Skip to main content

Clinician Peer Exchange Groups (C-PEGs): Augmenting Medical Students’ Learning on Clinical Placement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Augmenting Health and Social Care Students’ Clinical Learning Experiences

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 25))

Abstract

This chapter describes our experience with a novel peer learning activity, Clinician Peer Exchange Groups (C-PEGs). C-PEGs were introduced as a forum for final year medical students on clinical placement to come together and share learning with their peers. C-PEGs took the form of multiple, peer-only, face-to-face groups of five students with relatively open-ended topics for discussion. These design elements helped to create a safe learning environment for students to share content that mattered to them. The scheduling of C-PEGs sessions throughout a clinical placement meant that students were able to discuss experiences while they were still fresh and this helped to engage the students with the process of reflection in an authentic and natural way. Both the design and evaluation of the C-PEGs activity will be presented in the body of this chapter. The evaluation results demonstrate that C-PEGs have value for learning, peer connection and peer support. The potential value of C-PEGs for final year medical students is heightened when considered as a scaffold for the lifelong learning skills of the reflective practitioner.

Learning through the experiences and challenges of day-to-day practice, as opposed to studying for an exam, is more characteristic of learning post-graduation. This peer-based discussion should be introduced prior to graduation so that students (and, in turn, graduates) are primed to optimize their learning from experience. C-PEGs provide a mechanism to achieve this reflection on action. Finally, implications for practice are discussed along with directions for further research to examine the development of health professional students’ reflective skills, and their capacity to openly consider and learn from mistakes and medical errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balint, E., Courtenay, M., Elder, A., Hull, S., & Paul, J. (1993). The doctor, the patient, and the group: Balint revisited. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, M., & Molloy, E. (2017). Intellectual streaking: The value of teachers exposing minds (and hearts). Medical Teacher, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (2015). On-the-job learning: The intern experience. (PhD), Monash University. Retrieved from http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/1134826 (148905).

  • Billett, S. (2016). Learning through health care work: Premises, contributions and practices. Medical Education, 50(1), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2001). In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, N., Corrigan, O., Allard, J., Archer, J., Barnes, R., Bleakley, A., et al. (2010). The transition from medical student to junior doctor: Today’s experiences of Tomorrow’s doctors. Medical Education, 44(5), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03604.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. L., Johnston, C. B., Singh, B., Garber, J. D., Kaplan, E., Lee, K., et al. (2011). A “safe space” for learning and reflection: One school’s design for continuity with a peer group across clinical clerkships. Academic Medicine, 86(12), 1560–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, C., & Molloy, E. (2009). Critical reflection in clinical education: Beyond the swampy lowlands. Clinical education in the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. S., Corrigan, J. M., & Kohn, L. T. (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2017). Mindset: Changing the way that you think to fulfill your potential. updated edition: Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, L. (2012). Learning together: A learning circle approach for population health status reporting: National Collaborating Centre for determinants of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. L. B. R. N. (1996). Learning circles: A strategy for clinical practicum. Nurse Educator May/June, 21(3), 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, E. A. (2007). Technical rationality in Schön’s reflective practice: Dichotomous or non-dualistic epistemological position. Nursing Philosophy, 8(2), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., Delany, C., Fischer, M. D., Smallwood, D., & Trumble, S. (2017). A growth mindset approach to preparing trainees for medical error. BMJ Quality & amp; Safety, 26(9), 771–774. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kori, K., Pedaste, M., Leijen, Ä., & Mäeots, M. (2014). Supporting reflection in technology-enhanced learning. Educational Research Review, 11, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, A. (1993). Transformation and tribal learning. British Columbia: Open Learning Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2007). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S., Harrison, J., & Flanagan, B. (2008). An innovative simulation-based program on Patient Safety for final year medical students. Paper presented at the 13th Ottawa International Conference on Clinical Competence, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., Borello, F., & Epstein, R. (2013). The impact of emotion in feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education. London: Routlage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., & Keating, J. (2011). Targeted preparation for clinical practice developing learning professionals (pp. 59–82): Dordrecht, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. (2011). Reflective learning groups for student nurses. In S. Billet & A. Henderson (Eds.), Developing learning professionals: Integrating experiences in university practice settings (pp. 119–130). Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlander, J. D., Barber, T. W., & Fincke, B. G. (2002). The morbidity and mortality conference: The delicate nature of learning from error. Academic Medicine, 77(10), 1001–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackin, P. (1994). Essential and ‘Desirable’ characteristics of a Balint group. Council of the British Balint Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinert, Y. (2004). Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Medical Education, 38(3), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01772.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, J., Haines, T., Canny, B., & Molloy, E. (2014). A study of medical students peer learning on clinical placements: What they have taught themselves to do. Journal of Peer Learning, 7(1), 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, J., Molloy, E., Haines, T., & Canny, B. (2016). Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: A narrative systematic review. Medical Education, 50(4), 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Introduction to peer-assisted learning. Peer-assisted Learning, 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torppa, M. A., Makkonen, E., Mårtenson, C., & Pitkälä, K. H. (2008). A qualitative analysis of student Balint groups in medical education: Contexts and triggers of case presentations and discussion themes. Patient Education and Counseling, 72(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, T. J., Wade, W. B., & Knock, L. D. (2009). A blueprint to assess professionalism: Results of a systematic review. Academic Medicine, 84(5), 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Harrison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harrison, J., Molloy, E., Bearman, M., Ting, C.Y., Leech, M. (2019). Clinician Peer Exchange Groups (C-PEGs): Augmenting Medical Students’ Learning on Clinical Placement. In: Billett, S., Newton, J., Rogers, G., Noble, C. (eds) Augmenting Health and Social Care Students’ Clinical Learning Experiences. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05560-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05560-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05559-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05560-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics