Skip to main content

An Introduction to the Diffusion Model of Decision Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The diffusion model assumes that two-choice decisions are made by accumulating successive samples of noisy evidence to a response criterion. The model has a pair of criteria that represent the amounts of evidence needed to make each response. The time taken to reach criterion determines the decision time and the criterion that is reached first determines the response. The model predicts choice probabilities and the distributions of response times for correct responses and errors as a function of experimental conditions such as stimulus discriminability, speed-accuracy instructions, and manipulations of relative stimulus frequency, which affect response bias. This chapter describes the main features of the model, including mathematical methods for obtaining response time predictions, methods for fitting it to experimental data, including alternative fitting criteria, and ways to represent the fit to multiple experimental conditions graphically in a compact way. The chapter concludes with a discussion of recent work in psychology that links evidence accumulation to processes of perception, attention, and memory, and in neuroscience, to neural firing rates in the oculomotor control system in monkeys performing saccade-to-target decision tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Link, SW (1992) The wave theory of difference and similarity. Erlbaum, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  2. Luce RD (1986) Response times. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1983) Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vickers D (1979) Decision processes in visual perception. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ratcliff R (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev 85:59–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratcliff R, Smith PL (2004) A comparison of sequential-sampling models for two choice reaction time. Psychol Rev 111:333–367

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox DR, Miller HD (1965) The theory of stochastic processes. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wald A (1947) Sequential analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laming DRJ (1968) Information theory of choice reaction time. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Link SW, Heath RA (1975) A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 40:77–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gardiner CW (2004) Handbook of stochastic methods, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wiener N (1923) Differential space. J Math Phys 2:131–174

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feller W (1967) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Busemeyer J, Townsend JT (1992) Fundamental derivations from decision field theory. Math Soc Sci 23:255–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Busemeyer J, Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol Rev 100:432–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith PL (2000) Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: a foundational primer. J Math Psychol 44:408–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wagenmakers E-J, Brown S (2007) On the linear relationship between the mean and standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychol Rev 114:830–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashby FG (1983) A biased random walk model for two choice reaction time. J Math Psychol 27:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratcliff R, Van Zandt T, McKoon G (1999) Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychol Rev 106:261–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leite FP, Ratcliff R (2011) What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis. Judgm Decis Mak 6:651–687

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buonocore A, Giorno V, Nobile AG, Ricciardi L (1990) On the two-boundary first-crossing-time problem for diffusion processes. J Appl Probab 27:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuerlinckx F, Maris E, Ratcliff R, De Boeck P (2001) A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 33:443–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Diederich A, Busemeyer JR (2003) Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. J Math Psychol 47:304–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhattacharya RB, Waymire EC (1990) Stochastic processes with applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vandekerckhove J, Tuerlinckx F (2008) Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: a DMAT primer. Behav Res Methods 40:61–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiecki TV, Sofer I, Frank MJ (2013) HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Front Neuroinformatics 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Voss A, Voss J (2008) A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters. J Math Psychol 52:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratcliff R, Smith PL (2010) Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relationship between perceptual encoding and decision making. J Exp Psychol Gen 139:70–94

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ratcliff R (2002) A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychon Bull Rev 9:278–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ratcliff R, Tuerlinckx F (2002) Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychon Bull Rev 9:438–481

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ratcliff R, Thapar A, McKoon G (2003) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Percept Psychophys 65:523–535

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ratcliff R, Thapar A, McKoon G (2004) A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. J Mem Lang 50:408–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith PL, Ratcliff R (2009) An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychol Rev 116:283–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ratcliff R, Rouder J (2000) A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:127–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith PL, Ratcliff R, Wolfgang BJ (2004) Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Vis Res 44:1297–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith PL, Ratcliff R, Sewell DK (2014) Modeling perceptual discrimination in dynamic noise: time-changed diffusion and release from inhibition. J Math Psychol 59:95–113

    Google Scholar 

  38. Smith PL, Ratcliff R (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 27:161–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ratcliff R, Cherian A, Segraves M (2003) A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of simple two-choice decisions. J Neurophysiol 90:1392–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ratcliff R, Hasegawa Y, Hasegawa R, Smith PL, Segraves M (2007) A dual diffusion model for single cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 97:1756–1797

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith PL (2010) From Poisson shot noise to the integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process: Neurally-principled models of diffusive evidence accumulation in decision-making and response time. J Math Psychol 54:266–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith PL, McKenzie CRL (2011) Diffusive information accumulation by minimal recurrent neural models of decision-making. Neural Comput 23:2000–2031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Usher M, McClelland JL (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108:550–592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, P., Ratcliff, R. (2015). An Introduction to the Diffusion Model of Decision Making. In: Forstmann, B., Wagenmakers, EJ. (eds) An Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics