Skip to main content

Thomas A. Sebeok’s Doctrine of Signs

  • Chapter
Classics of Semiotics

Part of the book series: Topics in Contemporary Semiotics ((TICSE))

Abstract

This being a very personal reckoning, I would like to seize this occasion to publicly avow my good fortune at having first encountered semiotic notions in a University of Chicago seminar of Morris’ in the early 1940s—precisely midway, that is, between his Foundations of the Theory of Signs (1938) and Signs, Language, and Behavior (1946). 1 have thus had the singular, and very likely unique, privilege of having studied both with Morris and, not long afterwards, Jakobson, the two having cross-pollinated in the intervening years. (Sebeok, 1976: 155)

Thomas A. Sebeok was born in Budapest in 1920, and arrived in the United States in 1937, where he first studied at the University of Chicago (B.A. 1941), with Charles Morris as his most important professor. He then attended Princeton University (M.A. 1943; Ph.D. 1945), where Roman Jakobson in particular, from his base in New York, exercised a great influence on him. Since 1943, Sebeok has taught linguistics, anthropology, and semiotics at Indiana University in Bloomington, where he also directs the Research Center for Language and Semiotic Studies. In 1975 he was president of the Linguistic Society of America. From 1976 to 1980 he was Executive Director of the Semiotic Society of America, whose founding and rapid growth can largely be attributed to his initiative and expertise, and in 1984 he served as its president.

