Skip to main content

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 637 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) is an elegant, minimally invasive reconstructive procedure to treat UPJ obstruction. The technique is discussed here in detail. Some selected patients can be discharged within 18 hours. Some series over five years report success rates of between 95 and 100%. The benefits over laparoscopic pyeloplasty are arguable and need to carefully be measured against the increased cost. Perhaps the main advantages are the ease of ureteric spatulation and suturing due to the EndoWrist instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM (2003) Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 17(3):155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Probst M, Beecken WD, Jonas D et al. (2003) Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up. World J Urol 21(3):133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chammas M, Jr., Feuillu B, Coissard A, Hubert J (2006) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 97(3):579–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2002a) Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 60(3):509–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G (2002b) A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42(5):453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (2005) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 95 Suppl 2: 102–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 167(3):1253–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR (2006) A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 243(4):486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorincz A, Knight CG, Kant AJ, Langenburg SE, Rabah R, Gidell K et al. (2005) Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study. J Pediatr Surg 40(2):418–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luke PP, Girvan AR, Al OM, Beasley KA, Carson M (2004) Laparoscopic robotic pyeloplasty using the Zeus Telesurgical System. Can J Urol 11(5):2396–2400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minervini A, Davenport K, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG (2006) Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. Eur Urol 49(3):536–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG (2006) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 67(5):932–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DG, Challacombe BJ, Olsburgh J et al. (2008) Ablative and reconstructive robotic-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Feb 9. [Epub ahead of Print]

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C et al. (2001) The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87(4):287–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patel V (2005) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 66(1):45–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Gettman MT (2004) Robotic pyeloplasty: technique and results. Urol Clin North Am 31(4):737–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio FJ (2000) Renal anatomy. Endourologic considerations. Urol Clin North Am 27(4):585–607, vii

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150(6):1795–1799

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH (1999) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology : 53(6):1099–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G et al. (2007) Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. BJU Int 100(4):880–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, D.G., Kearsley, J., Costello, A.J. (2008). Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. In: Dasgupta, P. (eds) Urologic Robotic Surgery in Clinical Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-243-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-243-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-242-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-243-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics