Skip to main content

Metal Theft Solvability and Detection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crime Solvability Factors

Abstract

This chapter identifies the solvability factors for the seven types of metal theft offences committed on railway property in England and Wales and examines how they vary geographically in different British Transport Police (BTP) regions. The analysis of BTP data for 4001 metal theft offences committed between 2009 and 2010 enables nine significant solvability factors to be identified. The most important of these are checks with scrap metal dealers, covert police activities, witnessed offences, vehicle registration information and forensic evidence. Significant solvability factors explain 64% of the variation in detection outcomes. Detection odds depend on both the number of factors present in cases and their effect sizes. The number of solvability factors was a very good measure of incident solvability, with each extra factor improving detection odds fivefold. There were marked spatial variations in incident solvability and detection outcomes, some of which reflected metal offence type differences, solvability differences and apparent variations in investigative practice. The study indicates that statistical case-screening procedures would improve metal theft detection rates cost-effectively by informing police how to prioritise the allocation of resources to the most solvable cases and avoid applying investigative effort to cases that are unlikely to be solved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradford, B. (2012). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 24(1), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, J., Hopkins, M., Hubbard, R., Robinson, A., Speed, M., & Tilley, N. (2005). Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations (Home Office Research Study 295). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T., & Griffiths, M. (1996). Solving residential burglary (Police Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Services, Paper 77). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirikx, A., & van den Bulck, J. (2014). Media use and the process-based model for police cooperation. The British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 344–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E. (1979). Managing case assignments: The burglary investigation decision model replication. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, B., Elliot, C. V., Kraft, L. P., & Procter, S. H. (1977). Felony investigation decision model—An analysis of investigation elements of information. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, K. (2005). Volume crime investigations—A review of the research literature (Home Office Online Report OLR 44/05). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooi, B. R. (2010). Theft of scrap metal. Problem-Specific Guides Series, No. 58. US Department of Justice, Office of Community-Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, P., Coupe, T., & Ariel, B. (2015). ‘Solvability’and detection of metal theft on railway property. European journal on criminal policy and research, 21(4), 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidebottom, A., Jyoti, B., Bowers, K., Thompson, L., & Johnson, S. (2011). Theft in price-volatile markets: On the relationship between copper price and copper theft. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(3), 396–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with the police. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 16(2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N., Robinson, A., & Burrows, J. (2007). The investigation of high volume crime. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 226–254). London: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Timothy Coupe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robb, P., Coupe, R.T., Ariel, B. (2019). Metal Theft Solvability and Detection. In: Coupe, R., Ariel, B., Mueller-Johnson, K. (eds) Crime Solvability Factors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17160-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17159-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17160-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics