Skip to main content

Women’s Slowly Changing Reality

  • Chapter
Sharing it all
  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

Combining a professional career with family life poses difficulties for women. This may come as a surprise to some. After all, feminism supposedly won its battles in the 1960s and 1970s. There should be no problem—egalitarianism surely prevails in two-career relationships and everything gets shared.

While the large majority of Harvard men have enjoyed professional success, bringing home even larger incomes, the career paths of many Radcliffe women have been broken, interrupted by marriage, children, and what some of them argue is a hostile, male-dominated world.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Note

  1. Fox Butterfield, “The Class of ’61 Offers Some Dissertation on Itself,” The New York Times (July 13, 1986), p. 30E.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holly Ornstein, “In Carrer Goals, Female Valedictorians Fall Behind,” The New York Times (Noverber 8, 1987), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cathy Guisewite, “Cathy,” The Austin-American Statesman (June 28, 1987). Copyright 1987 Universal Press Syndicate. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeanne H. Block, Sex Role Identity and Ego Development (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984), pp. 253–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Josephine Humphreys, Rich in love (New York: Viking, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karen Horney, “The Overvaluation of Love: A Study of aCommon Present-Day Feminine Type,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 3 (1934), pp. 605–638.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Constance Mitchell, “Marriage Rate: Which Study Do You Belive,” The Wall Street Journal (January 15, 1987), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coette Dowling, The Cinderella Complex: Women’s Hidden Fear of Independence (New york: Summit Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harriet E. Lerner, “Female Dependency in Context: Some Theoretical and Technical Considerations,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 53 (1983), pp. 697–705.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alice Adams, “Barcelona,” in Return Trips (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985), pp. 109–113. Copyright 1985 Alfred A. Knopf. Reprinted with permission.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Julia A. Sherman, “Social Values, Fermininity, and the Development of Female Competence,” Journal of Social Issues 32 (1976), pp. 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Helen Rogan, “Executive Woman Find it Difficult to Balance the Demand of Job, Home,” The Wall Street Journal (October 30, 1984), pp. 35, 55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Lucia A. Gilbert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilbert, L.A. (1988). Women’s Slowly Changing Reality. In: Sharing it all. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2792-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2792-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-42961-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2792-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics