Abstract
The scientific community is overwhelmed by the voluminous increase in the quantum of data on biological systems, including but not limited to the immune system. Consequently, immunoinformatics databases are continually being developed to accommodate this ever increasing data and analytical tools are continually being developed to analyze the same. Therefore, researchers are now equipped with numerous databases, analytical and prediction tools, in anticipation of better means of prevention of and therapeutic intervention in diseases of humans and other animals.
Epitope is a part of an antigen, recognized either by B- or T-cells and/or molecules of the host immune system. Since only a few amino acid residues that comprise an epitope (instead of the whole protein) are sufficient to elicit an immune response, attempts are being made to identify or predict this critical stretch or patch of amino acid residues, i.e., T-cell epitopes and B-cell epitopes to be included in multiple-subunit vaccines.
T-cell epitope prediction is a challenge owing to the high degree of MHC polymorphism and disparity in the volume of data on various steps encountered in the generation and presentation of T-cell epitopes in the living systems. Many algorithms/methods developed to predict T-cell epitopes and Web servers incorporating the same are available. These are based on approaches like considering amphipathicity profiles of proteins, sequence motifs, quantitative matrices (QM), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) and molecular docking simulations, etc. This chapter aims to introduce the reader to the principle(s) underlying some of these methods/algorithms as well as procedural and practical aspects of using the same.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Uebel S, Tampé R (1999) Specificity of the proteasome and the TAP transporter. Curr Opin Immunol 11:203–208
Niedermann G, King G, Butz S et al (1996) The proteolytic fragments generated by vertebrate proteasomes: structural relationships to major histocompatibility complex class I binding peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:8572–8577
Craiu A, Akopian T, Goldberg A et al (1997) Two distinct proteolytic processes in the generation of a major histocompatibility complex class I-presented peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:10850–10855
Koopmann JO, Post M, Neefjes JJ et al (1996) Translocation of long peptides by transporters associated with antigen processing (TAP). Eur J Immunol 26:1720–1728
Uebel S, Kraas W, Kienle S et al (1997) Recognition principle of the TAP transporter disclosed by combinatorial peptide libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:8976–8981
Gubler B, Daniel S, Armandola EA et al (1998) Substrate selection by transporters associated with antigen processing occurs during peptide binding to TAP. Mol Immunol 35:427–433
Kindt TJ, Osborne BA, Goldsby RA (2006) Kuby immunology. W. H. Freeman & Company, New York
Robinson J, Halliwell JA, McWilliam H et al (2013) The IMGT/HLA Database. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D1222–D1227
Lund O, Nielsen M, Kesmir C et al (2004) Definition of supertypes for HLA molecules using clustering of specificity matrices. Immunogenetics 55:797–810
Doytchinova IA, Flower DR (2005) In silico identification of supertypes for class II MHCs. J Immunol 174:7085–7095
Giudicelli V, Duroux P, Ginestoux C et al (2006) IMGT/LIGM-DB, the IMGT® comprehensive database of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D781–D784
Kaas Q, Ruiz M, Lefranc M-P (2004) IMGT/3Dstructure-DB and IMGT/Structural Query, a database and a tool for immunoglobulin, T cell receptor and MHC structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D208–D210
Ehrenmann F, Lefranc M-P (2011) IMGT/ 3Dstructure-DB: Querying the IMGT Database for 3D Structures in Immunology and Immunoinformatics (IG or Antibodies, TR, MH, RPI, and FPIA). Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011(6):750–761. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5637
Robinson J, Waller MJ, Parham P et al (2003) IMGT/HLA and IMGT/MHC sequence databases for the study of the major histocompatibility complex. Nucleic Acids Res 31:311–314
DeLisi C, Berzofski JA (1985) T-cell antigenic sites tend to be amphipathic structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:7048–7052
Margalit H, Spouge JL, Cornette JL et al (1987) Prediction of immunodominant helper T cell antigenic sites from the primary sequence. J Immunol 138:2213–2229
Geluk A, Van Meijgaarden KE, Janson AA et al (1992) Functional analysis of DR17(DR3)-restricted mycobacterial T cell epitopes reveals DR17-binding motif and enables the design of allele specific competitor peptides. J Immunol 149:2864–2871
Malcherek G, Falk K, Rötzschke O et al (1993) Natural peptide ligand motifs of two HLA molecules associated with myasthenia gravis. Int Immunol 5:1229–1237
Geluk A, van Meijgaarden KE, Southwood S et al (1994) HLADR3 molecules can bind peptides carrying two alternative specific submotifs. J Immunol 152:5742–5748
Seeger FH, Schirle M, Keilholz W et al (1999) Peptide motif of HLA-B*1510. Immunogenetics 49:996–999
Meister GE, Roberts CG, Berzofsky JA et al (1995) Two novel T cell epitope prediction algorithms based on MHC-binding motifs; comparison of predicted and published epitopes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV protein sequences. Vaccine 13:581–591
Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP et al (1999) SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 50:213–219