Semiosis must be recognized as a pervasive fact of nature as well as of culture. In such matters, then, I declare myself not only a Peircean but a (René) Thomist. (Sebeok, 1979a: 64)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adey, W. R. (1967). “Historical Review.” In: Diane M. Ramsey, ed., Information and Control Processes in Living Systems (pp. 20–22 ). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, E. (1975). Semiotic Approaches to Psychotherapy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, E. (1980). “How do reflexive systems communicate?” In: T. A. Sebeok, ed., Semiotic Systems and Their Functions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, E. (1981). “Medical Semiotics: A New Paradigm.” Semiotica, 37, 165–191. (Essay review of T. von Uexküll, 1979c.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, E. (1983). Medical Semiotics: The State of the Art. Unpublished ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, R. A. (1975). The Cistercian Sign Language: A Study in Non-verbal Communication. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Cistercian Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, J. D., and Silk, J. (1980). “The Structure of the Early Universe.” Scientific American, 242, 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentele, G., and Bystfina, J. (1978). Semiotik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. von. (1950). “An Outline of General Systems Theory.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1939). “Linguistic Aspects of Science.” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, I (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, S. (1938). The Doctrine of Signatures. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, E. S. (1960). Eskimo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1886). Alice’s Adventures Under Ground. New York: Dover, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. N. (1974). “The Two Approaches to Language: Philosophical and Historical Reflections on the Point of Departure of Jean Poinsot’s Semiotic.” The Thomist, 38, 856–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. N. (1985). “Editorial Afterword” to Poinsot (1632), q.v., pp. 394–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The Hidden Order of Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilers, F.-J. (1967). Zur Publizistik schriftloser Kulturen in Nordost-Guinea. St. Augustin: Steiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1913). Totem und Tabu. Vienna: Heller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1925). “Verneinung.” In Studienausgabe, Bd. 3. Frankfurt a. M.: S. Fischer, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, H. (1955). “The Honey-Guides.” U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 208. Washington: Smithsonian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen (c.150–200). Opera omnia. Ed. C. G. Kühn. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965. Gamow, G. (1959). One, Two, Three… Infinity. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliard, E. T. (1963). “The Evolution of Bowerbirds.” Scientific American, 209, 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1968). “Echolocation and its Relevance to Communication Behavior.” In: Sebeok, 1968 (q.v.): 154–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadas, M. (1954). Ancilla to Classical Reading. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, H. (1967). “Verstehens-und Verständigungsmöglichkeiten zwischen Mensch und Tier.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen, 26, 234–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, H. (1973). “Ein verrätischer Vogel.” Tages-Anzeiger-Magazin, 23, 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein, 1973. (English trans. by A. V. Miller, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1957). Identität und Differenz. Pfullingen: Neske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1959). On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Iéas, M. (1969). The Biological Code. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1974). Main Trends in the Science of Language. New York: Harper and Row. Kahn, D. (1967). The Codebreakers. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1956. Kleinpaul, R. (1888). Sprache ohne Worte. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1966). Ecrits. Paris, Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawick-Goodall, J. van (1968). The Behavior of Free-Living Chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve (= Animal Behaviour Monographs,1, part 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La Pensée sauvage. Paris: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding. London: Bassett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, J. (1972). Primary and Secondary Communication-Modeling Systems. In: D. P. Lucid, ed., Soviet Semiotics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W. (1946). Signs, Language and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W. (1971). Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novalis. (1901). Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 4. Leipzig: Eugen Diederichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1868). “Some Consequences of Four Incapacities.” In: Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds., vols. 1–6), Arthur W. Burks (ed., vols. 7–8), The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (pars. 5.264–317). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. All references to the Collected Papers (CP) are according to the standard format of volume number followed by a period and paragraph number. Chronology for CP entries is based on Burks’ bibliography in Volume 8 of this collection, pp. 249–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (c. 1890 ). “A Guess at the Riddle.” CP 1.354–368, 373–375, 379–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (c. 1892 ). “Hegelism. Two Passages on Hegel from Separate Fragments.” CP 1.40 and 1. 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (c. 1895 ). Fragment, probably from Ch. 2 of a draft of Peirce’s Grand Logic. CP 2. 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1902). Sign. CP 2. 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1906). Portions of Basis ofPragmatism. CP 1.573–574, 5.549–554 (continuing 1.574), 5.448 n. 1 (following somewhat after 5.554).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poinsot, John. (1632). Tractatus de Signis. The semiotic of John Poinsot. Interpretive arrangement by John Deely in collaboration with Ralph Austin Powell. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeo, L. (1976). “Heraclitus and the Foundations of Semiotics.” Versus, 15, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J. (1972). Semiotic Approaches to Human Relations. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de. (1906–1911). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris, Payot, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, A. (1973). Communicational Structure: Analysis of a Psychotherapy Transaction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, F. von. (1799). “Ideen.” In H. Eichner (Ed.), Charakteristiken und Kritiken, Vol. 2 of the Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe (pp. 256–272 ). Munich: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1962). “The Texture of a Cheremis Incantation.” Mémoires de la Société Finno Ougrienne, 125, 523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1963). “Communication among Social Bees; Porpoises and Sonar; Man and Dolphin.” Review article. Language, 39, 448–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A., ed. (1968) Animal Communication. Techniques of Study and Results of Research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1972). Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1976). Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Bloomington: Indiana University, and Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1979a). The Sign and its Masters. Austin: University of Texas Press. Sebeok, T. A. (1979b). “Semiotics.” Explorer’s Journal, September, 132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1979c). “Prefigurements of Art.” Semiotica, 27, 1/3, 3–73. Reprinted in Sebeok (1981), q.v.: 210–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1981). The Play of Musement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1984). “Symptom.” In James E. Copeland, ed., New Directions in Linguistics and Semiotics (pp. 211–230 ). Houston: Rice University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1986). I Think I Am a Verb. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. and Umiker-Sebeok, D. J., eds. (1976). Speech Surrogates: Drum and Whistle Systems. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shands, H. C. (1970). Semiotic Approaches to Psychiatry. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shands, H. C. (1976). “Malinowski’s Mirror: Emily Dickinson as Narcissus.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 12, 300–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, P. B. (1821). “A Defense of Poetry.” In R. H. Shepherd, ed., The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, vol. 2 (pp. 1–38 ). London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, C. (1963). Man on His Nature. Cambridge: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiano, K. V. (1979). “A Semiotic Definition of Illness.” Semiotica, 28, (1/2), 107–125. Szöke, P. (1963). “ Omitomuzikolögia.” Magyar Tudomdny, 9, 592–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thich Nhat Hanh (1974). Zen Keys. Garden City: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1974). Modèles mathématiques de la morphogénèse: Receuil de textes sur la théorie des catastrophes et ses applications. Paris: Inédit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1975). Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. Reading, Mass.: W. A. Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1977). La Théorie des catastrophes: État présent et perspective. In: E. C. Zeeman, ed., Catastrophe Theory (pp. 615–621, 633–638). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Uexküll, J. von. (1920). Theoretische Biologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1973. Uexküll, J. von. (1934, 1940). Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen (with illustrations by Georg Kriszat) and Bedeutungslehre. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 1970. (An English translation of Bedeutungslehre by Thure von Uexküll appeared as a Special Issue of Semiotica [42, No. 1, 1982] under the title The theory of meaning. Page references in this present essay are to this English translation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, T. von. (1979a). “Die Zeichenlehre J. von Uexkülls.” Zeitschrift für Semiotik, I, No. 1, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, T. von. (1979b). “Die Umweltlehre Jakob von Uexkülls und die Wissenschaft von Menschen.” Merkur, 33, No. 7, 621–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, T. von, ed. (1979c). Lehrbuch der Psychosomatischen Medizin. Munich: Urban und Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umiker-Sebeok, D. J., and Sebeok, T. A., eds. (1978). Aboriginal Sign Languages of the Americas and Australia. 2 vols. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, U. (1968). “Semantics and Semiotics.” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 14, 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, V. von. (1947). Fälle und Probleme. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, I. P., and Winner, T. G. (1976). “The Semiotics of Cultural Texts.” Semiotica, 18, 101–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1945–1949). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations. Ger- man with facing English text trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baer, E. (1987). Thomas A. Sebeok’s Doctrine of Signs. In: Krampen, M., Oehler, K., Posner, R., Sebeok, T.A., von Uexküll, T. (eds) Classics of Semiotics. Topics in Contemporary Semiotics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9700-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9700-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9702-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9700-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics