Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss the use of gravity models in the study of spatial structure. Using the recent discussion on functional polycentricity as a background, we argue that the gravity model approach has one obvious advantage when examining spatial structure: it can simultaneously assess functional polycentricity and spatial interdependencies within one modelling framework. The chapter concludes with a discussion of methods that can be applied to estimate the gravity model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, W. (1956), Location and land-use: towards a general theory of land-use. Harvard: University Press.
Baigent, E. (2004) Patrick Geddes, Lewis Mumford and Jean Gottmann: divisions over ‘megalopolis’. Progress in Human Geography, 28: 687–700.
Broekel, T., Balland, P. A., Burger, M., & van Oort, F. (2014). Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: a discussion of four methods. The Annals of Regional Science, 53(2), 423–452.
Burger, M. and Meijers, E. (2012) Form follows function? Linking functional and morphological polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49: 1127–1149.
Burger, M., Van Oort, F., & Linders, G. J. (2009). On the specification of the gravity model of trade: zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(2), 167–190.
Burger, M. J., de Goei, B., Van der Laan, L., & Huisman, F. J. (2011). Heterogeneous development of metropolitan spatial structure: Evidence from commuting patterns in English and Welsh city-regions, 1981–2001, Cities, 28(2), 160–170.
Burger, M. J., van der Knaap, B., & Wall, R. S. (2013). Revealed competition for greenfield investments between European regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 619–648.
Burger, M. J., Meijers, E. J., & Van Oort, F. G. (2014a). Multiple perspectives on functional coherence: Heterogeneity and multiplexity in the Randstad. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105: 444–464.
Burger, M. J., Van Der Knaap, B., & Wall, R. S. (2014b) Polycentricity and the multiplexity of urban networks. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 816–840.
Burger, M. J., Meijers, E. J., & Van Oort, F. G. (2014c). The Development and Functioning of Regional Urban Systems. Regional Studies, 48(12), 1921–1925.
Champion, T., & Coombes, M. (2016). Is Pennine England becoming More Polycentric or More Centripetal? An Analysis of Commuting Flows in a Transforming Industrial Region, 1981–2001. Urban Transformations: Centres, Peripheries and Systems, 73.
Florida, R., T. Gulden & C. Mellander (2008) The rise of the mega-region. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1: 459–476.
Flowerdew, R., & Aitkin, M. (1982). A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution. Journal of Regional Science, 22(2), 191–202.
De Goei, B., Burger, M.J., Van Oort, F.G. and Kitson, M. (2010) Functional polycentrism and urban network development in the Greater South East, United Kingdom: evidence from commuting patterns. Regional Studies, 44: 1149–1170.
Green, N. (2007) Functional polycentricity: a formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44: 2077–2103.
Gottmann, J. (1957) Megalopolis or the urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard. Economic Geography, 33: 189–200.
Gottmann, J. (1961) The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.
Hall, P. (1997). The future of the metropolis and its form. Regional Studies, 31(3), 211–220.
Hanssens, H., Derudder, B., Van Aelst, S., & Witlox, F. (2014). Assessing the functional polycentricity of the mega-city-region of Central Belgium based on advanced producer service transaction links. Regional Studies, 48(12), 1939–1953.
Harris, C. D., & Ullman, E. L. (1945). The nature of cities. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242(1), 7–17.
Howard, E. (1902) Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
Hoyler, M., Kloosterman, R. C., & Sokol, M. (2008). Polycentric puzzles–emerging mega-city regions seen through the lens of advanced producer services. Regional Studies, 42(8), 1055–1064.
Kloosterman, R.C. and Lambregts, B. (2001) Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: The case of the Randstad. Urban Studies, 38: 717–732.
Li, Y., and Phelps, N. (2018). Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the yangtze river delta region in china, 2014. Urban Studies, 55(2), 443–460.
Meijers, E.J. (2008) Measuring polycentricity and its promises. European Planning Studies, 16: 1313–1323.
Meijers, E. and Burger, M.J. (2010) Spatial structure and productivity in US metropolitan areas. Environment and Planning A, 42: 1383–1402.
Meijers, E., Hoogerbrugge, M., & Cardoso, R. (2018). Beyond polycentricity: Does stronger integration between cities in polycentric urban regions improve performance?. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 109: 1–21.
Parr, J. (2004). The polycentric urban region: a closer inspection. Regional Studies, 38(3), 231–240.
Short, J.R. (2007). Liquid City: Megalopolis and the Contemporary Northeast. Washington, D.C.: Resouces for the Future.
Stein, C. (1964) Regional City. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Van der Laan, L. (1998). Changing urban systems: an empirical analysis at two spatial levels. Regional Studies, 32(3), 235–247.
Van Oort, F., Burger, M., & Raspe, O. (2010). On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: Spatial integration, functional integration and economic complementarities within the Dutch Randstad. Urban Studies, 47(4), 725–748.
Vasanen, A. (2013). Spatial integration and functional balance in polycentric urban systems: A multi‐scalar approach. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 104(4), 410–425.
Veneri, P., & Burgalassi, D. (2012). Questioning polycentric development and its effects. Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS-2 regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 1017–1037.
Wright, F.L (1935) Broadacre city: a new community plan. Architectural Record, 77: 243–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burger, M., van Oort, F., Meijers, E. (2019). Examining Spatial Structure Using Gravity Models. In: D'Acci, L. (eds) The Mathematics of Urban Morphology. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12380-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12381-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)