Bian H, Hammer J (2004) Discovery of promiscuous HLA-II-restricted T cell epitopes with TEPITOPE. Methods 34:468–475
Zhang L, Chen Y, Wong H-S et al (2012) TEPITOPEpan: Extending TEPITOPE for Peptide Binding Prediction Covering over 700 HLA-DR Molecules. PLoS One 7:e30483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030483
Parker KC, Bednarek MA, Coligan JE (1994) Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol 152: 163–175
Bhasin M, Raghava GPS (2004) Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. Vaccine 22:3195–3201
Bhasin M, Raghava GPS (2007) A hybrid approach for predicting promiscuous MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes. J Biosci 32: 31–42
Rojas R (1996) Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Springer, Berlin
Narayanan A, Keedwell EC, Olsson B (2002) Artificial intelligence techniques for bioinformatics. Appl Bioinformatics 1:191–222
Yang ZR (2010) Neural networks. Methods Mol Biol 609:197–222. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-241-4_12
Leman JK, Mueller R, Karakas M (2013) Simultaneous prediction of protein secondary structure and transmembrane spans. Proteins 81:1127–1140. doi:10.1002/prot.24258
Yang ZR (2004) Biological applications of support vector machines. Brief Bioinform 5: 328–338
Byvatov E, Schneider G (2003) Support vector machine applications in bioinformatics. Appl Bioinformatics 2:67–77
Kadam K, Sawant S, Kulkarni-Kale U et al. (2013) Prediction of protein function based on machine learning methods: an overview. In: Introduction to Sequence and Genome Analysis, iConcept Press Ltd., Hong Kong. (Accepted for publication)
Lata S, Bhasin M, Raghava GP (2009) MHCBN 4.0: A database of MHC/TAP binding peptides and T-cell epitopes. BMC Res Notes 2:61
Larsen MV, Lundegaard C, Lamberth K et al (2005) An integrative approach to CTL epitope prediction: A combined algorithm integrating MHC class I binding, TAP transport efficiency, and proteasomal cleavage predictions. Eur J Immunol 35:2295–2303
Kesmir C, Nussbaum AK, Schild H et al (2002) Prediction of proteasome cleavage motifs by neural networks. Protein Eng 15:287–296
Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Lund O et al (2005) The role of the proteasome in generating cytotoxic T-cell epitopes: insights obtained from improved predictions of proteasomal cleavage. Immunogenetics 57:33–41
Peters B, Bulik S, Tampe R et al (2003) Identifying MHC class I epitopes by predicting the TAP transport efficiency of epitope precursors. J Immunol 171:1741–1749
Sturniolo T, Bono E, Ding J et al (1999) Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices. Nat Biotechnol 17:555–561
Stranzl T, Larsen MV, Lundegaard C et al (2010) NetCTLpan: pan-specific MHC class I pathway epitope predictions. Immunogenetics 62:357–368
Dönnes P, Kohlbacher O (2005) Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway. Protein Sci 14:2132–2140
Daniel S, Brusic V, Caillat-Zucman S et al (1998) Relationship between peptide selectivities of human transporters associated with antigen processing and HLA class I molecules. J Immunol 161:617–624
Donnes P, Elofsson A (2002) Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC. BMC Bioinformatics 3:25
Brusic V, Rudy G, Harrsison LC (1998) MHCPEP, a database of MHC-binding peptides: Update. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 368–371
Doytchinova IA, Guan P, Flower DR (2006) EpiJen: a server for multistep T-cell epitope prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 7:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-131
Toseland CP, Taylor DJ, McSparron H et al (2005) Anti-Jen: a quantitative immunology database integrating functional, thermodynamic, kinetic, biophysical, and cellular data. Immunome Res 1:4. doi:10.1186/1745-7580-1-4
Dimitrov I, Garnev P, Flower DR et al (2010) EpiTOP—a proteochemometric tool for MHC class II binding prediction. Bioinformatics 26:2066–2068
Vita R, Zarebski L, Greenbaum JA et al (2010) The immune epitope database 2.0. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D854–D862
Hellberg S, Sjöström M, Skagerberg B et al (1987) Peptide quantitative structure-activity relationships, a multivariate approach. J Med Chem 30:1126–1135
Oyarzún P, Ellis PJ, Bodén M et al (2013) PREDIVAC: CD4+ T-cell epitope prediction for vaccine design that covers 95% of HLA class II DR protein diversity. BMC Bioinformatics 14:52. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-52
Reche PA, Zhang H, Glutting JP et al (2005) EPIMHC: a curated database of MHC-binding peptides for customized computational vaccinology. Bioinformatics 21:2140–2141
Singh H, Raghava GP (2003) ProPred1: prediction of promiscuous MHC Class-I binding sites. Bioinformatics 19:1009–1014
Singh H, Raghava GPS (2001) ProPred: Prediction of HLA-DR binding sites. Bioinformatics 17:1236–1237
Zhang GL, Deluca DS, Keskin DB et al (2011) MULTIPRED2: A computational system for large-scale identification of peptides predicted to bind to HLA supertypes and alleles. J Immunol Methods 374:53–61. doi:10.1016/j.jim. 2010.11.009
Acknowledgements
D.V.D. and U.K.K. gratefully acknowledge financial support under the aegis of Center of Excellence (CoE) grant from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Desai, D.V., Kulkarni-Kale, U. (2014). T-Cell Epitope Prediction Methods: An Overview. In: De, R., Tomar, N. (eds) Immunoinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1184. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1114-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1115-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols