Abstract
This study discusses the role that States should play to limit dangerous effects of climate change which leads to human rights violations as it’s a problem that crosses the borders and it’s already a reality that many countries and islands are threatened to disappear. The State bears the responsibility to protect human rights, a responsibility that lies on international organizations as well. In part one, we discuss the insufficient measures taken by States at the international level, as many factors constitute obstacles: (1) The lack of internationally recognized human right to the environment linked to the absence of a legal status for climate refugees make the responsibility approach untenable. (2) The difficulty to establish legal responsibility based on a causal contribution to harm makes the responsibility approach insupportable. In fact, the 2001 International Law Commission draft articles on state responsibility for internationally wrongful acts are not binding. But the great difficulty concerns the distribution of the repair burden between States responsible for the emission of greenhouse gases. It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to measure the share of each State in climate change. (3) The limits of United Nations Frame Convention on Climate Change of which the great bargain is to avert catastrophic climate change consequences by reducing the average global temperature increase to about 2* above pre-industrial levels. Part two, suggests solutions through an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice, and analyzes the successful regulation of climate change effects by domestic courts, by focusing on the Urgenda case in Netherlands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abi Khalil, R.: In: Dar Saer Mashrek (ed.) Mondialisation: Droit international ou droit mondial (2014)
Climat en 2016.: une année noire pour la planète. La Marseillaise, www.lamarseillaise.fr. Last Accessed 14 Aug 2017
Mircea, D.: Climate change and human rights: emergence of a new fundamental right to proper climate. In: Editions Bruylant (ed.) Justice climatique/Climate justice: Enjeux et perspectives. Bruxelles (2016)
Belanger, M.: In: Gaulino (ed.) Droit international humanitaire. Paris (2002)
Mazega, P., Cournil, C.: Réflexions perspectives sur une protection juridique des refugies écologiques. Revue européenne des migrations internationales 23, 7–34 (2007)
Morel, M., Moore, N.: Migrations climatiques: quel rôle pour le droit international. Culture et Conflits (88), 61–84 (2012)
Lobry, D.: Une étude juridique des crises humanitaires résultant de catastrophes climatiques: l’exemple du continent africain. les cahiers d’Outre-mer, Revue de géographie de Bordeaux (260), 10–12 (2012)
Salomon, M.: Global responsibility for human rights. Oxford Scholarship Online. from http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284429.001.0001/acprof-9780199284429-chapter-1. Last Accessed 9 Nov 2007
Payne, P.: Climate change, basic rights, and international obligations. The Yale Review of International Studies, http://yris.yira.org/essays/681. Last Accessed 13 Aug 2012
Maljean-Dubois, S., Spencer, T., Wemaere, M.: La forme juridique du futur accord de Paris sur le climat; enjeux et principales options. Cahiers Droit, sciences & technologies– les frontières entre recherche et soin (5), 177–208 (2015)
Bodansky, D.: The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 25, 1–16 (2016)
Slaughter, A-M.: The Paris Approach to Global Governance, Project-Syndicate found at: http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/paris.agreement-model-for-global-governance-by-anne-marie-slaughter-2015. Last Accessed 28 Dec 2015
Pirlot, V.: Justice Climatique et Migrations Environnementales. Migrations: analyses & études (17), 3–16 (2015)
Sivaram, V. Norris, N.: The clean energy revolution. Fighting climate change with innovation. Foreign Aff. (5/6), 147–156 (2016)
Korman, A., Barcia, G.: Rethinking climate change: towards an International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion. Yale J. Int. Law 37, 35–42 (2013)
Grand, C. Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapon: a French perspective on the ICJ advisory opinion. Die Frieden warte (71), 273–280 (1996)
Mohr, M.: Advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the use of nuclear weapons under international law- a few thoughts on its strength and weakness. Int. Rev. Red Cross. 92–102 (1997)
Jennings, R.: The International Court of Justice after 50 Years. Am. J. Int. Law. (891/3), 493–505 (1995)
Namountougou, M.-A.: Sur la mission législative du juge international contemporain. Revue d’étude et de recherche sur le droit dans les pays d’Afrique Université Montesquieu Bordeaux, 1–31 (2015)
Boutonnet, M.: Responsabilité civile et changement climatique, Journées chiliennes du droit de l’environnement, Université du Chili, Santiago, 15/17 Oct. 2014, actes publiés (Legal Publishing ed.) Chile (2014)
Colombo, E.: Enforcing international climate change law in domestic courts: a new trend cases for boosting principle 10 of the Rio Declaration? J. Environ. Law. (35/1), 98–144 (2017)
Fernadez-Egea, R.: State responsibility for environmental harm, “Revisited” within the climate change regime, In: Maljean-Dubois S., Rajmani L. (eds.) Implementation of International Environmental Law XXX, pp. 389–390 (2011)
Versteeg, H., Venekamp, Y., Bakker, B.: Urgenda: International law, Dutch policies and the Separation of Powers, https://medium.com/@b.o.j.bakker/urgenda-international-law-dutch-policies-and-the-separation-of-powers-ee8277735d0a. Last Accessed 16 Dec 2016
Cox, R.: A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v the State of Netherlands. CIGI Papers (79), 8–24 (2015)
Bergamp, L.: The Urgenda judgment: a “victory” for the climate that likely to backfire. Retrieved from http://energypost.eu/urgenda-judgment-victory-climate-likely-backfire. Last Accessed 21 Sept 2015
Neyret, L.: Les sociétés à l’épreuve du changement climatique: éduquer-agir-gouverner-Risques et nouvelles responsabilités: l’émergence de la responsabilité climatique à l’échelle internationale. Esprit 1, 113–117 (2018)
Roy, S.: Distributive choices in Urgenda in EU climate law. Eur. Energy Law Rep. 9, 47–68 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Banna, M.A. (2019). State Responsibility in Combating Dangerous Climate Change: The Critical Role of Domestic and International Justice. In: Mateev, M., Poutziouris, P. (eds) Creative Business and Social Innovations for a Sustainable Future. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01662-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01662-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01661-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01662-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)