abstract

The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method provides a direct integration of Maxwell’s time-dependent equations. During the past decade, the FDTD method has gained prominence amongst numerical techniques used in electromagnetic analysis. Its primary appeal is its remarkable simplicity. Furthermore, since the FDTD is a volume-based method, it is exceptionally effective in modeling complex structures and media. However, the distinct feature of the FDTD method, in comparison to the Method of Moments (MoM) and the Finite Elements Method (FEM) (see Chapters 4 and 5) is that it is a time-domain technique. This implies that one single simulation results in a solution that gives the response of the system to a wide range of frequencies. The time-domain solution, represented as a temporal waveform, can then be decomposed into its spectral components using Fourier Transform techniques. This advantage makes the FDTD especially wellsuited for most EMI/EMC problems in which a wide frequency range is intrinsic to the simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S.D. Conte and C. de Boor, Elementary Numerical Analysis: An Algorithmic Approach, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. K.E. Atkinson, An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. K.S. Yee, “Numerical solution of initial value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 14, pp. 302–307, 1966.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference TimeDomain Method, Artech House: Boston, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.S. Kunz and R.J. Luebbers, The Finite Difference Time Domain Method for Electromagnetics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.L. Higdon, “Radiation Boundary Conditions for Elastic Wave Propagation,” SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 27, pp. 831–870, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. O.M. Ramahi, “Complementary operators: A method to annihilate artificial reflections arising from the truncation of the computational domain in the solution of partial differential equations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 43, pp. 697–704, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O.M. Ramahi, “Complementary boundary operators for wave propagation problems,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 133, pp. 113–128, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J-P. Berenger, “A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 114, pp. 185–200, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. J-P. Berenger, “Three-dimensional perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 127, pp. 363–379, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R.L. Higdon, “Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic waves in stratified media,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 101, pp. 386–418, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. R.L. Higdon, “Radiation Boundary Conditions for Dispersive Waves,” SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 31, pp. 64–100, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M.J. Barth and R.R. McLeod and R.W. Ziolkowski, “A near and far-field projection algorithm for Finite-Difference Time-Domain codes,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol. 6, pp. 5–18, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I.J. Craddock and C.J. Railton, “Application of the FDTD method and a full time-domain near-field transform to the problem of radiation from a PCB,” Electronic Letters, vol. 29, pp. 2017–2018, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.J. Luebbers, K.S. Kunz, M. Schneider, and F. Hunsberger, “A finitedifference time-domain near zone to far zone transformation,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 39, pp. 429–433, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C.L. Britt, “Solution of electromagnetic scattering problems using time domain techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 37, pp. 1181–1192, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Archambeault, B., Ramahi, O.M., Brench, C. (1998). The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. In: EMI/EMC Computational Modeling Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5124-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5124-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5126-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5124-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics