Abstract
The diffusion model assumes that two-choice decisions are made by accumulating successive samples of noisy evidence to a response criterion. The model has a pair of criteria that represent the amounts of evidence needed to make each response. The time taken to reach criterion determines the decision time and the criterion that is reached first determines the response. The model predicts choice probabilities and the distributions of response times for correct responses and errors as a function of experimental conditions such as stimulus discriminability, speed-accuracy instructions, and manipulations of relative stimulus frequency, which affect response bias. This chapter describes the main features of the model, including mathematical methods for obtaining response time predictions, methods for fitting it to experimental data, including alternative fitting criteria, and ways to represent the fit to multiple experimental conditions graphically in a compact way. The chapter concludes with a discussion of recent work in psychology that links evidence accumulation to processes of perception, attention, and memory, and in neuroscience, to neural firing rates in the oculomotor control system in monkeys performing saccade-to-target decision tasks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Link, SW (1992) The wave theory of difference and similarity. Erlbaum, Englewood Cliffs
Luce RD (1986) Response times. Oxford University Press, New York
Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1983) Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vickers D (1979) Decision processes in visual perception. Academic, London
Ratcliff R (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev 85:59–108
Ratcliff R, Smith PL (2004) A comparison of sequential-sampling models for two choice reaction time. Psychol Rev 111:333–367
Cox DR, Miller HD (1965) The theory of stochastic processes. Chapman & Hall, London.
Wald A (1947) Sequential analysis. Wiley, New York
Laming DRJ (1968) Information theory of choice reaction time. Wiley, New York
Link SW, Heath RA (1975) A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 40:77–105
Gardiner CW (2004) Handbook of stochastic methods, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
Wiener N (1923) Differential space. J Math Phys 2:131–174
Feller W (1967) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Busemeyer J, Townsend JT (1992) Fundamental derivations from decision field theory. Math Soc Sci 23:255–282
Busemeyer J, Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol Rev 100:432–459
Smith PL (2000) Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: a foundational primer. J Math Psychol 44:408–463
Wagenmakers E-J, Brown S (2007) On the linear relationship between the mean and standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychol Rev 114:830–841
Ashby FG (1983) A biased random walk model for two choice reaction time. J Math Psychol 27:277–297
Ratcliff R, Van Zandt T, McKoon G (1999) Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychol Rev 106:261–300
Leite FP, Ratcliff R (2011) What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis. Judgm Decis Mak 6:651–687
Buonocore A, Giorno V, Nobile AG, Ricciardi L (1990) On the two-boundary first-crossing-time problem for diffusion processes. J Appl Probab 27:102–114
Tuerlinckx F, Maris E, Ratcliff R, De Boeck P (2001) A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 33:443–456
Diederich A, Busemeyer JR (2003) Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. J Math Psychol 47:304–322
Bhattacharya RB, Waymire EC (1990) Stochastic processes with applications. Wiley, New York
Vandekerckhove J, Tuerlinckx F (2008) Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: a DMAT primer. Behav Res Methods 40:61–72
Wiecki TV, Sofer I, Frank MJ (2013) HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Front Neuroinformatics 7:1–10
Voss A, Voss J (2008) A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters. J Math Psychol 52:1–9
Ratcliff R, Smith PL (2010) Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relationship between perceptual encoding and decision making. J Exp Psychol Gen 139:70–94
Ratcliff R (2002) A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychon Bull Rev 9:278–291
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313
Ratcliff R, Tuerlinckx F (2002) Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychon Bull Rev 9:438–481
Ratcliff R, Thapar A, McKoon G (2003) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Percept Psychophys 65:523–535
Ratcliff R, Thapar A, McKoon G (2004) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. J Mem Lang 50:408–424
Smith PL, Ratcliff R (2009) An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychol Rev 116:283–317
Ratcliff R, Rouder J (2000) A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:127–140
Smith PL, Ratcliff R, Wolfgang BJ (2004) Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Vis Res 44:1297–1320
Smith PL, Ratcliff R, Sewell DK (2014) Modeling perceptual discrimination in dynamic noise: time-changed diffusion and release from inhibition. J Math Psychol 59:95–113
Smith PL, Ratcliff R (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 27:161–168
Ratcliff R, Cherian A, Segraves M (2003) A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of simple two-choice decisions. J Neurophysiol 90:1392–1407
Ratcliff R, Hasegawa Y, Hasegawa R, Smith PL, Segraves M (2007) A dual diffusion model for single cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 97:1756–1797
Smith PL (2010) From Poisson shot noise to the integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: Neurally-principled models of diffusive evidence accumulation in decision-making and response time. J Math Psychol 54:266–283
Smith PL, McKenzie CRL (2011) Diffusive information accumulation by minimal recurrent neural models of decision-making. Neural Comput 23:2000–2031
Usher M, McClelland JL (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108:550–592
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, P., Ratcliff, R. (2015). An Introduction to the Diffusion Model of Decision Making. In: Forstmann, B., Wagenmakers, EJ. (eds) An Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2235-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2236-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)