Skip to main content

Oncology from an HTA and Health Economic Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 213))

Abstract

In this chapter, we will present and discuss the challenges of assessing oncology products from a health economic perspective. We will provide a brief introduction on the need for economic evaluation in health care and focus on cost-effectiveness and comparative aspects of the evaluation of oncology products, which are of paramount interest to HTA decision-making bodies using economic evaluation in their decision-making framework. As the burden of oncology is well-documented, we do not discuss it in detail here. Before we address the specific issue of oncology, we will briefly define the critical aspects of HTA assessment and also define what a cost-effectiveness analysis is and why economic modelling is the most appropriate tool to assess the cost-effectiveness of oncology products. We will touch upon the prices of oncology drugs and the questions that high prices raise regarding funding and availability. We then present an overview of the general structure of an oncology cost-effectiveness model. Usually, this is quite simple, representing response, progression, advanced-stage disease and death. Despite the relative simplicity of these models, some issues may render the evaluation more complex; we will touch upon these in this chapter:

  • Issue with clinical inputs due to the design of randomised clinical trials (e.g. cross-over designs involving a treatment switch)

  • Need for survival extrapolation and limitations of current parametric models

  • Rare conditions with limited economic and comparative evidence available

  • High pace of clinical development

Finally, we will conclude with a discussion of the uncertainty around the evaluation of oncology products and the major evolution expected in health economics in oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annemans L (2018) Extrapolation in oncology modelling: novel methods for novel compounds. Available from: https://www.ispor.org/news/articles/Aug12/Extrapolation-in-Oncology-Modelling.asp. Accessed on 09 Feb 2018

  • Bai Y, Xu Y, Wu B (2017) Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of apatinib for advanced metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of health insurance system. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017:2816737

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Califf RM, Zarin DA, Kramer JM et al (2012) Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010. Jama 307:1838–1847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (2017) Most drugs paid for by £1.27bn cancer drugs fund had no “meaningful benefit”. BMJ 357:j2097. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2097

  • Collins M, Latimer N (2013) NICE’s end of life criteria: who gains, who loses? BMJ 346:f1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crabb N, Stevens A (2016) Exploring the assessment and appraisal of regenerative medicines and cell therapy products. NICE

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressman S, Browman GP, Hoch JS et al (2015) A time-trend economic analysis of cancer drug trials. Oncologist 20:729–736

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Hlubocky FJ et al (2014) The development of a financial toxicity patient-reported outcome in cancer: the COST measure. Cancer 120(20):3245–3253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dentaland Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV) (2012) Reimbursement decision for afinitor. TLV, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Experts in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (2013) The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs: from the perspective of a large group of CML experts. Blood 121(22):4439–4442

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fojo T, Grady C (2009) How much is life worth: cetuximab, non-small cell lung cancer, and the $440 billion question. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(15):1044–1048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson E, Koblbauer I, Begum N et al (2017) Modelling the survival outcomes of immuno-oncology drugs in economic evaluations: a systematic approach to data analysis and extrapolation. PharmacoEconomics 35:1257–1270

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbary G, Staab TR, Amelung VE, Dintsios C-M, Iking-Konert C, Mariotti Nesurini S, Walter M, Ruof J (2017) The effect of crossover in oncology clinical trials on evidence levels in early benefit assessment in Germany. Value Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson L, Sandin R, Ekman M, Ransberg J et al (2014) Analyzing overall survival in randomized controlled trials with crossover and implications for economic evaluation. Value Health 17:707–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (2013) Health economics and cost-effectiveness research with special reference to hemato-oncology. Med J Armed Forces India 69(3):273–277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Latimer N (2011) NICE DSU technical support document 14: undertaking survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials—extrapolation with patient-level data. Available from http://www.nicedsu.org.uk. Accessed on 09 Feb 2018

  • Latimer NR (2013) Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials—extrapolation with patient-level data: inconsistencies, limitations, and a practical guide. Med Decis Making 33:743–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latimer NR, Abrams KR (2014) NICE DSU technical support document 16: adjusting survival time estimates in the presence of treatment switching. Available from http://www.nicedsu.org.uk. Accessed on 09 Feb 2018

  • Marsh K, Xu P, Orfanos P, Gordon J, Griebsch I (2014) Model-based cost-effectiveness analyses for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a review of methods to model disease outcomes and estimate utility. Pharmacoeconomics 32(10):981–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Foley KA, Russell MW (2014) Current challenges in health economic modelling of cancer therapies: a research inquiry. Am Health Drug Benefits 7:153–162

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ, Evans DB, Acharya A, Baltussen RM (2000) Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ 9:235–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. NICE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (2011) Everolimus for the second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (NICE technology appraisal guidance 219). NICE, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann PJ, Bliss SK, Chambers JD (2012) Therapies for advanced cancers pose a special challenge for health technology assessment organizations in many countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 31:700–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Off-Label” indications for oncology drug use and drug compendia: history and current status. J Oncol Pract 1:102–105 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oncology Health Economic Modeling Post Progression Working Group of the ISPOR Oncology SIG. ISPOR, Boston (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad V, Mailankody S (2016) The UK cancer drugs fund experiment and the US cancer drug cost problem: bearing the cost of cancer drugs until it is unbearable. Mayo Clin Proc 91(6):707–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder HF, McDonough CF, Tosteson A, Lurie JD (2009) Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Semin Spine Surg 21(4):216–222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin R (2008) Criteria for deciding cost-effectiveness for expensive new anti-cancer agents. J Cancer Res Ther 4:1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13(4):322–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21736176-progress-developing-treatments-makes-oncology-research-favourite

  • Toumi M (2017) Introduction to market access for pharmaceuticals. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins C, Huang X, Latimer N, Tang Y, Wright EJ (2013) Adjusting overall survival for treatment switches: commonly used methods and practical application. Pharm Stat 12:348–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein MC, O’Brien B, Hornberger J, Jackson J, Johannesson M, McCabe C, Luce BR (2003) Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices—modeling studies. Value Health 6(1):9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D et al (2013) The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient’s experience. Oncologist 13(4):381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziomek J, El Mouaddin N, Ng T et al (2017) Analysis of recent approvals of immuno-oncology drugs across England, Scotland, Germany and France. Value Health A399–A811

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mondher Toumi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Francois, C., Zhou, J., Pochopien, M., Achour, L., Toumi, M. (2019). Oncology from an HTA and Health Economic Perspective. In: Walter, E. (eds) Regulatory and Economic Aspects in Oncology. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 213. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01207-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01207-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01206-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01207-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics