Skip to main content

Hybrid Governance, Strategic Communication and the Quest for Institutional Legitimacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change

Abstract

This chapter seeks to understand how formal and informal leaders forge alliances in democratisation conflicts. It compares case studies from Serbia, Kenya and South Africa—three countries that have recently experienced democratic transitions. Drawing on the concepts of hybrid political arrangements and strategic communication, it unpacks the role of the media in crafting and conveying narratives that bestows legitimacy to some actors through the (re)framing of the past. In doing so, it argues that, far from being observers of the conflict, the media are active participants, shaping other actors’ strategies and contributing to advance some narratives. It also suggests that there is a lurking risk that the state could slide back into authoritarianism or be hollowed out and captured by undemocratic forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interviews quoted are coded as follows: Country code (EGY = Egypt, KEN = Kenya, SER = Serbia, RSA = South Africa), type of interviewee (Jour = journalist, Act = civil society activist, Pol = political actor), number of interview in sample.

References

  • Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1989). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagayoko, N., Hutchful, E., & Luckham, R. (2016). Hybrid Security Governance in Africa: Rethinking the Foundations of Security, Justice and Legitimate Public Authority. Conflict, Security & Development, 16(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, A. (2015). Power, Patronage, and Gatekeeper Politics in South Africa. African Affairs, 114(455), 226–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierschenk, T., & Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (1997). Local Powers and a Distant State in Rural Central African Republic. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 35(3), 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., & Motwani, N. (2014). The Limits of ‘Hybrid Governance’ in Afghanistan. Strategic Analysis, 38(4), 416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, A. (2015). The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (2002). Elections without Democracy: Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faris, D. M. (2013). Deep State, Deep Crisis: Egypt and American Policy. Middle East Policy, 20(4), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingeras, R. (2011). In the Hunt for the “Sultans of Smack:” Dope, Gangsters and the Construction of the Turkish Deep State. Middle East Journal, 65(3), 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann, T., & Péclard, D. (2010). Negotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa. Development and Change, 41(4), 539–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehne, M. V. (2013). Limits of Hybrid Political Orders: The Case of Somaliland. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 7(2), 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iazzolino, G., & Stremlau, N. (2017). New Media and Governance in Conflict. Third World Quarterly, 38(10), 2242–2257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, T. (2008). Going with the Grain in African Development? Development Policy Review, 26(6), 627–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, T. (2012). Neo-Patrimonialism, Rent-Seeking and Development: Going with the Grain? New Political Economy, 17(5), 677–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krstić, A., Parry, K., & Aiello, G. (2017). Visualising the Politics of Appearance in Times of Democratisation: An Analysis of the 2010 Belgrade Pride Parade Television Coverage. European Journal of Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417743042.

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Development. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckham, R., & Kirk, T. (2013). The Two Faces of Security in Hybrid Political Orders: A Framework for Analysis and Research. Stability, 2(2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (Eds.). (2014). Strategic Narratives in International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., & Stremlau, N. (2012). Media and Transitional Justice: Toward a Systematic Approach. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1077–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., & Stremlau, N. (2015). Strategic Communication and the Avoidance of Violent Conflict. In J. Hoffmann & V. Hawkins (Eds.), Communication and Peace: Mapping an Emerging Field. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. B. (2010). The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha Menocal, A., Fritz, V., & Rakner, L. (2008). Hybrid Regimes and the Challenges of Deepening and Sustaining Democracy in Developing Countries 1. South African Journal of International Affairs, 15(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, A. (1998). What is Democratic Consolidation? Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söyler, M. (2013). Informal Institutions, Forms of State and Democracy: The Turkish Deep State. Democratization, 20(2), 310–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stel, N., & van der Borgh, C. (2017). Political Parties and Minority Governance in Hybrid Political Orders: Reflections from Lebanon’s Palestinian Settlements and Kosovo’s Serbian Enclaves. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11(4), 490–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voltmer, K., & Kraetzschmar, H. (2015, June). Investigating the Media and Democratisation Conflicts. MeCoDem Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Soest, C., & Grauvogel, J. (2015). How Do Non-Democratic Regimes Claim Legitimacy? Comparative Insights from Post-Soviet Countries. GIGA Working Papers, 277. Retrieved from https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/system/files/publications/wp-277-online.pdf.

  • Wickham-Crowley, T. (1987). The Rise (and Sometimes Fall) of Guerrilla Governments in Latin America. Sociological Forum, 2(3), 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Iazzolino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iazzolino, G., Stremlau, N. (2019). Hybrid Governance, Strategic Communication and the Quest for Institutional Legitimacy. In: Voltmer, K., et al. Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics